BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Peter Lohmann

Peter Lohmann appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
Logic in Computer ScienceComputational Complexitymath.LO

Catalog footprint

What is connected

5works
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

5 published item(s)

preprint2014arXiv

Boolean Dependence Logic and Partially-Ordered Connectives

We introduce a new variant of dependence logic called Boolean dependence logic. In Boolean dependence logic dependence atoms are of the type =(x_1,...,x_n,α), where αis a Boolean variable. Intuitively, with Boolean dependence atoms one can express quantification of relations, while standard dependence atoms express quantification over functions. We compare the expressive power of Boolean dependence logic to dependence logic and first-order logic enriched by partially-ordered connectives. We show that the expressive power of Boolean dependence logic and dependence logic coincide. We define natural syntactic fragments of Boolean dependence logic and show that they coincide with the corresponding fragments of first-order logic enriched by partially-ordered connectives with respect to expressive power. We then show that the fragments form a strict hierarchy.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Complexity of Model Checking for Modal Dependence Logic

Modal dependence logic (MDL) was introduced recently by Väänänen. It enhances the basic modal language by an operator =(). For propositional variables p_1,...,p_n the atomic formula =(p_1,...,p_(n-1),p_n) intuitively states that the value of p_n is determined solely by those of p_1,...,p_(n-1). We show that model checking for MDL formulae over Kripke structures is NP-complete and further consider fragments of MDL obtained by restricting the set of allowed propositional and modal connectives. It turns out that several fragments, e.g., the one without modalities or the one without propositional connectives, remain NP-complete. We also consider the restriction of MDL where the length of each single dependence atom is bounded by a number that is fixed for the whole logic. We show that the model checking problem for this bounded MDL is still NP-complete. We additionally extend MDL by allowing classical disjunction - introduced by Sevenster - besides dependence disjunction and show that classical disjunction is always at least as computationally bad as bounded arity dependence atoms and in some cases even worse, e.g., the fragment with nothing but the two disjunctions is NP-complete. Furthermore we almost completely classifiy the computational complexity of the model checking problem for all restrictions of propositional and modal operators for both unbounded as well as bounded MDL.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Computational Aspects of Dependence Logic

In this thesis (modal) dependence logic is investigated. It was introduced in 2007 by Jouko Vääanänen as an extension of first-order (resp. modal) logic by the dependence operator =(). For first-order (resp. propositional) variables x_1,...,x_n, =(x_1,...,x_n) intuitively states that the value of x_n is determined by those of x_1,...,x_n-1. We consider fragments of modal dependence logic obtained by restricting the set of allowed modal and propositional connectives. We classify these fragments with respect to the complexity of their satisfiability and model-checking problems. For satisfiability we obtain complexity degrees from P over NP, Sigma_P^2 and PSPACE up to NEXP, while for model-checking we only classify the fragments with respect to their tractability, i.e. we either show NP-completeness or containment in P. We then study the extension of modal dependence logic by intuitionistic implication. For this extension we again classify the complexity of the model-checking problem for its fragments. Here we obtain complexity degrees from P over NP and coNP up to PSPACE. Finally, we analyze first-order dependence logic, independence-friendly logic and their two-variable fragments. We prove that satisfiability for two-variable dependence logic is NEXP-complete, whereas for two-variable independence-friendly logic it is undecidable; and use this to prove that the latter is also more expressive than the former.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Complexity of two-variable Dependence Logic and IF-Logic

We study the two-variable fragments D^2 and IF^2 of dependence logic and independence-friendly logic. We consider the satisfiability and finite satisfiability problems of these logics and show that for D^2, both problems are NEXPTIME-complete, whereas for IF^2, the problems are undecidable. We also show that D^2 is strictly less expressive than IF^2 and that already in D^2, equicardinality of two unary predicates and infinity can be expressed (the latter in the presence of a constant symbol). This is an extended version of a publication in the proceedings of the 26th Annual IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science (LICS 2011).

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Complexity Results for Modal Dependence Logic

Modal dependence logic was introduced recently by Väänänen. It enhances the basic modal language by an operator =(). For propositional variables p_1,...,p_n, =(p_1,...,p_(n-1);p_n) intuitively states that the value of p_n is determined by those of p_1,...,p_(n-1). Sevenster (J. Logic and Computation, 2009) showed that satisfiability for modal dependence logic is complete for nondeterministic exponential time. In this paper we consider fragments of modal dependence logic obtained by restricting the set of allowed propositional connectives. We show that satisfibility for poor man's dependence logic, the language consisting of formulas built from literals and dependence atoms using conjunction, necessity and possibility (i.e., disallowing disjunction), remains NEXPTIME-complete. If we only allow monotone formulas (without negation, but with disjunction), the complexity drops to PSPACE-completeness. We also extend Väänänen's language by allowing classical disjunction besides dependence disjunction and show that the satisfiability problem remains NEXPTIME-complete. If we then disallow both negation and dependence disjunction, satistiability is complete for the second level of the polynomial hierarchy. In this way we completely classify the computational complexity of the satisfiability problem for all restrictions of propositional and dependence operators considered by Väänänen and Sevenster.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access