BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Philipp Ernst

Philipp Ernst contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Computer Visioneess.IVMachine Learningphysics.med-ph

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Dual Branch Prior-SegNet: CNN for Interventional CBCT using Planning Scan and Auxiliary Segmentation Loss

This paper proposes an extension to the Dual Branch Prior-Net for sparse view interventional CBCT reconstruction incorporating a high quality planning scan. An additional head learns to segment interventional instruments and thus guides the reconstruction task. The prior scans are misaligned by up to +-5deg in-plane during training. Experiments show that the proposed model, Dual Branch Prior-SegNet, significantly outperforms any other evaluated model by >2.8dB PSNR. It also stays robust wrt. rotations of up to +-5.5deg.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Primal-Dual UNet for Sparse View Cone Beam Computed Tomography Volume Reconstruction

In this paper, the Primal-Dual UNet for sparse view CT reconstruction is modified to be applicable to cone beam projections and perform reconstructions of entire volumes instead of slices. Experiments show that the PSNR of the proposed method is increased by 10dB compared to the direct FDK reconstruction and almost 3dB compared to the modified original Primal-Dual Network when using only 23 projections. The presented network is not optimized wrt. memory consumption or hyperparameters but merely serves as a proof of concept and is limited to low resolution projections and volumes.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

CHAOS Challenge -- Combined (CT-MR) Healthy Abdominal Organ Segmentation

Segmentation of abdominal organs has been a comprehensive, yet unresolved, research field for many years. In the last decade, intensive developments in deep learning (DL) have introduced new state-of-the-art segmentation systems. In order to expand the knowledge on these topics, the CHAOS - Combined (CT-MR) Healthy Abdominal Organ Segmentation challenge has been organized in conjunction with IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI), 2019, in Venice, Italy. CHAOS provides both abdominal CT and MR data from healthy subjects for single and multiple abdominal organ segmentation. Five different but complementary tasks have been designed to analyze the capabilities of current approaches from multiple perspectives. The results are investigated thoroughly, compared with manual annotations and interactive methods. The analysis shows that the performance of DL models for single modality (CT / MR) can show reliable volumetric analysis performance (DICE: 0.98 $\pm$ 0.00 / 0.95 $\pm$ 0.01) but the best MSSD performance remain limited (21.89 $\pm$ 13.94 / 20.85 $\pm$ 10.63 mm). The performances of participating models decrease significantly for cross-modality tasks for the liver (DICE: 0.88 $\pm$ 0.15 MSSD: 36.33 $\pm$ 21.97 mm) and all organs (DICE: 0.85 $\pm$ 0.21 MSSD: 33.17 $\pm$ 38.93 mm). Despite contrary examples on different applications, multi-tasking DL models designed to segment all organs seem to perform worse compared to organ-specific ones (performance drop around 5\%). Besides, such directions of further research for cross-modality segmentation would significantly support real-world clinical applications. Moreover, having more than 1500 participants, another important contribution of the paper is the analysis on shortcomings of challenge organizations such as the effects of multiple submissions and peeking phenomena.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access