BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Ph. D.

Ph. D. contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
ApplicationsComputation and Languageecon.EMphysics.med-phRobotics

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 19 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
5works
0followers
5topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

5 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

A General Measure of Collision Hazard in Traffic

A collision hazard measure that has the essential characteristics to provide a measurement of safety that will be useful to AV developers, traffic infrastructure developers and managers, regulators and the public is introduced here. The Streetscope Collision Hazard Measure (SHM) overcomes the limitations of existing measures, and provides an independent leading indication of safety. * Trailing indicators, such as collision statistics, incur pain and loss on society, and are not an ethically acceptable approach. * Near-misses have been shown to be effective predictors of incidents. * Time-to-Collision (TTC) provides ambiguous indication of collision hazards, and requires assumptions about vehicle behavior. * Responsibility-Sensitive Safety (RSS), because of its reliance on rules for individual circumstances, will not scale up to handle the complexities of traffic. * Instantaneous Safety Metric (ISM) relies on probabilistic predictions of behaviors to categorize events (possible, imminent, critical), and does not provide a quantitative measure of the severity of the hazard. * Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) acceleration data is not correlated with hazard or risk. * A new measure, based on the concept of near-misses, that incorporates both proximity (separation distance) and motion (relative speed) is introduced. * Near-miss data has been shown to be predictive of the likelihood and severity of incidents. The new measure presented here gathers movement data about vehicles continuously and a quantitative score reflecting the hazard encountered or created (from which the riskiness or safeness of the behavior of vehicles can be estimated) is computed nearly continuously.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

A Robust Statistical method to Estimate the Intervention Effect with Longitudinal Data

Segmented regression is a standard statistical procedure used to estimate the effect of a policy intervention on time series outcomes. This statistical method assumes the normality of the outcome variable, a large sample size, no autocorrelation in the observations, and a linear trend over time. Also, segmented regression is very sensitive to outliers. In a small sample study, if the outcome variable does not follow a Gaussian distribution, then using segmented regression to estimate the intervention effect leads to incorrect inferences. To address the small sample problem and non-normality in the outcome variable, including outliers, we describe and develop a robust statistical method to estimate the policy intervention effect in a series of longitudinal data. A simulation study is conducted to demonstrate the effect of outliers and non-normality in the outcomes by calculating the power of the test statistics with the segmented regression and the proposed robust statistical methods. Moreover, since finding the sampling distribution of the proposed robust statistic is analytically difficult, we use a nonparametric bootstrap technique to study the properties of the sampling distribution and make statistical inferences. Simulation studies show that the proposed method has more power than the standard t-test used in segmented regression analysis under the non-normality error distribution. Finally, we use the developed technique to estimate the intervention effect of the Istanbul Declaration on illegal organ activities. The robust method detected more significant effects compared to the standard method and provided shorter confidence intervals.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Assessment of Amazon Comprehend Medical: Medication Information Extraction

In November 27, 2018, Amazon Web Services (AWS) released Amazon Comprehend Medical (ACM), a deep learning based system that automatically extracts clinical concepts (which include anatomy, medical conditions, protected health information (PH)I, test names, treatment names, and medical procedures, and medications) from clinical text notes. Uptake and trust in any new data product relies on independent validation across benchmark datasets and tools to establish and confirm expected quality of results. This work focuses on the medication extraction task, and particularly, ACM was evaluated using the official test sets from the 2009 i2b2 Medication Extraction Challenge and 2018 n2c2 Track 2: Adverse Drug Events and Medication Extraction in EHRs. Overall, ACM achieved F-scores of 0.768 and 0.828. These scores ranked the lowest when compared to the three best systems in the respective challenges. To further establish the generalizability of its medication extraction performance, a set of random internal clinical text notes from NYU Langone Medical Center were also included in this work. And in this corpus, ACM garnered an F-score of 0.753.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Boosting radiotherapy dose calculation accuracy with deep learning

In radiotherapy, a trade-off exists between computational workload/speed and dose calculation accuracy. Calculation methods like pencil-beam convolution can be much faster than Monte-Carlo methods, but less accurate. The dose difference, mostly caused by inhomogeneities and electronic disequilibrium, is highly correlated with the dose distribution and the underlying anatomical tissue density. We hypothesize that a conversion scheme can be established to boost low-accuracy doses to high-accuracy, using intensity information obtained from computed tomography (CT) images. A deep learning-driven framework was developed to test the hypothesis by converting between two commercially-available dose calculation methods: AAA (anisotropic-analytic-algorithm) and AXB (Acuros XB).A hierarchically-dense U-Net model was developed to boost the accuracy of AAA dose towards the AXB level. The network contained multiple layers of varying feature sizes to learn their dose differences, in relationship to CT, both locally and globally. AAA and AXB doses were calculated in pairs for 120 lung radiotherapy plans covering various treatment techniques, beam energies, tumor locations, and dose levels.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

On the Factors Influencing the Choices of Weekly Telecommuting Frequencies of Post-secondary Students in Toronto

The paper presents an empirical investigation of telecommuting frequency choices by post-secondary students in Toronto. It uses a dataset collected through a large-scale travel survey conducted on post-secondary students of four major universities in Toronto and it employs multiple alternative econometric modelling techniques for the empirical investigation. Results contribute on two fronts. Firstly, it presents empirical investigations of factors affecting telecommuting frequency choices of post-secondary students that are rare in literature. Secondly, it identifies better a performing econometric modelling technique for modelling telecommuting frequency choices. Empirical investigation clearly reveals that telecommuting for school related activities is prevalent among post-secondary students in Toronto. Around 80 percent of 0.18 million of the post-secondary students of the region, who make roughly 36,000 trips per day, also telecommute at least once a week. Considering that large numbers of students need to spend a long time travelling from home to campus with around 33 percent spending more than two hours a day on travelling, telecommuting has potential to enhance their quality of life. Empirical investigations reveal that car ownership and living farther from the campus have similar positive effects on the choice of higher frequency of telecommuting. Students who use a bicycle for regular travel are least likely to telecommute, compared to those using transit or a private car.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access