BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Patrik Joslin Kenfack

Patrik Joslin Kenfack contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Artificial IntelligenceMachine LearningCryptography and Security

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

DP-SGD vs PATE: Which Has Less Disparate Impact on Model Accuracy?

Recent advances in differentially private deep learning have demonstrated that application of differential privacy, specifically the DP-SGD algorithm, has a disparate impact on different sub-groups in the population, which leads to a significantly high drop-in model utility for sub-populations that are under-represented (minorities), compared to well-represented ones. In this work, we aim to compare PATE, another mechanism for training deep learning models using differential privacy, with DP-SGD in terms of fairness. We show that PATE does have a disparate impact too, however, it is much less severe than DP-SGD. We draw insights from this observation on what might be promising directions in achieving better fairness-privacy trade-offs.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

RepFair-GAN: Mitigating Representation Bias in GANs Using Gradient Clipping

Fairness has become an essential problem in many domains of Machine Learning (ML), such as classification, natural language processing, and Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs). In this research effort, we study the unfairness of GANs. We formally define a new fairness notion for generative models in terms of the distribution of generated samples sharing the same protected attributes (gender, race, etc.). The defined fairness notion (representational fairness) requires the distribution of the sensitive attributes at the test time to be uniform, and, in particular for GAN model, we show that this fairness notion is violated even when the dataset contains equally represented groups, i.e., the generator favors generating one group of samples over the others at the test time. In this work, we shed light on the source of this representation bias in GANs along with a straightforward method to overcome this problem. We first show on two widely used datasets (MNIST, SVHN) that when the norm of the gradient of one group is more important than the other during the discriminator's training, the generator favours sampling data from one group more than the other at test time. We then show that controlling the groups' gradient norm by performing group-wise gradient norm clipping in the discriminator during the training leads to a more fair data generation in terms of representational fairness compared to existing models while preserving the quality of generated samples.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access