BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Paul D. W. Kirk

Paul D. W. Kirk contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Machine LearningMethodologyApplications

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Bayesian nonparametric mixture inconsistency for the number of components: How worried should we be in practice?

We consider the Bayesian mixture of finite mixtures (MFMs) and Dirichlet process mixture (DPM) models for clustering. Recent asymptotic theory has established that DPMs overestimate the number of clusters for large samples and that estimators from both classes of models are inconsistent for the number of clusters under misspecification, but the implications for finite sample analyses are unclear. The final reported estimate after fitting these models is often a single representative clustering obtained using an MCMC summarisation technique, but it is unknown how well such a summary estimates the number of clusters. Here we investigate these practical considerations through simulations and an application to gene expression data, and find that (i) DPMs overestimate the number of clusters even in finite samples, but only to a limited degree that may be correctable using appropriate summaries, and (ii) misspecification can lead to considerable overestimation of the number of clusters in both DPMs and MFMs, but results are nevertheless often still interpretable. We provide recommendations on MCMC summarisation and suggest that although the more appealing asymptotic properties of MFMs provide strong motivation to prefer them, results obtained using MFMs and DPMs are often very similar in practice.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Multiple kernel learning for integrative consensus clustering of 'omic datasets

Diverse applications - particularly in tumour subtyping - have demonstrated the importance of integrative clustering techniques for combining information from multiple data sources. Cluster-Of-Clusters Analysis (COCA) is one such approach that has been widely applied in the context of tumour subtyping. However, the properties of COCA have never been systematically explored, and its robustness to the inclusion of noisy datasets, or datasets that define conflicting clustering structures, is unclear. We rigorously benchmark COCA, and present Kernel Learning Integrative Clustering (KLIC) as an alternative strategy. KLIC frames the challenge of combining clustering structures as a multiple kernel learning problem, in which different datasets each provide a weighted contribution to the final clustering. This allows the contribution of noisy datasets to be down-weighted relative to more informative datasets. We compare the performances of KLIC and COCA in a variety of situations through simulation studies. We also present the output of KLIC and COCA in real data applications to cancer subtyping and transcriptional module discovery. R packages "klic" and "coca" are available on the Comprehensive R Archive Network.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Two-step penalised logistic regression for multi-omic data with an application to cardiometabolic syndrome

Building classification models that predict a binary class label on the basis of high dimensional multi-omics datasets poses several challenges, due to the typically widely differing characteristics of the data layers in terms of number of predictors, type of data, and levels of noise. Previous research has shown that applying classical logistic regression with elastic-net penalty to these datasets can lead to poor results (Liu et al., 2018). We implement a two-step approach to multi-omic logistic regression in which variable selection is performed on each layer separately and a predictive model is then built using the variables selected in the first step. Here, our approach is compared to other methods that have been developed for the same purpose, and we adapt existing software for multi-omic linear regression (Zhao and Zucknick, 2020) to the logistic regression setting. Extensive simulation studies show that our approach should be preferred if the goal is to select as many relevant predictors as possible, as well as achieving prediction performances comparable to those of the best competitors. Our motivating example is a cardiometabolic syndrome dataset comprising eight 'omic data types for 2 extreme phenotype groups (10 obese and 10 lipodystrophy individuals) and 185 blood donors. Our proposed approach allows us to identify features that characterise cardiometabolic syndrome at the molecular level. R code is available at https://github.com/acabassi/logistic-regression-for-multi-omic-data.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access