BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Rainer Malaka

Rainer Malaka contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Human-Computer Interactioncs.CY

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Nutzungsverhalten und Funktionsanforderungen digitaler Trainingsanwendungen während der Pandemie

Due to contact restrictions, closure of fitness centers and quarantine measures, the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic led to a considerable decline of sporting activities. The first relaxation of these restrictions allowed German citizens to mostly return to their normal training and exercise behavior, yet the long-term impact of the recurring measures (i.e. the "Lockdown", "Lockdown light" as well as the "Corona Emergency Break" in the case of Germany) remain rather under-investigated. Using a survey of (n=108) German sportspersons, we measured a significant decline of sporting activities even within the intermediary phases without major pandemic constraints. To evaluate the capabilities of digital training applications in countering these effects, we additionally recorded the usage of, among others, apps, trackers, videos and conferencing systems and identified the most important as well as missing and/or essential features with regards to their capabilities of facilitating individual sport and training in times without access to facilities or social contacts. Effectively, the usage of smart watches, online videos and conferences increased significantly when compared to before the pandemic; and especially online videos and conferences contributed to higher training frequencies. Data-driven or individual feedback, motivation and collaboration revealed to be the most important or even necessary functions for users of digital training applications to counter the decline of social components of training.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Rules Of Engagement: Levelling Up To Combat Unethical CUI Design

While a central goal of HCI has always been to create and develop interfaces that are easy to use, a deeper focus has been set more recently on designing interfaces more ethically. However, the exact meaning and measurement of ethical design has yet to be established both within the CUI community and among HCI researchers more broadly. In this provocation paper we propose a simplified methodology to assess interfaces based on five dimensions taken from prior research on so-called dark patterns. As a result, our approach offers a numeric score to its users representing the manipulative nature of evaluated interfaces. It is hoped that the approach - which draws a distinction between persuasion and manipulative design, and focuses on how the latter functions rather than how it manifests - will provide a viable way for quantifying instances of unethical interface design that will prove useful to researchers, regulators and potentially even users.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Evaluating User Experiences in Mixed Reality

Measure user experience in MR (i.e., AR/VR) user studies is essential. Researchers apply a wide range of measuring methods using objective (e.g., biosignals, time logging), behavioral (e.g., gaze direction, movement amplitude), and subjective (e.g., standardized questionnaires) metrics. Many of these measurement instruments were adapted from use-cases outside of MR but have not been validated for usage in MR experiments. However, researchers are faced with various challenges and design alternatives when measuring immersive experiences. These challenges become even more diverse when running out-of-the lab studies. Measurement methods of VR experience recently received much attention. For example, research has started embedding questionnaires in the VE for various applications, allowing users to stay closer to the ongoing experience while filling out the survey. However, there is a diversity in the interaction methods and practices on how the assessment procedure is conducted. This diversity in methods underlines a missing shared agreement of standardized measurement tools for VR experiences. AR research strongly orients on the research methods from VR, e.g., using the same type of subjective questionnaires. However, some crucial technical differences require careful considerations during the evaluation. This workshop at CHI 2021 provides a foundation to exchange expertise and address challenges and opportunities of research methods in MR user studies. By this, our workshop launches a discussion of research methods that should lead to standardizing assessment methods in MR user studies. The outcomes of the workshop will be aggregated into a collective special issue journal article.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Towards Generating Virtual Movement from Textual Instructions A Case Study in Quality Assessment

Many application areas ranging from serious games for health to learning by demonstration in robotics, could benefit from large body movement datasets extracted from textual instructions accompanied by images. The interpretation of instructions for the automatic generation of the corresponding motions (e.g. exercises) and the validation of these movements are difficult tasks. In this article we describe a first step towards achieving automated extraction. We have recorded five different exercises in random order with the help of seven amateur performers using a Kinect. During the recording, we found that the same exercise was interpreted differently by each human performer even though they were given identical textual instructions. We performed a quality assessment study based on that data using a crowdsourcing approach and tested the inter-rater agreement for different types of visualizations, where the RGBbased visualization showed the best agreement among the annotators.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access