BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Pedro L. Ramos

Pedro L. Ramos contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
math.STStatistics TheoryApplications

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Posterior properties of the Weibull distribution for censored data

The Weibull distribution is one of the most used tools in reliability analysis. In this paper, assuming a Bayesian approach, we propose necessary and sufficient conditions to verify when improper priors lead to proper posteriors for the parameters of the Weibull distribution in the presence of complete or right-censored data. Additionally, we proposed sufficient conditions to verify if the obtained posterior moments are finite. These results can be achieved by checking the behavior of the improper priors, which are applied in different objective priors to illustrate the usefulness of the new results. As an application of our theorem, we prove that if the improper prior leads to a proper posterior, the posterior mean, as well as other higher moments of the scale parameter, are not finite and, therefore, should not be used.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Power laws distributions in objective priors

The use of objective prior in Bayesian applications has become a common practice to analyze data without subjective information. Formal rules usually obtain these priors distributions, and the data provide the dominant information in the posterior distribution. However, these priors are typically improper and may lead to improper posterior. Here, we show, for a general family of distributions, that the obtained objective priors for the parameters either follow a power-law distribution or has an asymptotic power-law behavior. As a result, we observed that the exponents of the model are between 0.5 and 1. Understand these behaviors allow us to easily verify if such priors lead to proper or improper posteriors directly from the exponent of the power-law. The general family considered in our study includes essential models such as Exponential, Gamma, Weibull, Nakagami-m, Haf-Normal, Rayleigh, Erlang, and Maxwell Boltzmann distributions, to list a few. In summary, we show that comprehending the mechanisms describing the shapes of the priors provides essential information that can be used in situations where additional complexity is presented.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Power laws in the Roman Empire: a survival analysis

The Roman Empire shaped Western civilization, and many Roman principles are embodied in modern institutions. Although its political institutions proved both resilient and adaptable, allowing it to incorporate diverse populations, the Empire suffered from many internal conflicts. Indeed, most emperors died violently, from assassination, suicide, or in battle. These internal conflicts produced patterns in the length of time that can be identified by statistical analysis. In this paper, we study the underlying patterns associated with the reign of the Roman emperors by using statistical tools of survival data analysis. We consider all the 175 Roman emperors and propose a new power-law model with change points to predict the time-to-violent-death of the Roman emperors. This model encompasses data in the presence of censoring and long-term survivors, providing more accurate predictions than previous models. Our results show that power-law distributions can also occur in survival data, as verified in other data types from natural and artificial systems, reinforcing the ubiquity of power law distributions. The generality of our approach paves the way to further related investigations not only in other ancient civilizations but also in applications in engineering and medicine.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access