BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Oumarou Oumarou

Oumarou Oumarou contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
quant-phEmerging Technologies

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
2topics
2close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2021arXiv

Halving the width of Toffoli based constant modular addition to n+3 qubits

We present an arithmetic circuit performing constant modular addition having $\mathcal{O}(n)$ depth of Toffoli gates and using a total of $n+3$ qubits. This is an improvement by a factor of two compared to the width of the state-of-the-art Toffoli-based constant modular adder. The advantage of our adder, compared to the ones operating in the Fourier-basis, is that it does not require small angle rotations and their Clifford+T decomposition. Our circuit uses a recursive adder combined with the modular addition scheme proposed by Vedral et. al. The circuit is implemented and verified exhaustively with QUANTIFY, an open-sourced framework. We also report on the Clifford+T cost of the circuit.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

On the realistic worst case analysis of quantum arithmetic circuits

We provide evidence that commonly held intuitions when designing quantum circuits can be misleading. In particular we show that: a) reducing the T-count can increase the total depth; b) it may be beneficial to trade CNOTs for measurements in NISQ circuits; c) measurement-based uncomputation of relative phase Toffoli ancillae can make up to 30\% of a circuit's depth; d) area and volume cost metrics can misreport the resource analysis. Our findings assume that qubits are and will remain a very scarce resource. The results are applicable for both NISQ and QECC protected circuits. Our method uses multiple ways of decomposing Toffoli gates into Clifford+T gates. We illustrate our method on addition and multiplication circuits using ripple-carry. As a byproduct result we show systematically that for a practically significant range of circuit widths, ripple-carry addition circuits are more resource efficient than the carry-lookahead addition ones. The methods and circuits were implemented in the open-source QUANTIFY software.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Parallelising the Queries in Bucket Brigade Quantum RAM

Quantum algorithms often use quantum RAMs (QRAM) for accessing information stored in a database-like manner. QRAMs have to be fast, resource efficient and fault-tolerant. The latter is often influenced by access speeds, because shorter times introduce less exposure of the stored information to noise. The total execution time of an algorithm depends on the QRAM access time which includes: 1) address translation time, and 2) effective query time. The bucket brigade QRAMs were proposed to achieve faster addressing at the cost of exponentially many ancillae. We illustrate a systematic method to significantly reduce the effective query time by using Clifford+T gate parallelism. The method does not introduce any ancillae qubits. Our parallelisation method is compatible with the surface code quantum error correction. We show that parallelisation is a result of advantageous Toffoli gate decomposition in terms of Clifford+T gates, and after addresses have been translated, we achieve theoretical $\mathcal{O}(1)$ parallelism for the effective queries. We conclude that, in theory: 1) fault-tolerant bucket brigade quantum RAM queries can be performed approximately with the speed of classical RAM; 2) the exponentially many ancillae from the bucket brigade addressing scheme are a trade-off cost for achieving exponential query speedup compared to quantum read-only memories whose queries are sequential by design. The methods to compile, parallelise and analyse the presented QRAM circuits were implemented in software which is available online.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

QUANTIFY: A framework for resource analysis and design verification of quantum circuits

Quantum resource analysis is crucial for designing quantum circuits as well as assessing the viability of arbitrary (error-corrected) quantum computations. To this end, we introduce QUANTIFY, which is an open-source framework for the quantitative analysis of quantum circuits. It is based on Google Cirq and is developed with Clifford+T circuits in mind, and it includes the necessary methods to handle Toffoli+H and more generalised controlled quantum gates, too. Key features of QUANTIFY include: (1) analysis and optimisation methods which are compatible with the surface code, (2) choice between different automated (mixed polarity) Toffoli gate decompositions, (3) semi-automatic quantum circuit rewriting and quantum gate insertion methods that take into account known gate commutation rules, and (4) novel optimiser types that can be combined with different verification methods (e.g. truth table or circuit invariants like number of wires). For benchmarking purposes QUANTIFY includes quantum memory and quantum arithmetic circuits. Experimental results show that the framework's performance scales to circuits with thousands of qubits.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access