BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Philip Healy

Philip Healy contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computingcs.CY

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - Baseline
4works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2015arXiv

Distributed Hierarchical Control versus an Economic Model for Cloud Resource Management

We investigate a hierarchically organized cloud infrastructure and compare distributed hierarchical control based on resource monitoring with market mechanisms for resource management. The latter do not require a model of the system, incur a low overhead, are robust, and satisfy several other desiderates of autonomic computing. We introduce several performance measures and report on simulation studies which show that a straightforward bidding scheme supports an effective admission control mechanism, while reducing the communication complexity by several orders of magnitude and also increasing the acceptance rate compared to hierarchical control and monitoring mechanisms. Resource management based on market-based mechanisms can be seen as an intermediate step towards cloud self-organization, an ideal alternative to current mechanisms for cloud resource management.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

The Case for Cloud Service Trustmarks and Assurance-as-a-Service

Cloud computing represents a significant economic opportunity for Europe. However, this growth is threatened by adoption barriers largely related to trust. This position paper examines trust and confidence issues in cloud computing and advances a case for addressing them through the implementation of a novel trustmark scheme for cloud service providers. The proposed trustmark would be both active and dynamic featuring multi-modal information about the performance of the underlying cloud service. The trustmarks would be informed by live performance data from the cloud service provider, or ideally an independent third-party accountability and assurance service that would communicate up-to-date information relating to service performance and dependability. By combining assurance measures with a remediation scheme, cloud service providers could both signal dependability to customers and the wider marketplace and provide customers, auditors and regulators with a mechanism for determining accountability in the event of failure or non-compliance. As a result, the trustmarks would convey to consumers of cloud services and other stakeholders that strong assurance and accountability measures are in place for the service in question and thereby address trust and confidence issues in cloud computing.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

An Auction-driven Self-organizing Cloud Delivery Model

The three traditional cloud delivery models -- IaaS, PaaS, and SaaS -- constrain access to cloud resources by hiding their raw functionality and forcing us to use them indirectly via a restricted set of actions. Can we introduce a new delivery model, and, at the same time, support improved security, a higher degree of assurance, find relatively simple solutions to the hard cloud resource management problems, eliminate some of the inefficiencies related to resource virtualization, allow the assembly of clouds of clouds, and, last but not least, minimize the number of interoperability standards? We sketch a self-organizing architecture for very large compute clouds composed of many-core processors and heterogeneous coprocessors. We discuss how self-organization will address each of the challenges described above. The approach is {\em bid-centric}. The system of heterogeneous cloud resources is dynamically, and autonomically, configured to bid to meet the needs identified in a high-level task or service specification. When the task is completed, or the service is retired, the resources are released for subsequent reuse. Our approach mimics the process followed by individual researchers who, in response to a call for proposals released by a funding agency, organize themselves in groups of various sizes and specialities. If the bid is successful, then the group carries out the proposed work and releases the results. After the work is completed, individual researchers in the group disperse, possibly joining other groups or submitting individual bids in response to other proposals. Similar protocols are common to other human activities such as procurement management.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Bid-Centric Cloud Service Provisioning

Bid-centric service descriptions have the potential to offer a new cloud service provisioning model that promotes portability, diversity of choice and differentiation between providers. A bid matching model based on requirements and capabilities is presented that provides the basis for such an approach. In order to facilitate the bidding process, tenders should be specified as abstractly as possible so that the solution space is not needlessly restricted. To this end, we describe how partial TOSCA service descriptions allow for a range of diverse solutions to be proposed by multiple providers in response to tenders. Rather than adopting a lowest common denominator approach, true portability should allow for the relative strengths and differentiating features of cloud service providers to be applied to bids. With this in mind, we describe how TOSCA service descriptions could be augmented with additional information in order to facilitate heterogeneity in proposed solutions, such as the use of coprocessors and provider-specific services.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access