Source author record

Panos Rondogiannis

Panos Rondogiannis appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Logic in Computer Science Programming Languages Artificial Intelligence Computational Complexity Databases math.LO

Catalog footprint

What is connected

8works

6topics

4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Open graph Browse works

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

preprint2025arXiv

The Power of Negation in Higher-Order Datalog

We investigate the expressive power of Higher-Order Datalog$^\neg$ under both the well-founded and the stable model semantics, establishing tight connections with complexity classes. We prove that under the well-founded semantics, for all $k\geq 1$, $(k+1)$-Order Datalog$^\neg$ captures k-EXP, a result that holds without explicit ordering of the input database. The proof of this fact can be performed either by using the powerful existential predicate variables of the language or by using partially applied relations and relation enumeration. Furthermore, we demonstrate that this expressive power is retained within a stratified fragment of the language. Under the stable model semantics, we show that $(k+1)$-Order Datalog$^\neg$ captures co-(k-NEXP) using cautious reasoning and k-NEXP using brave reasoning, again with analogous results for the stratified fragment augmented with choice rules. Our results establish a hierarchy of expressive power, highlighting an interesting trade-off between order and non-determinism in the context of higher-order logic programming: increasing the order of programs under the well-founded semantics can surpass the expressive power of lower-order programs under the stable model semantics.

preprint2022arXiv

Strong Equivalence of Logic Programs with Ordered Disjunction: a Logical Perspective

Logic Programs with Ordered Disjunction (LPODs) extend classical logic programs with the capability of expressing preferential disjunctions in the heads of program rules. The initial semantics of LPODs, although simple and quite intuitive, is not purely model-theoretic. A consequence of this is that certain properties of programs appear non-trivial to formalize in purely logical terms. An example of this state of affairs is the characterization of the notion of strong equivalence for LPODs. Although the results of Faber et al. (2008) are accurately developed, they fall short of characterizing strong equivalence of LPODs as logical equivalence in some specific logic. This comes in sharp contrast with the well-known characterization of strong equivalence for classical logic programs, which, as proved by Lifschitz et al. (2001), coincides with logical equivalence in the logic of here-and-there. In this paper we obtain a purely logical characterization of strong equivalence of LPODs as logical equivalence in a four-valued logic. Moreover, we provide a new proof of the coNP-completeness of strong equivalence for LPODs, which has an interest in its own right since it relies on the special structure of such programs. Our results are based on the recent logical semantics of LPODs introduced by Charalambidis et al. (2021), a fact which we believe indicates that this new semantics may prove to be a useful tool in the further study of LPODs.

preprint2021arXiv

A Logical Characterization of the Preferred Models of Logic Programs with Ordered Disjunction

Logic Programs with Ordered Disjunction (LPODs) extend classical logic programs with the capability of expressing alternatives with decreasing degrees of preference in the heads of program rules. Despite the fact that the operational meaning of ordered disjunction is clear, there exists an important open issue regarding its semantics. In particular, there does not exist a purely model-theoretic approach for determining the most preferred models of an LPOD. At present, the selection of the most preferred models is performed using a technique that is not based exclusively on the models of the program and in certain cases produces counterintuitive results. We provide a novel, model-theoretic semantics for LPODs, which uses an additional truth value in order to identify the most preferred models of a program. We demonstrate that the proposed approach overcomes the shortcomings of the traditional semantics of LPODs. Moreover, the new approach can be used to define the semantics of a natural class of logic programs that can have both ordered and classical disjunctions in the heads of clauses. This allows programs that can express not only strict levels of preferences but also alternatives that are equally preferred. This work is under consideration for acceptance in TPLP.

preprint2019arXiv

The Expressive Power of Higher-Order Datalog

A classical result in descriptive complexity theory states that Datalog expresses exactly the class of polynomially computable queries on ordered databases. In this paper we extend this result to the case of higher-order Datalog. In particular, we demonstrate that on ordered databases, for all $k\geq2$, $k$-order Datalog captures $(k-1)$-EXPTIME. This result suggests that higher-order extensions of Datalog possess superior expressive power and they are worthwhile of further investigation both in theory and in practice. This paper is under consideration for acceptance in TPLP.

preprint2015arXiv

A Fixed Point Theorem for Non-Monotonic Functions

We present a fixed point theorem for a class of (potentially) non-monotonic functions over specially structured complete lattices. The theorem has as a special case the Knaster-Tarski fixed point theorem when restricted to the case of monotonic functions and Kleene's theorem when the functions are additionally continuous. From the practical side, the theorem has direct applications in the semantics of negation in logic programming. In particular, it leads to a more direct and elegant proof of the least fixed point result of [Rondogiannis and W.W.Wadge, ACM TOCL 6(2): 441-467 (2005)]. Moreover, the theorem appears to have potential for possible applications outside the logic programming domain.

preprint2015arXiv

Equivalence of two Fixed-Point Semantics for Definitional Higher-Order Logic Programs

Two distinct research approaches have been proposed for assigning a purely extensional semantics to higher-order logic programming. The former approach uses classical domain theoretic tools while the latter builds on a fixed-point construction defined on a syntactic instantiation of the source program. The relationships between these two approaches had not been investigated until now. In this paper we demonstrate that for a very broad class of programs, namely the class of definitional programs introduced by W. W. Wadge, the two approaches coincide (with respect to ground atoms that involve symbols of the program). On the other hand, we argue that if existential higher-order variables are allowed to appear in the bodies of program rules, the two approaches are in general different. The results of the paper contribute to a better understanding of the semantics of higher-order logic programming.

preprint2014arXiv

Minimum Model Semantics for Extensional Higher-order Logic Programming with Negation

Extensional higher-order logic programming has been introduced as a generalization of classical logic programming. An important characteristic of this paradigm is that it preserves all the well-known properties of traditional logic programming. In this paper we consider the semantics of negation in the context of the new paradigm. Using some recent results from non-monotonic fixed-point theory, we demonstrate that every higher-order logic program with negation has a unique minimum infinite-valued model. In this way we obtain the first purely model-theoretic semantics for negation in extensional higher-order logic programming. Using our approach, we resolve an old paradox that was introduced by W. W. Wadge in order to demonstrate the semantic difficulties of higher-order logic programming.

preprint2003arXiv

Minimum Model Semantics for Logic Programs with Negation-as-Failure

We give a purely model-theoretic characterization of the semantics of logic programs with negation-as-failure allowed in clause bodies. In our semantics the meaning of a program is, as in the classical case, the unique minimum model in a program-independent ordering. We use an expanded truth domain that has an uncountable linearly ordered set of truth values between False (the minimum element) and True (the maximum), with a Zero element in the middle. The truth values below Zero are ordered like the countable ordinals. The values above Zero have exactly the reverse order. Negation is interpreted as reflection about Zero followed by a step towards Zero; the only truth value that remains unaffected by negation is Zero. We show that every program has a unique minimum model M_P, and that this model can be constructed with a T_P iteration which proceeds through the countable ordinals. Furthermore, we demonstrate that M_P can also be obtained through a model intersection construction which generalizes the well-known model intersection theorem for classical logic programming. Finally, we show that by collapsing the true and false values of the infinite-valued model M_P to (the classical) True and False, we obtain a three-valued model identical to the well-founded one.