Researcher profile

P. Tomczak

P. Tomczak contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - Baseline
2works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Quantum versus classical nature of a low-temperature magnetic phase transition in TbAl$_3$(BO$_3$)$_4$

Specific heat, $C_B$, of a TbAl$_3$(BO$_3$)$_4$ crystal was studied for 50 mK $<T<$ 300 K, with emphasis on $T<1$ K, where a phase transition was found at $T_c =0.68$ K. Nuclear, non-phonon ($C_m$), and lattice contributions to $C_B$ were separated. Lowering of $T_c$ with ncrease of magnetic field parallel to the easy magnetization axis, $B_{||}$, was found. It was established that $C_m$ and a Grüneisen ratio depend on $B_{||}$ and $T$ in a way characteristic of systems, in which a classical transition is driven by quantum fluctuations, QF, to a quantum critical point at $T=0$, by tuning a control parameter ($B_{||}$). The $B_{||} - T$ phase diagram was constructed and the dynamical critical exponent $0.82 \le z \le 0.96$ was assessed. Nature of the transition was not established explicitly. Magnetization studies point at the ferromagnetic ordering of Tb$^{3+}$ magnetic moments, however, lowering of $T_c$ with increase in $B_{||}$ is opposite to the classical behavior. Hence, a dominant role of QF was supposed.

preprint2014arXiv

Spin-Wave Resonance Model of Surface Pinning in Ferromagnetic Semiconductor (Ga,Mn)As Thin Films

The source of spin-wave resonance (SWR) in thin films of the ferromagnetic semiconductor (Ga,Mn)As is still under debate: does SWR stem from the \emph{surface} anisotropy (in which case the surface inhomogeneity (SI) model would apply), or does it originate in the \emph{bulk} inhomogeneity of the magnetic structure of the sample (and thus requires the use of the volume inhomogeneity (VI) model)? This paper outlines the ground on which the controversy arose and shows why in different conditions a resonance sample may meet the assumptions of either the SI or the VI model. In our considerations we refer to the SWR spectra measured by Furdyna's team [X. Liu \textit{et al.}, Physical Review B \textbf{75}, 195220 (2007)] in (Ga,Mn)As thin films in different configurations of the static magnetic field $\vec{H}$ with respect to the surface. We demonstrate that the observed configuration dependence of the SWR spectrum of the studied material can be described with the use of the surface pinning parameter.