BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Oana-Iuliana Popescu

Oana-Iuliana Popescu contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Artificial IntelligenceComputer VisionMachine LearningHuman-Computer Interaction

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Do Users Benefit From Interpretable Vision? A User Study, Baseline, And Dataset

A variety of methods exist to explain image classification models. However, whether they provide any benefit to users over simply comparing various inputs and the model's respective predictions remains unclear. We conducted a user study (N=240) to test how such a baseline explanation technique performs against concept-based and counterfactual explanations. To this end, we contribute a synthetic dataset generator capable of biasing individual attributes and quantifying their relevance to the model. In a study, we assess if participants can identify the relevant set of attributes compared to the ground-truth. Our results show that the baseline outperformed concept-based explanations. Counterfactual explanations from an invertible neural network performed similarly as the baseline. Still, they allowed users to identify some attributes more accurately. Our results highlight the importance of measuring how well users can reason about biases of a model, rather than solely relying on technical evaluations or proxy tasks. We open-source our study and dataset so it can serve as a blue-print for future studies. For code see, https://github.com/berleon/do_users_benefit_from_interpretable_vision

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Counterfactual Generation with Knockoffs

Human interpretability of deep neural networks' decisions is crucial, especially in domains where these directly affect human lives. Counterfactual explanations of already trained neural networks can be generated by perturbing input features and attributing importance according to the change in the classifier's outcome after perturbation. Perturbation can be done by replacing features using heuristic or generative in-filling methods. The choice of in-filling function significantly impacts the number of artifacts, i.e., false-positive attributions. Heuristic methods result in false-positive artifacts because the image after the perturbation is far from the original data distribution. Generative in-filling methods reduce artifacts by producing in-filling values that respect the original data distribution. However, current generative in-filling methods may also increase false-negatives due to the high correlation of in-filling values with the original data. In this paper, we propose to alleviate this by generating in-fillings with the statistically-grounded Knockoffs framework, which was developed by Barber and Candès in 2015 as a tool for variable selection with controllable false discovery rate. Knockoffs are statistically null-variables as decorrelated as possible from the original data, which can be swapped with the originals without changing the underlying data distribution. A comparison of different in-filling methods indicates that in-filling with knockoffs can reveal explanations in a more causal sense while still maintaining the compactness of the explanations.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access