BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Peter Borg

Peter Borg contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Discrete Mathematicsmath.CO

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
2topics
2close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2025arXiv

Solution to a problem on isolation of cliques in uniform hypergraphs

A copy of a hypergraph $F$ is called an $F$-copy. Let $K_k^r$ denote the complete $r$-uniform hypergraph whose vertex set is $[k] = \{1, \dots, k\}$ (that is, the edges of $K_k^r$ are the $r$-element subsets of $[k]$). Given an $r$-uniform $n$-vertex hypergraph $H$, the $K_k^r$-isolation number of $H$, denoted by $ι(H, K_k^r)$, is the size of a smallest subset $D$ of the vertex set of $H$ such that the closed neighbourhood $N[D]$ of $D$ intersects the vertex sets of the $K_k^r$-copies contained by $H$ (equivalently, $H-N[D]$ contains no $K_k^r$-copy). In this note, we show that if $2 \leq r \leq k$ and $H$ is connected, then $ι(H, K_k^r) \leq \frac{n}{k+1}$ unless $H$ is a $K_k^r$-copy or $k = r = 2$ and $H$ is a $5$-cycle. This solves a recent problem of Li, Zhang and Ye. The result for $r = 2$ (that is, $H$ is a graph) was proved by Fenech, Kaemawichanurat and the author, and is used to prove the result for any $r$. The extremal structures for $r = 2$ were determined by various authors. We use this to determine the extremal structures for any $r$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2023arXiv

Solution to a problem of Katona on counting cliques of weighted graphs

A subset $I$ of the vertex set $V(G)$ of a graph $G$ is called a $k$-clique independent set of $G$ if no $k$ vertices in $I$ form a $k$-clique of $G$. An independent set is a $2$-clique independent set. Let $π_k(G)$ denote the number of $k$-cliques of $G$. For a function $w: V(G) \rightarrow \{0, 1, 2, \dots\}$, let $G(w)$ be the graph obtained from $G$ by replacing each vertex $v$ by a $w(v)$-clique $K^v$ and making each vertex of $K^u$ adjacent to each vertex of $K^v$ for each edge $\{u,v\}$ of $G$. For an integer $m \geq 1$, consider any $w$ with $\sum_{v \in V(G)} w(v) = m$. For $U \subseteq V(G)$, we say that $w$ is uniform on $U$ if $w(v) = 0$ for each $v \in V(G) \setminus U$ and, for each $u \in U$, $w(u) = \left\lfloor m/|U| \right\rfloor$ or $w(u) = \left\lceil m/|U| \right\rceil$. Katona asked if $π_k(G(w))$ is smallest when $w$ is uniform on a largest $k$-clique independent set of $G$. He placed particular emphasis on the Sperner graph $B_n$, given by $V(B_n) = \{X \colon X \subseteq \{1, \dots, n\}\}$ and $E(B_n) = \{\{X,Y\} \colon X \subsetneq Y \in V(B_n)\}$. He provided an affirmative answer for $k = 2$ (and any $G$). We determine graphs for which the answer is negative for every $k \geq 3$. These include $B_n$ for $n \geq 2$. Generalizing Sperner's Theorem and a recent result of Qian, Engel and Xu, we show that $π_k(B_n(w))$ is smallest when $w$ is uniform on a largest independent set of $B_n$. We also show that the same holds for complete multipartite graphs and chordal graphs. We show that this is not true of every graph, using a deep result of Bohman on triangle-free graphs.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

The maximum sum of sizes of cross-intersecting families of subsets of a set

A set of sets is called a family. Two families $\mathcal{A}$ and $\mathcal{B}$ of sets are said to be cross-intersecting if each member of $\mathcal{A}$ intersects each member of $\mathcal{B}$. For any two integers $n$ and $k$ with $1 \leq k \leq n$, let ${[n] \choose \leq k}$ denote the family of subsets of $[n] = \{1, \dots, n\}$ that have at most $k$ elements. We show that if $\mathcal{A}$ is a non-empty subfamily of ${[n] \choose \leq r}$, $\mathcal{B}$ is a non-empty subfamily of ${[n] \choose \leq s}$, $r \leq s$, and $\mathcal{A}$ and $\mathcal{B}$ are cross-intersecting, then \[|\mathcal{A}| + |\mathcal{B}| \leq 1 + \sum_{i=1}^s \left({n \choose i} - {n-r \choose i} \right),\] and equality holds if $\mathcal{A} = \{[r]\}$ and $\mathcal{B}$ is the family of sets in ${[n] \choose \leq s}$ that intersect $[r]$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Reducing the maximum degree of a graph: comparisons of bounds

Let $λ(G)$ be the smallest number of vertices that can be removed from a non-empty graph $G$ so that the resulting graph has a smaller maximum degree. Let $λ_{\rm e}(G)$ be the smallest number of edges that can be removed from $G$ for the same purpose. Let $k$ be the maximum degree of $G$, let $t$ be the number of vertices of degree $k$, let $M(G)$ be the set of vertices of degree $k$, let $n$ be the number of vertices in the closed neighbourhood of $M(G)$, and let $m$ be the number of edges incident to vertices in $M(G)$. Fenech and the author showed that $λ(G) \leq \frac{n+(k-1)t}{2k}$, and they essentially showed that $λ(G) \leq n \left ( 1- \frac{k}{k+1} { \Big( \frac{n}{(k+1)t} \Big) }^{1/k} \right )$. They also showed that $λ_{\rm e}(G) \leq \frac{m + (k-1)t}{2k-1}$ and $λ_{\rm e} (G) \leq m \left ( 1- \frac{k-1}{k} { \Big( \frac{m}{kt} \Big) }^{1/(k-1)} \right )$. These bounds are attained if $k \geq 2$ and $G$ is the union of $t$ pairwise vertex-disjoint $(k+1)$-vertex stars. For each of $λ(G)$ and $λ_{\rm e}(G)$, the two bounds on the parameter are compared for the purpose of determining, for each bound, the cases in which the bound is better than the other. This work is also motivated by the likelihood that similar pairs of bounds will be discovered for other graph parameters and the same analysis can be applied.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access