BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Nicolas Rodriguez

Nicolas Rodriguez appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
Molecular NetworksArtificial IntelligenceHuman-Computer InteractionRobotics

Catalog footprint

What is connected

3works
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Perception-Intention-Action Cycle in Human-Robot Collaborative Tasks

In this work we argue that in Human-Robot Collaboration (HRC) tasks, the Perception-Action cycle in HRC tasks can not fully explain the collaborative behaviour of the human and robot and it has to be extended to Perception-Intention-Action cycle, where Intention is a key topic. In some cases, agent Intention can be perceived or inferred by the other agent, but in others, it has to be explicitly informed to the other agent to succeed the goal of the HRC task. The Perception-Intention-Action cycle includes three basic functional procedures: Perception-Intention, Situation Awareness and Action. The Perception and the Intention are the input of the Situation Awareness, which evaluates the current situation and projects it, into the future situation. The agents receive this information, plans and agree with the actions to be executed and modify their action roles while perform the HRC task. In this work, we validate the Perception-Intention-Action cycle in a joint object transportation task, modeling the Perception-Intention-Action cycle through a force model which uses real life and social forces. The perceived world is projected into a force world and the human intention (perceived or informed) is also modelled as a force that acts in the HRC task. Finally, we show that the action roles (master-slave, collaborative, neutral or adversary) are intrinsic to any HRC task and they appear in the different steps of a collaborative sequence of actions performed during the task.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Large-scale generation of computational models from biochemical pathway maps

Background: Systems biology projects and omics technologies have led to a growing number of biochemical pathway reconstructions. However, mathematical models are still most often created de novo, based on reading the literature and processing pathway data manually. Results: To increase the efficiency with which such models can be created, we automatically generated mathematical models from pathway representations using a suite of freely available software. We produced models that combine data from KEGG PATHWAY, BioCarta, MetaCyc and SABIO-RK; According to the source data, three types of models are provided: kinetic, logical and constraint-based. All models are encoded using SBML Core and Qual packages, and available through BioModels Database. Each model contains the list of participants, the interactions, and the relevant mathematical constructs, but, in most cases, no meaningful parameter values. Most models are also available as easy to understand graphical SBGN maps. Conclusions: to date, the project has resulted in more than 140000 models freely available. We believe this resource can tremendously accelerate the development of mathematical models by providing initial starting points ready for parametrization.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

SBML Qualitative Models: a model representation format and infrastructure to foster interactions between qualitative modelling formalisms and tools

Background: Qualitative frameworks, especially those based on the logical discrete formalism, are increasingly used to model regulatory and signalling networks. A major advantage of these frameworks is that they do not require precise quantitative data, and that they are well-suited for studies of large networks. While numerous groups have developed specific computational tools that provide original methods to analyse qualitative models, a standard format to exchange qualitative models has been missing. Results: We present the System Biology Markup Language (SBML) Qualitative Models Package ("qual"), an extension of the SBML Level 3 standard designed for computer representation of qualitative models of biological networks. We demonstrate the interoperability of models via SBML qual through the analysis of a specific signalling network by three independent software tools. Furthermore, the cooperative development of the SBML qual format paved the way for the development of LogicalModel, an open-source model library, which will facilitate the adoption of the format as well as the collaborative development of algorithms to analyze qualitative models. Conclusion: SBML qual allows the exchange of qualitative models among a number of complementary software tools. SBML qual has the potential to promote collaborative work on the development of novel computational approaches, as well as on the specification and the analysis of comprehensive qualitative models of regulatory and signalling networks.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access