Source author record

Paul E. Schupp

Paul E. Schupp appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

8works
5topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

8 published item(s)

preprint2016arXiv

Computational complexity and the conjugacy problem

The conjugacy problem for a finitely generated group $G$ is the two-variable problem of deciding for an arbitrary pair $(u,v)$ of elements of $G$, whether or not $u$ is conjugate to $v$ in $G$. We construct examples of finitely generated, computably presented groups such that for every element $u_0$ of $G$, the problem of deciding if an arbitrary element is conjugate to $u_0$ is decidable in quadratic time but the worst-case complexity of the global conjugacy problem is arbitrary: it can be any c.e. Turing degree , can exactly mirror the Time Hierarchy Theorem, or can be $\mathcal{NP}$-complete. Our groups also have the property that the conjugacy problem is generically linear time: that is, there is a linear time partial algorithm for the conjugacy problem whose domain has density $1$, so hard instances are very rare. We also consider the complexity relationship of the "half-conjugacy" problem to the conjugacy problem. In the last section we discuss the extreme opposite situation: groups with algorithmically finite conjugation.

preprint2015arXiv

Asymptotic density and the coarse computability bound

For $r \in [0,1]$ we say that a set $A \subseteq ω$ is \emph{coarsely computable at density} $r$ if there is a computable set $C$ such that $\{n : C(n) = A(n)\}$ has lower density at least $r$. Let $γ(A) = \sup \{r : A \hbox{ is coarsely computable at density } r\}$. We study the interactions of these concepts with Turing reducibility. For example, we show that if $r \in (0,1]$ there are sets $A_0, A_1$ such that $γ(A_0) = γ(A_1) = r$ where $A_0$ is coarsely computable at density $r$ while $A_1$ is not coarsely computable at density $r$. We show that a real $r \in [0,1]$ is equal to $γ(A)$ for some c.e.\ set $A$ if and only if $r$ is left-$Σ^0_3$. A surprising result is that if $G$ is a $Δ^0_2$ $1$-generic set, and $A \leq\sub{T} G$ with $γ(A) = 1$, then $A$ is coarsely computable at density $1$.

preprint2015arXiv

Coarse Reducibility and Algorithmic Randomness

A coarse description of a subset A of omega is a subset D of omega such that the symmetric difference of A and D has asymptotic density 0. We study the extent to which noncomputable information can be effectively recovered from all coarse descriptions of a given set A, especially when A is effectively random in some sense. We show that if A is 1-random and B is computable from every coarse description D of A, then B is K-trivial, which implies that if A is in fact weakly 2-random then B is computable. Our main tool is a kind of compactness theorem for cone-avoiding descriptions, which also allows us to prove the same result for 1-genericity in place of weak 2-randomness. In the other direction, we show that if A is a 1-random set which Turing-reduces to 0', then there is a noncomputable c.e. set computable from every coarse description of A, but that not all K-trivial sets are computable from every coarse description of some 1-random set. We study both uniform and nonuniform notions of coarse reducibility. A set Y is uniformly coarsely reducible to X if there is a Turing functional Phi such that if D is a coarse description of X, then Phi^D is a coarse description of Y. A set B is nonuniformly coarsely reducible to A if every coarse description of A computes a coarse description of B. We show that a certain natural embedding of the Turing degrees into the coarse degrees (both uniform and nonuniform) is not surjective. We also show that if two sets are mutually weakly 3-random, then their coarse degrees form a minimal pair, in both the uniform and nonuniform cases, but that the same is not true of every pair of relatively 2-random sets, at least in the nonuniform coarse degrees.

preprint2013arXiv

Asymptotic Density and Computably Enumerable Sets

We study connections between classical asymptotic density and c.e. sets. We prove that a c.e. Turing degree d is not low if and only if d contains a c.e. set A of density 1 which has no computable subsets of density 1, giving a natural characterization of non-low c.e. degrees. In contrast, we prove that every nonzero c.e. degree contains a set which is generically computable but not coarsely computable. There is a very close connection between the computational complexity of a set and the computational complexity of its density as a real number where we measure complexity of real numbers as the position of their left Dedekind cuts in the Arithmetic Hierarchy. We characterize the lower densities, upper densities and densities of both computable and computably enumerable sets. We also study "computable at density r" where r is an arbitrary real number in the unit interval. Finally, we study connections between density and classical smallness notions such as immunity and cohesiveness.

preprint2010arXiv

-Generic Computability, Turing Reducibility and Asymptotic Density

Generic computability has been studied in group theory and we now study it in the context of classical computability theory. A set A of natural numbers is generically computable if there is a partial computable function f whose domain has density 1 and which agrees with the characteristic function of A on its domain. A set A is coarsely computable if there is a computable set C such that the symmetric difference of A and C has density 0. We prove that there is a c.e. set which is generically computable but not coarsely computable and vice versa. We show that every nonzero Turing degree contains a set which is not coarsely computable. We prove that there is a c.e. set of density 1 which has no computable subset of density 1. As a corollary, there is a generically computable set A such that no generic algorithm for A has computable domain. We define a general notion of generic reducibility in the spirt of Turing reducibility and show that there is a natural order-preserving embedding of the Turing degrees into the generic degrees which is not surjective.

preprint2002arXiv

Coxeter Groups, 2-Completion, Perimeter Reduction and Subgroup Separability

We show that all groups in a very large class of Coxeter groups are locally quasiconvex and have uniform membership problem solvable in quadratic time. If a group in the class satisfies a further hypothesis it is subgroup separable and relevant homomorphisms are also calculable in quadratic time. The algorithm also decides if a finitely generated subgroup has finite index.