BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Patric Hagmann

Patric Hagmann contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
MethodologyNeurons and CognitionApplicationsComputer Visioneess.IVmath.STphysics.soc-phStatistics Theory

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
8topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Towards automated brain aneurysm detection in TOF-MRA: open data, weak labels, and anatomical knowledge

Brain aneurysm detection in Time-Of-Flight Magnetic Resonance Angiography (TOF-MRA) has undergone drastic improvements with the advent of Deep Learning (DL). However, performances of supervised DL models heavily rely on the quantity of labeled samples, which are extremely costly to obtain. Here, we present a DL model for aneurysm detection that overcomes the issue with ''weak'' labels: oversized annotations which are considerably faster to create. Our weak labels resulted to be four times faster to generate than their voxel-wise counterparts. In addition, our model leverages prior anatomical knowledge by focusing only on plausible locations for aneurysm occurrence. We frst train and evaluate our model through cross-validation on an in-house TOF-MRA dataset comprising 284 subjects (170 females / 127 healthy controls / 157 patients with 198 aneurysms). On this dataset, our best model achieved a sensitivity of 83%, with False Positive (FP) rate of 0.8 per patient. To assess model generalizability, we then participated in a challenge for aneurysm detection with TOF-MRA data (93 patients, 20 controls, 125 aneurysms). On the public challenge, sensitivity was 68% (FP rate=2.5), ranking 4th/18 on the open leaderboard. We found no signifcant diference in sensitivity between aneurysm risk-of-rupture groups (p=0.75), locations (p=0.72), or sizes (p=0.15). Data, code and model weights are released under permissive licenses. We demonstrate that weak labels and anatomical knowledge can alleviate the necessity for prohibitively expensive voxel-wise annotations.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Geometric renormalization unravels self-similarity of the multiscale human connectome

Structural connectivity in the brain is typically studied by reducing its observation to a single spatial resolution. However, the brain possesses a rich architecture organized over multiple scales linked to one another. We explored the multiscale organization of human connectomes using datasets of healthy subjects reconstructed at five different resolutions. We found that the structure of the human brain remains self-similar when the resolution of observation is progressively decreased by hierarchical coarse-graining of the anatomical regions. Strikingly, a geometric network model, where distances are not Euclidean, predicts the multiscale properties of connectomes, including self-similarity. The model relies on the application of a geometric renormalization protocol which decreases the resolution by coarse-graining and averaging over short similarity distances. Our results suggest that simple organizing principles underlie the multiscale architecture of human structural brain networks, where the same connectivity law dictates short- and long-range connections between different brain regions over many resolutions. The implications are varied and can be substantial for fundamental debates, such as whether the brain is working near a critical point, as well as for applications including advanced tools to simplify the digital reconstruction and simulation of the brain.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Two step multiple comparisons procedures for positively dependent data with application to detecting differences in human brain network topologies

We consider the problem of testing positively dependent multiple hypotheses assuming that a prior information about the dependence structure is available. We propose two-step multiple comparisons procedures that exploit the prior information of the dependence structure, without relying on strong assumptions. In the first step, we group the tests into subsets where tests are supposed to be positively dependent and in each of which we compute the standardized mean of the test scores. Given the subset mean scores or equivalently the subsets p-values, we apply a first screening at a predefined threshold, which results in two types of subsets. Based on this typing, the original single test p-values are modified such that they can be used in conjunction with any multiple comparison procedure. We show by means of different simulation that power is gained with the proposed two-step methods, and compare it with traditional multiple comparison procedures. As an illustration, our method is applied on real data comparing topological differences between two groups of human brain networks.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

Efficient statistical analysis of large correlated multivariate datasets: a case study on brain connectivity matrices

In neuroimaging, a large number of correlated tests are routinely performed to detect active voxels in single-subject experiments or to detect regions that differ between individuals belonging to different groups. In order to bound the probability of a false discovery of pair-wise differences, a Bonferroni or other correction for multiplicity is necessary. These corrections greatly reduce the power of the comparisons which means that small signals (differences) remain hidden and therefore have been more or less successful depending on the application. We introduce a method that improves the power of a family of correlated statistical tests by reducing their number in an orderly fashion using our a-priori understanding of the problem . The tests are grouped by blocks that respect the data structure and only one or a few tests per group are performed. For each block we construct an appropriate summary statistic that characterizes a meaningful feature of the block. The comparisons are based on these summary statistics by a block-wise approach. We contrast this method with the one based on the individual measures in terms of power. Finally, we apply the method to compare brain connectivity matrices. Although the method is used in this study on the particular case of imaging, the proposed strategy can be applied to a large variety of problems that involves multiple comparisons when the tests can be grouped according to attributes that depend on the specific problem. Keywords and phrases: Multiple comparisons ; Family-wise error rate; False discovery rate; Bonferroni procedure; Human brain connectivity; Brain connectivity matrices.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access