Source author record

Philip Doyle

Philip Doyle appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

2works
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Embrace your incompetence! Designing appropriate CUI communication through an ecological approach

People form impressions of their dialogue partners, be they other people or machines, based on cues drawn from their communicative style. Recent work has suggested that the gulf between people's expectations and the reality of CUI interaction widens when these impressions are misaligned with the actual capabilities of conversational user interfaces (CUIs). This has led some to rally against a perceived overriding concern for naturalness, calling instead for more representative, or appropriate communicative cues. Indeed, some have argued for a move away from naturalness as a goal for CUI design and communication. We contend that naturalness need not be abandoned, if we instead aim for ecologically grounded design. We also suggest a way this might be achieved and call on CUI designers to embrace incompetence! By letting CUIs express uncertainty and embarrassment through ecologically valid and appropriate cues that are ubiquitous in human communication - CUI designers can achieve more appropriate communication without turning away from naturalness entirely.

preprint2022arXiv

Rules Of Engagement: Levelling Up To Combat Unethical CUI Design

While a central goal of HCI has always been to create and develop interfaces that are easy to use, a deeper focus has been set more recently on designing interfaces more ethically. However, the exact meaning and measurement of ethical design has yet to be established both within the CUI community and among HCI researchers more broadly. In this provocation paper we propose a simplified methodology to assess interfaces based on five dimensions taken from prior research on so-called dark patterns. As a result, our approach offers a numeric score to its users representing the manipulative nature of evaluated interfaces. It is hoped that the approach - which draws a distinction between persuasion and manipulative design, and focuses on how the latter functions rather than how it manifests - will provide a viable way for quantifying instances of unethical interface design that will prove useful to researchers, regulators and potentially even users.