Source author record

Nicola Galesi

Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

Research overview

4works
5topics
4close collaborators

Published work

4 publications

preprint2021arXiv

Counting and localizing defective nodes by Boolean network tomography

Identifying defective items in larger sets is a main problem with many applications in real life situations. We consider the problem of localizing defective nodes in networks through an approach based on boolean network tomography (BNT), which is grounded on inferring informations from the boolean outcomes of end-to-end measurements paths. {\em Identifiability} conditions on the set of paths which guarantee discovering or counting unambiguously the defective nodes are of course very relevant. We investigate old and introduce new identifiability conditions contributing this problem both from a theoretical and applied perspective. (1) What is the precise tradeoff between number of nodes and number of paths such that at most kk nodes can be identified unambiguously ? The answer is known only for k=1k=1 and we answer the question for any kk, setting a problem implicitly left open in previous works. (2) We study upper and lower bounds on the number of unambiguously identifiable nodes, introducing new identifiability conditions which strictly imply and are strictly implied by unambiguous identifiability; (3) We use these new conditions on one side to design algorithmic heuristics to count defective nodes in a fine-grained way, on the other side to prove the first complexity hardness results on the problem of identifying defective nodes in networks via BNT. (4) We introduce a random model where we study lower bounds on the number of unambiguously identifiable defective nodes and we use this model to estimate that number on real networks by a maximum likelihood estimate approach

preprint2015arXiv

Space proof complexity for random 3-CNFs

We investigate the space complexity of refuting 33-CNFs in Resolution and algebraic systems. We prove that every Polynomial Calculus with Resolution refutation of a random 33-CNF ϕϕ in nn variables requires, with high probability, Ω(n)Ω(n) distinct monomials to be kept simultaneously in memory. The same construction also proves that every Resolution refutation ϕϕ requires, with high probability, Ω(n)Ω(n) clauses each of width Ω(n)Ω(n) to be kept at the same time in memory. This gives a Ω(n2)Ω(n^2) lower bound for the total space needed in Resolution to refute ϕϕ. These results are best possible (up to a constant factor). The main technical innovation is a variant of Hall's Lemma. We show that in bipartite graphs GG with bipartition (L,R)(L,R) and left-degree at most 3, LL can be covered by certain families of disjoint paths, called VW-matchings, provided that LL expands in RR by a factor of (2−ε)(2-ε), for ε<1/23ε< 1/23.

preprint2014arXiv

Space proof complexity for random 33-CNFs via a (2−ε)(2-ε)-Hall's Theorem

We investigate the space complexity of refuting 33-CNFs in Resolution and algebraic systems. No lower bound for refuting any family of 33-CNFs was previously known for the total space in resolution or for the monomial space in algebraic systems. We prove that every Polynomial Calculus with Resolution refutation of a random 33-CNF ϕϕ in nn variables requires, with high probability, Ω(n/log⁡n)Ω(n/\log n) distinct monomials to be kept simultaneously in memory. The same construction also proves that every Resolution refutation ϕϕ requires, with high probability, Ω(n/log⁡n)Ω(n/\log n) clauses each of width Ω(n/log⁡n)Ω(n/\log n) to be kept at the same time in memory. This gives a Ω(n2/log⁡2n)Ω(n^2/\log^2 n) lower bound for the total space needed in Resolution to refute ϕϕ. The main technical innovation is a variant of Hall's theorem. We show that in bipartite graphs GG with bipartition (L,R)(L,R) and left-degree at most 3, LL can be covered by certain families of disjoint paths, called (2,4)(2,4)-matchings, provided that LL expands in RR by a factor of (2−ε)(2-ε), for ε<123ε< \frac{1}{23}.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.