BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Philip White

Philip White contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
math.STMethodologyStatistics Theory

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
3topics
2close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Flexible Validity Conditions for the Multivariate Matérn Covariance in any Spatial Dimension and for any Number of Components

This paper addresses the problem of finding parametric constraints that ensure the validity of the multivariate Mat{é}rn covariance for modeling the spatial correlation structure of coregionalized variables defined in an Euclidean space. To date, much attention has been given to the bivariate setting, while the multivariate setting has been explored to a limited extent only. The existing conditions often imply severe restrictions on the upper bounds for the collocated correlation coefficients, which makes the multivariate Mat{é}rn model appealing for the case of weak spatial cross-dependence only. We provide a collection of sufficient validity conditions for the multivariate Mat{é}rn covariance that allows for more flexible parameterizations than those currently available, and prove that one can attain considerably higher upper bounds for the collocated correlation coefficients in comparison with our competitors. We conclude with an illustration on a trivariate geochemical data set and show that our enlarged parametric space yields better fitting performances.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2019arXiv

Towards a Complete Picture of Stationary Covariance Functions on Spheres Cross Time

With the advent of wide-spread global and continental-scale spatiotemporal datasets, increased attention has been given to covariance functions on spheres over time. This paper provides results for stationary covariance functions of random fields defined over $d$-dimensional spheres cross time. Specifically, we provide a bridge between the characterization in \cite{berg-porcu} for covariance functions on spheres cross time and Gneiting's lemma \citep{gneiting2002} that deals with planar surfaces. We then prove that there is a valid class of covariance functions similar in form to the Gneiting class of space-time covariance functions \citep{gneiting2002} that replaces the squared Euclidean distance with the great circle distance. Notably, the provided class is shown to be positive definite on every $d$-dimensional sphere cross time, while the Gneiting class is positive definite over $\R^d \times \R$ for fixed $d$ only. In this context, we illustrate the value of our adapted Gneiting class by comparing examples from this class to currently established nonseparable covariance classes using out-of-sample predictive criteria. These comparisons are carried out on two climate reanalysis datasets from the National Centers for Environmental Prediction and National Center for Atmospheric Research. For these datasets, we show that examples from our covariance class have better predictive performance than competing models.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access