Source author record

Norbert Bus

Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

Research overview

1works
1topics
3close collaborators

Published work

1 publications

preprint2015arXiv

Tighter Estimates for epsilon-nets for Disks

The geometric hitting set problem is one of the basic geometric combinatorial optimization problems: given a set PP of points, and a set D\mathcal{D} of geometric objects in the plane, the goal is to compute a small-sized subset of PP that hits all objects in D\mathcal{D}. In 1994, Bronniman and Goodrich made an important connection of this problem to the size of fundamental combinatorial structures called εε-nets, showing that small-sized εε-nets imply approximation algorithms with correspondingly small approximation ratios. Very recently, Agarwal and Pan showed that their scheme can be implemented in near-linear time for disks in the plane. Altogether this gives O(1)O(1)-factor approximation algorithms in O~(n)\tilde{O}(n) time for hitting sets for disks in the plane. This constant factor depends on the sizes of εε-nets for disks; unfortunately, the current state-of-the-art bounds are large -- at least 24/ε24/ε and most likely larger than 40/ε40/ε. Thus the approximation factor of the Agarwal and Pan algorithm ends up being more than 4040. The best lower-bound is 2/ε2/ε, which follows from the Pach-Woeginger construction for halfspaces in two dimensions. Thus there is a large gap between the best-known upper and lower bounds. Besides being of independent interest, finding precise bounds is important since this immediately implies an improved linear-time algorithm for the hitting-set problem. The main goal of this paper is to improve the upper-bound to 13.4/ε13.4/ε for disks in the plane. The proof is constructive, giving a simple algorithm that uses only Delaunay triangulations. We have implemented the algorithm, which is available as a public open-source module. Experimental results show that the sizes of εε-nets for a variety of data-sets is lower, around 9/ε9/ε.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.