Researcher profile

Peyman Tavallali

Peyman Tavallali contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Machine Learning Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science Cryptography and Security Information Theory math.IT math.NA Methodology Numerical Analysis physics.data-an

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - Baseline

4works

0followers

9topics

4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

preprint2022arXiv

Uncertainty Quantification of the 4th kind; optimal posterior accuracy-uncertainty tradeoff with the minimum enclosing ball

There are essentially three kinds of approaches to Uncertainty Quantification (UQ): (A) robust optimization, (B) Bayesian, (C) decision theory. Although (A) is robust, it is unfavorable with respect to accuracy and data assimilation. (B) requires a prior, it is generally brittle and posterior estimations can be slow. Although (C) leads to the identification of an optimal prior, its approximation suffers from the curse of dimensionality and the notion of risk is one that is averaged with respect to the distribution of the data. We introduce a 4th kind which is a hybrid between (A), (B), (C), and hypothesis testing. It can be summarized as, after observing a sample $x$, (1) defining a likelihood region through the relative likelihood and (2) playing a minmax game in that region to define optimal estimators and their risk. The resulting method has several desirable properties (a) an optimal prior is identified after measuring the data, and the notion of risk is a posterior one, (b) the determination of the optimal estimate and its risk can be reduced to computing the minimum enclosing ball of the image of the likelihood region under the quantity of interest map (which is fast and not subject to the curse of dimensionality). The method is characterized by a parameter in $ [0,1]$ acting as an assumed lower bound on the rarity of the observed data (the relative likelihood). When that parameter is near $1$, the method produces a posterior distribution concentrated around a maximum likelihood estimate with tight but low confidence UQ estimates. When that parameter is near $0$, the method produces a maximal risk posterior distribution with high confidence UQ estimates. In addition to navigating the accuracy-uncertainty tradeoff, the proposed method addresses the brittleness of Bayesian inference by navigating the robustness-accuracy tradeoff associated with data assimilation.

preprint2021arXiv

Adversarial Poisoning Attacks and Defense for General Multi-Class Models Based On Synthetic Reduced Nearest Neighbors

State-of-the-art machine learning models are vulnerable to data poisoning attacks whose purpose is to undermine the integrity of the model. However, the current literature on data poisoning attacks is mainly focused on ad hoc techniques that are only applicable to specific machine learning models. Additionally, the existing data poisoning attacks in the literature are limited to either binary classifiers or to gradient-based algorithms. To address these limitations, this paper first proposes a novel model-free label-flipping attack based on the multi-modality of the data, in which the adversary targets the clusters of classes while constrained by a label-flipping budget. The complexity of our proposed attack algorithm is linear in time over the size of the dataset. Also, the proposed attack can increase the error up to two times for the same attack budget. Second, a novel defense technique based on the Synthetic Reduced Nearest Neighbor (SRNN) model is proposed. The defense technique can detect and exclude flipped samples on the fly during the training procedure. Through extensive experimental analysis, we demonstrate that (i) the proposed attack technique can deteriorate the accuracy of several models drastically, and (ii) under the proposed attack, the proposed defense technique significantly outperforms other conventional machine learning models in recovering the accuracy of the targeted model.

preprint2016arXiv

On the non-uniqueness of the instantaneous frequency

In this article, we investigate the debated Instantaneous Frequency (IF) topic. Here, we show that IF is non-unique inherently. We explain how this non-uniqueness can be quantified and explained from a mathematical perspective. The non-uniqueness of the IF can also be observed if different methods of adaptive signal processing are used. We will also show that even if we know the physical origin of an oscillatory signal, e.g. linear second order ordinary differential equation, the non-uniqueness is still present. All in all, we will end up with the conclusion that, without any a priori assumption about the relationship of the envelope and phase function of an oscillatory signal, there is not any preferred neither best representation of the IF of such oscillatory signal.

preprint2013arXiv

Convergence of a data-driven time-frequency analysis method

In a recent paper, Hou and Shi introduced a new adaptive data analysis method to analyze nonlinear and non-stationary data. The main idea is to look for the sparsest representation of multiscale data within the largest possible dictionary consisting of intrinsic mode functions of the form $\{a(t) \cos(θ(t))\}$, where $a \in V(θ)$, $V(θ)$ consists of the functions smoother than $\cos(θ(t))$ and $θ'\ge 0$. This problem was formulated as a nonlinear $L^0$ optimization problem and an iterative nonlinear matching pursuit method was proposed to solve this nonlinear optimization problem. In this paper, we prove the convergence of this nonlinear matching pursuit method under some sparsity assumption on the signal. We consider both well-resolved and sparse sampled signals. In the case without noise, we prove that our method gives exact recovery of the original signal.