Researcher profile

Pierpaolo Brutti

Pierpaolo Brutti contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Reprogramming FairGANs with Variational Auto-Encoders: A New Transfer Learning Model

Fairness-aware GANs (FairGANs) exploit the mechanisms of Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) to impose fairness on the generated data, freeing them from both disparate impact and disparate treatment. Given the model's advantages and performance, we introduce a novel learning framework to transfer a pre-trained FairGAN to other tasks. This reprogramming process has the goal of maintaining the FairGAN's main targets of data utility, classification utility, and data fairness, while widening its applicability and ease of use. In this paper we present the technical extensions required to adapt the original architecture to this new framework (and in particular the use of Variational Auto-Encoders), and discuss the benefits, trade-offs, and limitations of the new model.

preprint2021arXiv

Towards global monitoring: equating the Food Insecurity Experience Scale (FIES) and food insecurity scales in Latin America

In order to face food insecurity as a global phenomenon, it is essential to rely on measurement tools that guarantee comparability across countries. Although the official indicators adopted by the United Nations in the context of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and based on the Food Insecurity Experience Scale (FIES) already embeds cross-country comparability, other experiential scales of food insecurity currently employ national thresholds and issues of comparability thus arise. In this work we address comparability of food insecurity experience-based scales by presenting two different studies. The first one involves the FIES and three national scales (ELCSA, EMSA and EBIA) currently included in national surveys in Guatemala, Ecuador, Mexico and Brazil. The second study concerns the adult and children versions of these national scales. Different methods from the equating practice of the educational testing field are explored: classical and based on the Item Response Theory (IRT).