Source author record

Peter Stumpf

Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Computational Geometry Discrete Mathematics math.CO Data Structures and Algorithms

Catalog footprint

Research overview

3works

4topics

4close collaborators

Actions

Is this your work?

Open graph Browse papers

preprint2020arXiv

Drawing Tree-Based Phylogenetic Networks with Minimum Number of Crossings

In phylogenetics, tree-based networks are used to model and visualize the evolutionary history of species where reticulate events such as horizontal gene transfer have occurred. Formally, a tree-based network $N$ consists of a phylogenetic tree $T$ (a rooted, binary, leaf-labeled tree) and so-called reticulation edges that span between edges of $T$ . The network $N$ is typically visualized by drawing $T$ downward and planar and reticulation edges with one of several different styles. One aesthetic criteria is to minimize the number of crossings between tree edges and reticulation edges. This optimization problem has not yet been researched. We show that, if reticulation edges are drawn x-monotone, the problem is NP-complete, but fixed-parameter tractable in the number of reticulation edges. If, on the other hand, reticulation edges are drawn like "ears", the crossing minimization problem can be solved in quadratic time.

preprint2020arXiv

Towards a characterization of stretchable aligned graphs

We consider the problem of stretching pseudolines in a planar straight-line drawing to straight lines while preserving the straightness and the combinatorial embedding of the drawing. We answer open questions by Mchedlidze et al. by showing that not all instances with two pseudolines are stretchable. On the positive side, for $k\geq 2$ pseudolines intersecting in a single point, we prove that in case that some edge-pseudoline intersection-patterns are forbidden, all instances are stretchable. For intersection-free pseudoline arrangements we show that every aligned graph has an aligned drawing. This considerably reduces the gap between stretchable and non-stretchable instances.

preprint2016arXiv

Local and Union Boxicity

The boxicity $\operatorname{box}(H)$ of a graph $H$ is the smallest integer $d$ such that $H$ is the intersection of $d$ interval graphs, or equivalently, that $H$ is the intersection graph of axis-aligned boxes in $\mathbb{R}^d$ . These intersection representations can be interpreted as covering representations of the complement $H^c$ of $H$ with co-interval graphs, that is, complements of interval graphs. We follow the recent framework of global, local and folded covering numbers (Knauer and Ueckerdt, Discrete Mathematics 339 (2016)) to define two new parameters: the local boxicity $\operatorname{box}_\ell(H)$ and the union boxicity $\overline{\operatorname{box}}(H)$ of $H$ . The union boxicity of $H$ is the smallest $d$ such that $H^c$ can be covered with $d$ vertex-disjoint unions of co-interval graphs, while the local boxicity of $H$ is the smallest $d$ such that $H^c$ can be covered with co-interval graphs, at most $d$ at every vertex. We show that for every graph $H$ we have $\operatorname{box}_\ell(H) \leq \overline{\operatorname{box}}(H) \leq \operatorname{box}(H)$ and that each of these inequalities can be arbitrarily far apart. Moreover, we show that local and union boxicity are also characterized by intersection representations of appropriate axis-aligned boxes in $\mathbb{R}^d$ . We demonstrate with a few striking examples, that in a sense, the local boxicity is a better indication for the complexity of a graph, than the classical boxicity.

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.