BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Jonathan Klawitter

Jonathan Klawitter contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Computational GeometryDiscrete Mathematicsmath.CO

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Morphing Rectangular Duals

A rectangular dual of a plane graph $G$ is a contact representations of $G$ by interior-disjoint axis-aligned rectangles such that (i) no four rectangles share a point and (ii) the union of all rectangles is a rectangle. A rectangular dual gives rise to a regular edge labeling (REL), which captures the orientations of the rectangle contacts. We study the problem of morphing between two rectangular duals of the same plane graph. If we require that, at any time throughout the morph, there is a rectangular dual, then a morph exists only if the two rectangular duals realize the same REL. Therefore, we allow intermediate contact representations of non-rectangular polygons of constant complexity. Given an $n$-vertex plane graph, we show how to compute in $O(n^3)$ time a piecewise linear morph that consists of $O(n^2)$ linear morphing steps.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

The Segment Number: Algorithms and Universal Lower Bounds for Some Classes of Planar Graphs

The segment number of a planar graph $G$ is the smallest number of line segments needed for a planar straight-line drawing of $G$. Dujmović, Eppstein, Suderman, and Wood [CGTA'07] introduced this measure for the visual complexity of graphs. There are optimal algorithms for trees and worst-case optimal algorithms for outerplanar graphs, 2-trees, and planar 3-trees. It is known that every cubic triconnected planar $n$-vertex graph (except $K_4$) has segment number $n/2+3$, which is the only known universal lower bound for a meaningful class of planar graphs. We show that every triconnected planar 4-regular graph can be drawn using at most $n+3$ segments. This bound is tight up to an additive constant, improves a previous upper bound of $7n/4+2$ implied by a more general result of Dujmović et al., and supplements the result for cubic graphs. We also give a simple optimal algorithm for cactus graphs, generalizing the above-mentioned result for trees. We prove the first linear universal lower bounds for outerpaths, maximal outerplanar graphs, 2-trees, and planar 3-trees. This shows that the existing algorithms for these graph classes are constant-factor approximations. For maximal outerpaths, our bound is best possible and can be generalized to circular arcs.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Upward planar drawings with two slopes

In an upward planar 2-slope drawing of a digraph, edges are drawn as straight-line segments in the upward direction without crossings using only two different slopes. We investigate whether a given upward planar digraph admits such a drawing and, if so, how to construct it. For the fixed embedding scenario, we give a simple characterisation and a linear-time construction by adopting algorithms from orthogonal drawings. For the variable embedding scenario, we describe a linear-time algorithm for single-source digraphs, a quartic-time algorithm for series-parallel digraphs, and a fixed-parameter tractable algorithm for general digraphs. For the latter two classes, we make use of SPQR-trees and the notion of upward spirality. As an application of this drawing style, we show how to draw an upward planar phylogenetic network with two slopes such that all leaves lie on a horizontal line.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Drawing Tree-Based Phylogenetic Networks with Minimum Number of Crossings

In phylogenetics, tree-based networks are used to model and visualize the evolutionary history of species where reticulate events such as horizontal gene transfer have occurred. Formally, a tree-based network $N$ consists of a phylogenetic tree $T$ (a rooted, binary, leaf-labeled tree) and so-called reticulation edges that span between edges of $T$. The network $N$ is typically visualized by drawing $T$ downward and planar and reticulation edges with one of several different styles. One aesthetic criteria is to minimize the number of crossings between tree edges and reticulation edges. This optimization problem has not yet been researched. We show that, if reticulation edges are drawn x-monotone, the problem is NP-complete, but fixed-parameter tractable in the number of reticulation edges. If, on the other hand, reticulation edges are drawn like "ears", the crossing minimization problem can be solved in quadratic time.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access