Source author record

Nicholas Cain

Nicholas Cain appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Neurons and Cognition Artificial Intelligence Computer Vision Machine Learning

Catalog footprint

What is connected

3works

4topics

4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Open graph Browse works

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

preprint2022arXiv

Mitigating Bias in Calibration Error Estimation

For an AI system to be reliable, the confidence it expresses in its decisions must match its accuracy. To assess the degree of match, examples are typically binned by confidence and the per-bin mean confidence and accuracy are compared. Most research in calibration focuses on techniques to reduce this empirical measure of calibration error, ECE_bin. We instead focus on assessing statistical bias in this empirical measure, and we identify better estimators. We propose a framework through which we can compute the bias of a particular estimator for an evaluation data set of a given size. The framework involves synthesizing model outputs that have the same statistics as common neural architectures on popular data sets. We find that binning-based estimators with bins of equal mass (number of instances) have lower bias than estimators with bins of equal width. Our results indicate two reliable calibration-error estimators: the debiased estimator (Brocker, 2012; Ferro and Fricker, 2012) and a method we propose, ECE_sweep, which uses equal-mass bins and chooses the number of bins to be as large as possible while preserving monotonicity in the calibration function. With these estimators, we observe improvements in the effectiveness of recalibration methods and in the detection of model miscalibration.

preprint2012arXiv

Impact of correlated neural activity on decision making performance

Stimulus from the environment that guides behavior and informs decisions is encoded in the firing rates of neural populations. Each neuron in the populations, however, does not spike independently: spike events are correlated from cell to cell. To what degree does this apparent redundancy impact the accuracy with which decisions can be made, and the computations that are required to optimally decide? We explore these questions for two illustrative models of correlation among cells. Each model is statistically identical at the level of pairs cells, but differs in higher-order statistics that describe the simultaneous activity of larger cell groups. We find that the presence of correlations can diminish the performance attained by an ideal decision maker to either a small or large extent, depending on the nature of the higher-order interactions. Moreover, while this optimal performance can in some cases be obtained via the standard integration-to-bound operation, in others it requires a nonlinear computation on incoming spikes. Overall, we conclude that a given level of pairwise correlations--even when restricted to identical neural populations--may not always indicate redundancies that diminish decision making performance.

preprint2011arXiv

Neural integrators for decision making: A favorable tradeoff between robustness and sensitivity

A key step in many perceptual decision tasks is the integration of sensory inputs over time, but fundamental questions remain about how this is accomplished in neural circuits. One possibility is to balance decay modes of membranes and synapses with recurrent excitation. To allow integration over long timescales, however, this balance must be precise; this is known as the fine tuning problem. The need for fine tuning can be overcome via a ratchet-like mechanism, in which momentary inputs must be above a preset limit to be registered by the circuit. The degree of this ratcheting embodies a tradeoff between sensitivity to the input stream and robustness against parameter mistuning. The goal of our study is to analyze the consequences of this tradeoff for decision making performance. For concreteness, we focus on the well-studied random dot motion discrimination task. For stimulus parameters constrained by experimental data, we find that loss of sensitivity to inputs has surprisingly little cost for decision performance. This leads robust integrators to performance gains when feedback becomes mistuned. Moreover, we find that substantially robust and mistuned integrator models remain consistent with chronometric and accuracy functions found in experiments. We explain our findings via sequential analysis of the momentary and integrated signals, and discuss their implication: robust integrators may be surprisingly well-suited to subserve the basic function of evidence integration in many cognitive tasks.