Researcher profile

Natesh Pillai

Natesh Pillai contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
6topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Rate-optimal refinement strategies for local approximation MCMC

Many Bayesian inference problems involve target distributions whose density functions are computationally expensive to evaluate. Replacing the target density with a local approximation based on a small number of carefully chosen density evaluations can significantly reduce the computational expense of Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling. Moreover, continual refinement of the local approximation can guarantee asymptotically exact sampling. We devise a new strategy for balancing the decay rate of the bias due to the approximation with that of the MCMC variance. We prove that the error of the resulting local approximation MCMC (LA-MCMC) algorithm decays at roughly the expected $1/\sqrt{T}$ rate, and we demonstrate this rate numerically. We also introduce an algorithmic parameter that guarantees convergence given very weak tail bounds, significantly strengthening previous convergence results. Finally, we apply LA-MCMC to a computationally intensive Bayesian inverse problem arising in groundwater hydrology.

preprint2018arXiv

Diagnosing missing always at random in multivariate data

Models for analyzing multivariate data sets with missing values require strong, often unassessable, assumptions. The most common of these is that the mechanism that created the missing data is ignorable - a twofold assumption dependent on the mode of inference. The first part, which is the focus here, under the Bayesian and direct-likelihood paradigms, requires that the missing data are missing at random; in contrast, the frequentist-likelihood paradigm demands that the missing data mechanism always produces missing at random data, a condition known as missing always at random. Under certain regularity conditions, assuming missing always at random leads to an assumption that can be tested using the observed data alone namely, the missing data indicators only depend on fully observed variables. Here, we propose three different diagnostic tests that not only indicate when this assumption is incorrect but also suggest which variables are the most likely culprits. Although missing always at random is not a necessary condition to ensure validity under the Bayesian and direct-likelihood paradigms, it is sufficient, and evidence for its violation should encourage the careful statistician to conduct targeted sensitivity analyses.