BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Angelos Charalambidis

Angelos Charalambidis contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Logic in Computer ScienceProgramming LanguagesArtificial IntelligenceComputational ComplexityDatabases

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 19 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
5works
0followers
5topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

5 published item(s)

preprint2025arXiv

The Power of Negation in Higher-Order Datalog

We investigate the expressive power of Higher-Order Datalog$^\neg$ under both the well-founded and the stable model semantics, establishing tight connections with complexity classes. We prove that under the well-founded semantics, for all $k\geq 1$, $(k+1)$-Order Datalog$^\neg$ captures k-EXP, a result that holds without explicit ordering of the input database. The proof of this fact can be performed either by using the powerful existential predicate variables of the language or by using partially applied relations and relation enumeration. Furthermore, we demonstrate that this expressive power is retained within a stratified fragment of the language. Under the stable model semantics, we show that $(k+1)$-Order Datalog$^\neg$ captures co-(k-NEXP) using cautious reasoning and k-NEXP using brave reasoning, again with analogous results for the stratified fragment augmented with choice rules. Our results establish a hierarchy of expressive power, highlighting an interesting trade-off between order and non-determinism in the context of higher-order logic programming: increasing the order of programs under the well-founded semantics can surpass the expressive power of lower-order programs under the stable model semantics.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Strong Equivalence of Logic Programs with Ordered Disjunction: a Logical Perspective

Logic Programs with Ordered Disjunction (LPODs) extend classical logic programs with the capability of expressing preferential disjunctions in the heads of program rules. The initial semantics of LPODs, although simple and quite intuitive, is not purely model-theoretic. A consequence of this is that certain properties of programs appear non-trivial to formalize in purely logical terms. An example of this state of affairs is the characterization of the notion of strong equivalence for LPODs. Although the results of Faber et al. (2008) are accurately developed, they fall short of characterizing strong equivalence of LPODs as logical equivalence in some specific logic. This comes in sharp contrast with the well-known characterization of strong equivalence for classical logic programs, which, as proved by Lifschitz et al. (2001), coincides with logical equivalence in the logic of here-and-there. In this paper we obtain a purely logical characterization of strong equivalence of LPODs as logical equivalence in a four-valued logic. Moreover, we provide a new proof of the coNP-completeness of strong equivalence for LPODs, which has an interest in its own right since it relies on the special structure of such programs. Our results are based on the recent logical semantics of LPODs introduced by Charalambidis et al. (2021), a fact which we believe indicates that this new semantics may prove to be a useful tool in the further study of LPODs.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

A Logical Characterization of the Preferred Models of Logic Programs with Ordered Disjunction

Logic Programs with Ordered Disjunction (LPODs) extend classical logic programs with the capability of expressing alternatives with decreasing degrees of preference in the heads of program rules. Despite the fact that the operational meaning of ordered disjunction is clear, there exists an important open issue regarding its semantics. In particular, there does not exist a purely model-theoretic approach for determining the most preferred models of an LPOD. At present, the selection of the most preferred models is performed using a technique that is not based exclusively on the models of the program and in certain cases produces counterintuitive results. We provide a novel, model-theoretic semantics for LPODs, which uses an additional truth value in order to identify the most preferred models of a program. We demonstrate that the proposed approach overcomes the shortcomings of the traditional semantics of LPODs. Moreover, the new approach can be used to define the semantics of a natural class of logic programs that can have both ordered and classical disjunctions in the heads of clauses. This allows programs that can express not only strict levels of preferences but also alternatives that are equally preferred. This work is under consideration for acceptance in TPLP.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2019arXiv

The Expressive Power of Higher-Order Datalog

A classical result in descriptive complexity theory states that Datalog expresses exactly the class of polynomially computable queries on ordered databases. In this paper we extend this result to the case of higher-order Datalog. In particular, we demonstrate that on ordered databases, for all $k\geq2$, $k$-order Datalog captures $(k-1)$-EXPTIME. This result suggests that higher-order extensions of Datalog possess superior expressive power and they are worthwhile of further investigation both in theory and in practice. This paper is under consideration for acceptance in TPLP.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Minimum Model Semantics for Extensional Higher-order Logic Programming with Negation

Extensional higher-order logic programming has been introduced as a generalization of classical logic programming. An important characteristic of this paradigm is that it preserves all the well-known properties of traditional logic programming. In this paper we consider the semantics of negation in the context of the new paradigm. Using some recent results from non-monotonic fixed-point theory, we demonstrate that every higher-order logic program with negation has a unique minimum infinite-valued model. In this way we obtain the first purely model-theoretic semantics for negation in extensional higher-order logic programming. Using our approach, we resolve an old paradox that was introduced by W. W. Wadge in order to demonstrate the semantic difficulties of higher-order logic programming.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access