A new point of NP-hardness for 2-to-1 Label Cover
We show that given a satisfiable instance of the 2-to-1 Label Cover problem, it is NP-hard to find a $(23/24 + \eps)$-satisfying assignment.
Researcher profile
Per Austrin
Per Austrin contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.
ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Trust snapshot
Quick read
Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
7works
0followers
5topics
4close collaborators
Actions
Decide how to stay connected
Identity and collaboration
How to connect with this researcher
Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.
Log in to claimDirect collaboration
Open a focused conversation when the fit is right
Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.
Research graph
See the researcher in context
Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.
Building this graph slice
BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.
Published work
7 published item(s)
preprint2012arXiv
On the Usefulness of Predicates
Motivated by the pervasiveness of strong inapproximability results for Max-CSPs, we introduce a relaxed notion of an approximate solution of a Max-CSP. In this relaxed version, loosely speaking, the algorithm is allowed to replace the constraints of an instance by some other (possibly real-valued) constraints, and then only needs to satisfy as many of the new constraints as possible. To be more precise, we introduce the following notion of a predicate $P$ being \emph{useful} for a (real-valued) objective $Q$: given an almost satisfiable Max-$P$ instance, there is an algorithm that beats a random assignment on the corresponding Max-$Q$ instance applied to the same sets of literals. The standard notion of a nontrivial approximation algorithm for a Max-CSP with predicate $P$ is exactly the same as saying that $P$ is useful for $P$ itself. We say that $P$ is useless if it is not useful for any $Q$. This turns out to be equivalent to the following pseudo-randomness property: given an almost satisfiable instance of Max-$P$ it is hard to find an assignment such that the induced distribution on $k$-bit strings defined by the instance is not essentially uniform. Under the Unique Games Conjecture, we give a complete and simple characterization of useful Max-CSPs defined by a predicate: such a Max-CSP is useless if and only if there is a pairwise independent distribution supported on the satisfying assignments of the predicate. It is natural to also consider the case when no negations are allowed in the CSP instance, and we derive a similar complete characterization (under the UGC) there as well. Finally, we also include some results and examples shedding additional light on the approximability of certain Max-CSPs.
0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv
Inapproximability of NP-Complete Variants of Nash Equilibrium
In recent work of Hazan and Krauthgamer (SICOMP 2011), it was shown that finding an $\eps$-approximate Nash equilibrium with near-optimal value in a two-player game is as hard as finding a hidden clique of size $O(\log n)$ in the random graph $G(n,1/2)$. This raises the question of whether a similar intractability holds for approximate Nash equilibrium without such constraints. We give evidence that the constraint of near-optimal value makes the problem distinctly harder: a simple algorithm finds an optimal 1/2-approximate equilibrium, while finding strictly better than 1/2-approximate equilibria is as hard as the Hidden Clique problem. This is in contrast to the unconstrained problem where more sophisticated algorithms, achieving better approximations, are known. Unlike general Nash equilibrium, which is in PPAD, optimal (maximum value) Nash equilibrium is NP-hard. We proceed to show that optimal Nash equilibrium is just one of several known NP-hard problems related to Nash equilibrium, all of which have approximate variants which are as hard as finding a planted clique. In particular, we show this for approximate variants of the following problems: finding a Nash equilibrium with value greater than $η$ (for any $η>0$, even when the best Nash equilibrium has value $1-η$), finding a second Nash equilibrium, and finding a Nash equilibrium with small support. Finally, we consider the complexity of approximate pure Bayes Nash equilibria in two-player games. Here we show that for general Bayesian games the problem is NP-hard. For the special case where the distribution over types is uniform, we give a quasi-polynomial time algorithm matched by a hardness result based on the Hidden Clique problem.
0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv
Inapproximability of Treewidth, One-Shot Pebbling, and Related Layout Problems
We study the approximability of a number of graph problems: treewidth and pathwidth of graphs, one-shot black (and black-white) pebbling costs of directed acyclic graphs, and a variety of different graph layout problems such as minimum cut linear arrangement and interval graph completion. We show that, assuming the recently introduced Small Set Expansion Conjecture, all of these problems are hard to approximate within any constant factor.
0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv
A Simple Deterministic Reduction for the Gap Minimum Distance of Code Problem
We present a simple deterministic gap-preserving reduction from SAT to the Minimum Distance of Code Problem over $\F_2$. We also show how to extend the reduction to work over any finite field. Previously a randomized reduction was known due to Dumer, Micciancio, and Sudan, which was recently derandomized by Cheng and Wan. These reductions rely on highly non-trivial coding theoretic constructions whereas our reduction is elementary. As an additional feature, our reduction gives a constant factor hardness even for asymptotically good codes, i.e., having constant rate and relative distance. Previously it was not known how to achieve deterministic reductions for such codes.
0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv
Improved Inapproximability For Submodular Maximization
We show that it is Unique Games-hard to approximate the maximum of a submodular function to within a factor 0.695, and that it is Unique Games-hard to approximate the maximum of a symmetric submodular function to within a factor 0.739. These results slightly improve previous results by Feige, Mirrokni and Vondrák (FOCS 2007) who showed that these problems are NP-hard to approximate to within $3/4 + ε \approx 0.750$ and $5/6 + ε \approx 0.833$, respectively.
0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv
Noise Correlation Bounds for Uniform Low Degree Functions
We study correlation bounds under pairwise independent distributions for functions with no large Fourier coefficients. Functions in which all Fourier coefficients are bounded by $δ$ are called $δ$-{\em uniform}. The search for such bounds is motivated by their potential applicability to hardness of approximation, derandomization, and additive combinatorics. In our main result we show that $\E[f_1(X_1^1,...,X_1^n) ... f_k(X_k^1,...,X_k^n)]$ is close to 0 under the following assumptions: 1. The vectors $\{(X_1^j,...,X_k^j) : 1 \leq j \leq n\}$ are i.i.d, and for each $j$ the vector $(X_1^j,...,X_k^j)$ has a pairwise independent distribution. 2. The functions $f_i$ are uniform. 3. The functions $f_i$ are of low degree. We compare our result with recent results by the second author for low influence functions and to recent results in additive combinatorics using the Gowers norm. Our proofs extend some techniques from the theory of hypercontractivity to a multilinear setup.
0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access