BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Naomi Nishimura

Naomi Nishimura appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
Data Structures and AlgorithmsComputational ComplexityDiscrete Mathematicsmath.CODistributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing

Catalog footprint

What is connected

7works
5topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

7 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

A survey on the parameterized complexity of the independent set and (connected) dominating set reconfiguration problems

A graph vertex-subset problem defines which subsets of the vertices of an input graph are feasible solutions. We view a feasible solution as a set of tokens placed on the vertices of the graph. A reconfiguration variant of a vertex-subset problem asks, given two feasible solutions of size $k$, whether it is possible to transform one into the other by a sequence of token slides (along edges of the graph) or token jumps (between arbitrary vertices of the graph) such that each intermediate set remains a feasible solution of size $k$. Many algorithmic questions present themselves in the form of reconfiguration problems: Given the description of an initial system state and the description of a target state, is it possible to transform the system from its initial state into the target one while preserving certain properties of the system in the process? Such questions have received a substantial amount of attention under the so-called combinatorial reconfiguration framework. We consider reconfiguration variants of three fundamental underlying graph vertex-subset problems, namely Independent Set, Dominating Set, and Connected Dominating Set. We survey both older and more recent work on the parameterized complexity of all three problems when parameterized by the number of tokens $k$. The emphasis will be on positive results and the most common techniques for the design of fixed-parameter tractable algorithms.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

The complexity of dominating set reconfiguration

Suppose that we are given two dominating sets $D_s$ and $D_t$ of a graph $G$ whose cardinalities are at most a given threshold $k$. Then, we are asked whether there exists a sequence of dominating sets of $G$ between $D_s$ and $D_t$ such that each dominating set in the sequence is of cardinality at most $k$ and can be obtained from the previous one by either adding or deleting exactly one vertex. This problem is known to be PSPACE-complete in general. In this paper, we study the complexity of this decision problem from the viewpoint of graph classes. We first prove that the problem remains PSPACE-complete even for planar graphs, bounded bandwidth graphs, split graphs, and bipartite graphs. We then give a general scheme to construct linear-time algorithms and show that the problem can be solved in linear time for cographs, trees, and interval graphs. Furthermore, for these tractable cases, we can obtain a desired sequence such that the number of additions and deletions is bounded by $O(n)$, where $n$ is the number of vertices in the input graph.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Reconfiguration of Dominating Sets

We explore a reconfiguration version of the dominating set problem, where a dominating set in a graph $G$ is a set $S$ of vertices such that each vertex is either in $S$ or has a neighbour in $S$. In a reconfiguration problem, the goal is to determine whether there exists a sequence of feasible solutions connecting given feasible solutions $s$ and $t$ such that each pair of consecutive solutions is adjacent according to a specified adjacency relation. Two dominating sets are adjacent if one can be formed from the other by the addition or deletion of a single vertex. For various values of $k$, we consider properties of $D_k(G)$, the graph consisting of a vertex for each dominating set of size at most $k$ and edges specified by the adjacency relation. Addressing an open question posed by Haas and Seyffarth, we demonstrate that $D_{Γ(G)+1}(G)$ is not necessarily connected, for $Γ(G)$ the maximum cardinality of a minimal dominating set in $G$. The result holds even when graphs are constrained to be planar, of bounded tree-width, or $b$-partite for $b \ge 3$. Moreover, we construct an infinite family of graphs such that $D_{γ(G)+1}(G)$ has exponential diameter, for $γ(G)$ the minimum size of a dominating set. On the positive side, we show that $D_{n-m}(G)$ is connected and of linear diameter for any graph $G$ on $n$ vertices having at least $m+1$ independent edges.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Reconfiguration over tree decompositions

A vertex-subset graph problem $Q$ defines which subsets of the vertices of an input graph are feasible solutions. The reconfiguration version of a vertex-subset problem $Q$ asks whether it is possible to transform one feasible solution for $Q$ into another in at most $\ell$ steps, where each step is a vertex addition or deletion, and each intermediate set is also a feasible solution for $Q$ of size bounded by $k$. Motivated by recent results establishing W[1]-hardness of the reconfiguration versions of most vertex-subset problems parameterized by $\ell$, we investigate the complexity of such problems restricted to graphs of bounded treewidth. We show that the reconfiguration versions of most vertex-subset problems remain PSPACE-complete on graphs of treewidth at most $t$ but are fixed-parameter tractable parameterized by $\ell + t$ for all vertex-subset problems definable in monadic second-order logic (MSOL). To prove the latter result, we introduce a technique which allows us to circumvent cardinality constraints and define reconfiguration problems in MSOL.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Shortest reconfiguration paths in the solution space of Boolean formulas

Given a Boolean formula and a satisfying assignment, a flip is an operation that changes the value of a variable in the assignment so that the resulting assignment remains satisfying. We study the problem of computing the shortest sequence of flips (if one exists) that transforms a given satisfying assignment $s$ to another satisfying assignment $t$ of a Boolean formula. Earlier work characterized the complexity of finding any (not necessarily the shortest) sequence of flips from one satisfying assignment to another using Schaefer's framework for classification of Boolean formulas. We build on it to provide a trichotomy for the complexity of finding the shortest sequence of flips and show that it is either in P, NP-complete, or PSPACE-complete. Our result adds to the small set of complexity results known for shortest reconfiguration sequence problems by providing an example where the shortest sequence can be found in polynomial time even though its length is not equal to the symmetric difference of the values of the variables in $s$ and $t$. This is in contrast to all reconfiguration problems studied so far, where polynomial time algorithms for computing the shortest path were known only for cases where the path modified the symmetric difference only.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

An Easy-to-use Scalable Framework for Parallel Recursive Backtracking

Supercomputers are equipped with an increasingly large number of cores to use computational power as a way of solving problems that are otherwise intractable. Unfortunately, getting serial algorithms to run in parallel to take advantage of these computational resources remains a challenge for several application domains. Many parallel algorithms can scale to only hundreds of cores. The limiting factors of such algorithms are usually communication overhead and poor load balancing. Solving NP-hard graph problems to optimality using exact algorithms is an example of an area in which there has so far been limited success in obtaining large scale parallelism. Many of these algorithms use recursive backtracking as their core solution paradigm. In this paper, we propose a lightweight, easy-to-use, scalable framework for transforming almost any recursive backtracking algorithm into a parallel one. Our framework incurs minimal communication overhead and guarantees a load-balancing strategy that is implicit, i.e., does not require any problem-specific knowledge. The key idea behind this framework is the use of an indexed search tree approach that is oblivious to the problem being solved. We test our framework with parallel implementations of algorithms for the well-known Vertex Cover and Dominating Set problems. On sufficiently hard instances, experimental results show linear speedups for thousands of cores, reducing running times from days to just a few minutes.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

On the Parameterized Complexity of Reconfiguration Problems

We present the first results on the parameterized complexity of reconfiguration problems, where a reconfiguration version of an optimization problem $Q$ takes as input two feasible solutions $S$ and $T$ and determines if there is a sequence of {\em reconfiguration steps} that can be applied to transform $S$ into $T$ such that each step results in a feasible solution to $Q$. For most of the results in this paper, $S$ and $T$ are subsets of vertices of a given graph and a reconfiguration step adds or deletes a vertex. Our study is motivated by recent results establishing that for most NP-hard problems, the classical complexity of reconfiguration is PSPACE-complete. We address the question for several important graph properties under two natural parameterizations: $k$, the size of the solutions, and $\ell$, the length of the sequence of steps. Our first general result is an algorithmic paradigm, the {\em reconfiguration kernel}, used to obtain fixed-parameter algorithms for the reconfiguration versions of {\sc Vertex Cover} and, more generally, {\sc Bounded Hitting Set} and {\sc Feedback Vertex Set}, all parameterized by $k$. In contrast, we show that reconfiguring {\sc Unbounded Hitting Set} is $W[2]$-hard when parameterized by $k+\ell$. We also demonstrate the $W[1]$-hardness of the reconfiguration versions of a large class of maximization problems parameterized by $k+\ell$, and of their corresponding deletion problems parameterized by $\ell$; in doing so, we show that there exist problems in FPT when parameterized by $k$, but whose reconfiguration versions are $W[1]$-hard when parameterized by $k+\ell$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access