BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Oliver Kullmann

Oliver Kullmann contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Discrete MathematicsLogic in Computer Sciencemath.COComputational ComplexityArtificial IntelligenceData Structures and Algorithms

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - Emerging
16works
0followers
6topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

16 published item(s)

preprint2016arXiv

Minimal unsatisfiability and deficiency: recent developments

Starting with Aharoni and Linial in 1986, the deficiency delta(F) = c(F) - n(F) >= 1 for minimally unsatisfiable clause-sets F, the difference of the number of clauses and the number of variables, is playing an important role in investigations into the structure of minimal unsatisfiability. The talk belonging to this extended abstract, available at http://cs.swan.ac.uk/~csoliver/papers.html#BORDEAUX2016 , gives a high-level overview on recent developments.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Solving and Verifying the boolean Pythagorean Triples problem via Cube-and-Conquer

The boolean Pythagorean Triples problem has been a longstanding open problem in Ramsey Theory: Can the set N = $\{1, 2, ...\}$ of natural numbers be divided into two parts, such that no part contains a triple $(a,b,c)$ with $a^2 + b^2 = c^2$ ? A prize for the solution was offered by Ronald Graham over two decades ago. We solve this problem, proving in fact the impossibility, by using the Cube-and-Conquer paradigm, a hybrid SAT method for hard problems, employing both look-ahead and CDCL solvers. An important role is played by dedicated look-ahead heuristics, which indeed allowed to solve the problem on a cluster with 800 cores in about 2 days. Due to the general interest in this mathematical problem, our result requires a formal proof. Exploiting recent progress in unsatisfiability proofs of SAT solvers, we produced and verified a proof in the DRAT format, which is almost 200 terabytes in size. From this we extracted and made available a compressed certificate of 68 gigabytes, that allows anyone to reconstruct the DRAT proof for checking.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Unsatisfiable hitting clause-sets with three more clauses than variables

The topic of this paper is the Finiteness Conjecture for minimally unsatisfiable clause-sets (MUs), stating that for each fixed deficiency (number of clauses minus number of variables) there are only finitely many patterns, given a certain basic reduction (generalising unit-clause propagation). We focus our attention on hitting clause-sets (every two clauses have at least one clash), where the conjecture says that there are only finitely many isomorphism types. The Finiteness Conjecture is here known to hold for deficiency at most 2, and we now prove it for deficiency 3. An important tool is the notion of "(ir)reducible clause-sets": we show how to reduce the general question to the irreducible case, and then solve this case (for deficiency 3). This notion comes from number theory (Korec 1984, Berger et al 1990), and we rediscovered it in our studies.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Computing maximal autarkies with few and simple oracle queries

We consider the algorithmic task of computing a maximal autarky for a clause-set F, i.e., a partial assignment which satisfies every clause of F it touches, and where this property is destroyed by adding any non-empty set of further assignments. We employ SAT solvers as oracles, using various capabilities. Using the standard SAT oracle, log_2(n(F)) oracle calls suffice, where n(F) is the number of variables, but the drawback is that (translated) cardinality constraints are employed, which makes this approach less efficient in practice. Using an extended SAT oracle, motivated by the capabilities of modern SAT solvers, we show how to compute maximal autarkies with 2 n(F)^{1/2} simpler oracle calls. This novel algorithm combines the previous two main approaches, based on the autarky-resolution duality and on SAT translations.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Parameters for minimal unsatisfiability: Smarandache primitive numbers and full clauses

We establish a new bridge between propositional logic and elementary number theory. The main objects are &#34;minimally unsatisfiable clause-sets&#34;, short &#34;MUs&#34;, unsatisfiable conjunctive normal forms rendered satisfiable by elimination of any clause. In other words, irredundant coverings of the boolean hypercube by subcubes. The main parameter for MUs is the &#34;deficiency&#34; k, the difference between the number of clauses and the number of variables (the difference between the number of elements in the covering and the dimension of the hypercube), and the fundamental fact is that k >= 1 holds. A &#34;full clause&#34; in an MU contains all variables (corresponding to a singleton in the covering). We show the lower bound S_2(k) <= FCM(k), where FCM(k) is the maximal number of full clauses in MUs of deficiency k, while S_2(k) is the smallest n such that 2^k divides n!. The proof rests on two methods: On the logic-combinatorial side, applying subsumption resolution and its inverse, a fundamental method since Boole in 1854 introduced the &#34;expansion method&#34;. On the arithmetical side, analysing certain recursions, combining an application-specific recursion with a recursion from the field of meta-Fibonacci sequences (indeed S_2 equals twice the Conolly sequence). A further tool is the consideration of unsatisfiable &#34;hitting clause-sets&#34; (UHITs), special cases of MUs, which correspond to the partitions of the boolean hypercube by subcubes; they are also known as orthogonal or disjoint DNF tautologies. We actually show the sharper lower bound S_2(k) <= FCH(k), where FCH(k) is the maximal number of full clauses in UHITs of deficiency k. We conjecture that for all k holds S_2(k) = FCH(k), which would establish a surprising connection between the extremal combinatorics of (un)satisfiability and elementary number theory. We apply the lower bound to analyse the structure of MUs and UHITs.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

A framework for good SAT translations, with applications to CNF representations of XOR constraints

We present a general framework for good CNF-representations of boolean constraints, to be used for translating decision problems into SAT problems (i.e., deciding satisfiability for conjunctive normal forms). We apply it to the representation of systems of XOR-constraints, also known as systems of linear equations over the two-element field, or systems of parity constraints. The general framework defines the notion of &#34;representation&#34;, and provides several methods to measure the quality of the representation by the complexity (&#34;hardness&#34;) needed for making implicit &#34;knowledge&#34; of the representation explicit (to a SAT-solving mechanism). We obtain general upper and lower bounds. Applied to systems of XOR-constraints, we show a super-polynomial lower bound on &#34;good&#34; representations under very general circumstances. A corresponding upper bound shows fixed-parameter tractability in the number of constraints. The measurement underlying this upper bound ignores the auxiliary variables needed for shorter representations of XOR-constraints. Improved upper bounds (for special cases) take them into account, and a rich picture begins to emerge, under the various hardness measurements.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Hardness measures and resolution lower bounds

Various &#34;hardness&#34; measures have been studied for resolution, providing theoretical insight into the proof complexity of resolution and its fragments, as well as explanations for the hardness of instances in SAT solving. In this report we aim at a unified view of a number of hardness measures, including different measures of width, space and size of resolution proofs. We also extend these measures to all clause-sets (possibly satisfiable).

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

On the van der Waerden numbers w(2;3,t)

We present results and conjectures on the van der Waerden numbers w(2;3,t) and on the new palindromic van der Waerden numbers pdw(2;3,t). We have computed the new number w(2;3,19) = 349, and we provide lower bounds for 20 <= t <= 39, where for t <= 30 we conjecture these lower bounds to be exact. The lower bounds for 24 <= t <= 30 refute the conjecture that w(2;3,t) <= t^2, and we present an improved conjecture. We also investigate regularities in the good partitions (certificates) to better understand the lower bounds. Motivated by such reglarities, we introduce *palindromic van der Waerden numbers* pdw(k; t_0,...,t_{k-1}), defined as ordinary van der Waerden numbers w(k; t_0,...,t_{k-1}), however only allowing palindromic solutions (good partitions), defined as reading the same from both ends. Different from the situation for ordinary van der Waerden numbers, these &#34;numbers&#34; need actually to be pairs of numbers. We compute pdw(2;3,t) for 3 <= t <= 27, and we provide lower bounds, which we conjecture to be exact, for t <= 35. All computations are based on SAT solving, and we discuss the various relations between SAT solving and Ramsey theory. Especially we introduce a novel (open-source) SAT solver, the tawSolver, which performs best on the SAT instances studied here, and which is actually the original DLL-solver, but with an efficient implementation and a modern heuristic typical for look-ahead solvers (applying the theory developed in the SAT handbook article of the second author).

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Generalising unit-refutation completeness and SLUR via nested input resolution

We introduce two hierarchies of clause-sets, SLUR_k and UC_k, based on the classes SLUR (Single Lookahead Unit Refutation), introduced in 1995, and UC (Unit refutation Complete), introduced in 1994. The class SLUR, introduced in [Annexstein et al, 1995], is the class of clause-sets for which unit-clause-propagation (denoted by r_1) detects unsatisfiability, or where otherwise iterative assignment, avoiding obviously false assignments by look-ahead, always yields a satisfying assignment. It is natural to consider how to form a hierarchy based on SLUR. Such investigations were started in [Cepek et al, 2012] and [Balyo et al, 2012]. We present what we consider the &#34;limit hierarchy&#34; SLUR_k, based on generalising r_1 by r_k, that is, using generalised unit-clause-propagation introduced in [Kullmann, 1999, 2004]. The class UC, studied in [Del Val, 1994], is the class of Unit refutation Complete clause-sets, that is, those clause-sets for which unsatisfiability is decidable by r_1 under any falsifying assignment. For unsatisfiable clause-sets F, the minimum k such that r_k determines unsatisfiability of F is exactly the &#34;hardness&#34; of F, as introduced in [Ku 99, 04]. For satisfiable F we use now an extension mentioned in [Ansotegui et al, 2008]: The hardness is the minimum k such that after application of any falsifying partial assignments, r_k determines unsatisfiability. The class UC_k is given by the clause-sets which have hardness <= k. We observe that UC_1 is exactly UC. UC_k has a proof-theoretic character, due to the relations between hardness and tree-resolution, while SLUR_k has an algorithmic character. The correspondence between r_k and k-times nested input resolution (or tree resolution using clause-space k+1) means that r_k has a dual nature: both algorithmic and proof theoretic. This corresponds to a basic result of this paper, namely SLUR_k = UC_k.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

On SAT representations of XOR constraints

We study the representation of systems S of linear equations over the two-element field (aka xor- or parity-constraints) via conjunctive normal forms F (boolean clause-sets). First we consider the problem of finding an &#34;arc-consistent&#34; representation (&#34;AC&#34;), meaning that unit-clause propagation will fix all forced assignments for all possible instantiations of the xor-variables. Our main negative result is that there is no polysize AC-representation in general. On the positive side we show that finding such an AC-representation is fixed-parameter tractable (fpt) in the number of equations. Then we turn to a stronger criterion of representation, namely propagation completeness (&#34;PC&#34;) --- while AC only covers the variables of S, now all the variables in F (the variables in S plus auxiliary variables) are considered for PC. We show that the standard translation actually yields a PC representation for one equation, but fails so for two equations (in fact arbitrarily badly). We show that with a more intelligent translation we can also easily compute a translation to PC for two equations. We conjecture that computing a representation in PC is fpt in the number of equations.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Towards a theory of good SAT representations

We aim at providing a foundation of a theory of &#34;good&#34; SAT representations F of boolean functions f. We argue that the hierarchy UC_k of unit-refutation complete clause-sets of level k, introduced by the authors, provides the most basic target classes, that is, F in UC_k is to be achieved for k as small as feasible. If F does not contain new variables, i.e., F is equivalent (as a CNF) to f, then F in UC_1 is similar to &#34;achieving (generalised) arc consistency&#34; known from the literature (it is somewhat weaker, but theoretically much nicer to handle). We show that for polysize representations of boolean functions in this sense, the hierarchy UC_k is strict. The boolean functions for these separations are &#34;doped&#34; minimally unsatisfiable clause-sets of deficiency 1; these functions have been introduced in [Sloan, Soerenyi, Turan, 2007], and we generalise their construction and show a correspondence to a strengthened notion of irredundant sub-clause-sets. Turning from lower bounds to upper bounds, we believe that many common CNF representations fit into the UC_k scheme, and we give some basic tools to construct representations in UC_1 with new variables, based on the Tseitin translation. Note that regarding new variables the UC_1-representations are stronger than mere &#34;arc consistency&#34;, since the new variables are not excluded from consideration.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Trading inference effort versus size in CNF Knowledge Compilation

Knowledge Compilation (KC) studies compilation of boolean functions f into some formalism F, which allows to answer all queries of a certain kind in polynomial time. Due to its relevance for SAT solving, we concentrate on the query type &#34;clausal entailment&#34; (CE), i.e., whether a clause C follows from f or not, and we consider subclasses of CNF, i.e., clause-sets F with special properties. In this report we do not allow auxiliary variables (except of the Outlook), and thus F needs to be equivalent to f. We consider the hierarchies UC_k <= WC_k, which were introduced by the authors in 2012. Each level allows CE queries. The first two levels are well-known classes for KC. Namely UC_0 = WC_0 is the same as PI as studied in KC, that is, f is represented by the set of all prime implicates, while UC_1 = WC_1 is the same as UC, the class of unit-refutation complete clause-sets introduced by del Val 1994. We show that for each k there are (sequences of) boolean functions with polysize representations in UC_{k+1}, but with an exponential lower bound on representations in WC_k. Such a separation was previously only know for k=0. We also consider PC < UC, the class of propagation-complete clause-sets. We show that there are (sequences of) boolean functions with polysize representations in UC, while there is an exponential lower bound for representations in PC. These separations are steps towards a general conjecture determining the representation power of the hierarchies PC_k < UC_k <= WC_k. The strong form of this conjecture also allows auxiliary variables, as discussed in depth in the Outlook.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

On Davis-Putnam reductions for minimally unsatisfiable clause-sets

For investigations into the structure of MU, i.e., minimally unsatisfiable clause-sets or conjunctive normal forms, singular DP-reduction is a fundamental tool, applying DP-reduction F -> DP_v(F) in case variable v occurs in one polarity only once. Recall, in general DP_v(F) replaces all clauses containing variable v by their resolvents on v (another name is &#34;variable elimination&#34;). We consider sDP(F), the set of all results of applying singular DP-reduction to F in MU as long as possible, obtaining non-singular F&#39; in MU with the same deficiency, i.e., delta(F&#39;) = delta(F). (In general, delta(F) is the difference c(F) - n(F) of the number of clauses and the number of variables.) Our main results are: 1. For all F&#39;, F&#34; in sDP(F) we have n(F&#39;) = n(F&#34;). 2. If F is saturated (F in SMU), then we have |sDP(F)| = 1. 3. If F is &#34;eventually saturated&#34;, that is, sDP(F) <= SMU, then for F&#39;, F&#34; in sDP(F) we have F&#39; isomorphic F&#34; (establishing &#34;confluence modulo isomorphism&#34;). The results are obtained by a detailed analysis of singular DP-reduction for F in MU. As an application we obtain that singular DP-reduction for F in MU(2) (i.e., delta(F) = 2) is confluent modulo isomorphism (using the fundamental characterisation of MU(2) by Kleine Buening). The background for these considerations is the general project of the classification of MU in terms of the deficiency.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Constraint satisfaction problems in clausal form

This is the report-version of a mini-series of two articles on the foundations of satisfiability of conjunctive normal forms with non-boolean variables, to appear in Fundamenta Informaticae, 2011. These two parts are here bundled in one report, each part yielding a chapter. Generalised conjunctive normal forms are considered, allowing literals of the form &#34;variable not-equal value&#34;. The first part sets the foundations for the theory of autarkies, with emphasise on matching autarkies. Main results concern various polynomial time results in dependency on the deficiency. The second part considers translations to boolean clause-sets and irredundancy as well as minimal unsatisfiability. Main results concern classification of minimally unsatisfiable clause-sets and the relations to the hermitian rank of graphs. Both parts contain also discussions of many open problems.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

On variables with few occurrences in conjunctive normal forms

We consider the question of the existence of variables with few occurrences in boolean conjunctive normal forms (clause-sets). Let mvd(F) for a clause-set F denote the minimal variable-degree, the minimum of the number of occurrences of variables. Our main result is an upper bound mvd(F) <= nM(surp(F)) <= surp(F) + 1 + log_2(surp(F)) for lean clause-sets F in dependency on the surplus surp(F). - Lean clause-sets, defined as having no non-trivial autarkies, generalise minimally unsatisfiable clause-sets. - For the surplus we have surp(F) <= delta(F) = c(F) - n(F), using the deficiency delta(F) of clause-sets, the difference between the number of clauses and the number of variables. - nM(k) is the k-th &#34;non-Mersenne&#34; number, skipping in the sequence of natural numbers all numbers of the form 2^n - 1. We conjecture that this bound is nearly precise for minimally unsatisfiable clause-sets. As an application of the upper bound we obtain that (arbitrary!) clause-sets F with mvd(F) > nM(surp(F)) must have a non-trivial autarky (so clauses can be removed satisfiability-equivalently by an assignment satisfying some clauses and not touching the other clauses). It is open whether such an autarky can be found in polynomial time. As a future application we discuss the classification of minimally unsatisfiable clause-sets depending on the deficiency.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

Exact Ramsey Theory: Green-Tao numbers and SAT

We consider the links between Ramsey theory in the integers, based on van der Waerden&#39;s theorem, and (boolean, CNF) SAT solving. We aim at using the problems from exact Ramsey theory, concerned with computing Ramsey-type numbers, as a rich source of test problems, where especially methods for solving hard problems can be developed. In order to control the growth of the problem instances, we introduce &#34;transversal extensions&#34; as a natural way of constructing mixed parameter tuples (k_1, ..., k_m) for van-der-Waerden-like numbers N(k_1, ..., k_m), such that the growth of these numbers is guaranteed to be linear. Based on Green-Tao&#39;s theorem we introduce the &#34;Green-Tao numbers&#34; grt(k_1, ..., k_m), which in a sense combine the strict structure of van der Waerden problems with the (pseudo-)randomness of the distribution of prime numbers. Using standard SAT solvers (look-ahead, conflict-driven, and local search) we determine the basic values. It turns out that already for this single form of Ramsey-type problems, when considering the best-performing solvers a wide variety of solver types is covered. For m > 2 the problems are non-boolean, and we introduce the &#34;generic translation scheme&#34;, which offers an infinite variety of translations (&#34;encodings&#34;) and covers the known methods. In most cases the special instance called &#34;nested translation&#34; proved to be far superior.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access