BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Ola Hössjer

Ola Hössjer contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
math.STQuantitative MethodsStatistics TheoryApplicationsastro-ph.COInformation Theorymath.ITMethodologyphysics.data-anphysics.hist-phPopulations and Evolution

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 19 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
5works
0followers
11topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

5 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

A Comparison Between Quantile Regression and Linear Regression on Empirical Quantiles for Phenological Analysis in Migratory Response to Climate Change

It is well established that migratory birds in general have advanced their arrival times in spring, and in this paper we investigate potential ways of enhancing the level of detail in future phenological analyses. We perform single as well as multiple species analyses, using linear models on empirical quantiles, non-parametric quantile regression and likelihood-based parametric quantile regression with asymmetric Laplace distributed error terms. We conclude that non-parametric quantile regression appears most suited for single as well as multiple species analyses.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Active information, missing data and prevalence estimation

The topic of this paper is prevalence estimation from the perspective of active information. Prevalence among tested individuals has an upward bias under the assumption that individuals' willingness to be tested for the disease increases with the strength of their symptoms. Active information due to testing bias quantifies the degree at which the willingness to be tested correlates with infection status. Interpreting incomplete testing as a missing data problem, the missingness mechanism impacts the degree at which the bias of the original prevalence estimate can be removed. The reduction in prevalence, when testing bias is adjusted for, translates into an active information due to bias correction, with opposite sign to active information due to testing bias. Prevalence and active information estimates are asymptotically normal, a behavior also illustrated through simulations.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Classification Under Partial Reject Options

We study set-valued classification for a Bayesian model where data originates from one of a finite number $N$ of possible hypotheses. Thus we consider the scenario where the size of the classified set of categories ranges from 0 to $N$. Empty sets corresponds to an outlier, size 1 represents a firm decision that singles out one hypotheses, size $N$ corresponds to a rejection to classify, whereas sizes $2\ldots,N-1$ represent a partial rejection, where some hypotheses are excluded from further analysis. We introduce a general framework of reward functions with a set-valued argument and derive the corresponding optimal Bayes classifiers, for a homogeneous block of hypotheses and for when hypotheses are partitioned into blocks, where ambiguity within and between blocks are of different severity. We illustrate classification using an ornithological dataset, with taxa partitioned into blocks and parameters estimated using MCMC. The associated reward function's tuning parameters are chosen through cross-validation.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

On the Use of $L$-functionals in Regression Models

In this paper we survey and unify a large class or $L$-functionals of the conditional distribution of the response variable in regression models. This includes robust measures of location, scale, skewness, and heavytailedness of the response, conditionally on covariates. We generalize the concepts of $L$-moments (Sittinen, 1969), $L$-skewness, and $L$-kurtosis (Hosking, 1990) and introduce order numbers for a large class of $L$-functionals through orthogonal series expansions of quantile functions. In particular, we motivate why location, scale, skewness, and heavytailedness have order numbers 1, 2, (3,2), and (4,2) respectively and describe how a family of $L$-functionals, with different order numbers, is constructed from Legendre, Hermite, Laguerre or other types of polynomials. Our framework is applied to models where the relationship between quantiles of the response and the covariates follow a transformed linear model, with a link function that determines the appropriate class of $L$-functionals. In this setting, the distribution of the response is treated parametrically or nonparametrically, and the response variable is either censored/truncated or not. We also provide a unified asymptotic theory of estimates of $L$-functionals, and illustrate our approach by analyzing the arrival time distribution of migrating birds. In this context a novel version of the coefficient of determination is introduced, which makes use of the abovementioned orthogonal series expansion.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Sometimes size does not matter

Cosmological fine-tuning has traditionally been associated with the narrowness of the intervals in which the parameters of the physical models must be located to make life possible. A more thorough approach focuses on the probability of the interval, not on its size. Most attempts to measure the probability of the life-permitting interval for a given parameter rely on a Bayesian statistical approach for which the prior distribution of the parameter is uniform. However, the parameters in these models often take values in spaces of infinite size, so that a uniformity assumption is not possible. This is known as the normalization problem. This paper explains a framework to measure tuning that, among others, deals with normalization, assuming that the prior distribution belongs to a class of maximum entropy (maxent) distributions. By analyzing an upper bound of the tuning probability for this class of distributions the method solves the so-called weak anthropic principle, and offer a solution, at least in this context, to the well-known lack of invariance of maxent distributions. The implication of this approach is that, since all mathematical models need parameters, tuning is not only a question of natural science, but also a problem of mathematical modeling. Cosmological tuning is thus a particular instantiation of a more general scenario. Therefore, whenever a mathematical model is used to describe nature, not only in physics but in all of science, tuning is present. And the question of whether the tuning is fine or coarse for a given parameter -- if the interval in which the parameter is located has low or high probability, respectively -- depends crucially not only on the interval but also on the assumed class of prior distributions. Novel upper bounds for tuning probabilities are presented.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access