Source author record

Naftaly H. Minsky

Naftaly H. Minsky appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

2works
3topics
1close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Discriminating Defense Against DDoS Attacks; a Novel Approach

A recent paper (circa 2020) by Osterwile et al., entitled "21 Years of Distributed Denial of Service: A Call to Action", states: "We are falling behind in the war against distributed denial-of-service attacks. Unless we act now, the future of the Internet could be at stake." And an earlier (circa 2007) paper by Peng et al. states: "a key challenge for the defense [against DDoS attacks] is how to discriminate legitimate requests for service from malicious access attempts." This challenge has not been met yet, which is, arguably, a major reason for the dire situation described by Osterwile et al. -- thirteen years later. This paper attempts to meet an approximation to this challenge, by enabling a a site to define the kind of messages that it considers important, and by introducing an unambiguous criterion of discrimination between messages that a given site considers important, and all other messages sent to it. Two anti-DDoS mechanisms based on this criterion are introduced in this paper. One of these relies on lightweight support by routers; and the other one does not.

preprint2014arXiv

Establishing Global Policies over Decentralized Online Social Networks

Conventional online social networks (OSNs) are implemented in a centralized manner. Although centralization is a convenient way for implementing OSNs, it has several well known drawbacks. Chief among them are the risks they pose to the security and privacy of the information maintained by the OSN; and the loss of control over the information contributed by individual members. These concerns prompted several attempts to create decentralized OSNs, or DOSNs. The basic idea underlying these attempts, is that each member of a social network keeps its data under its own control, instead of surrendering it to a central host; providing access to it to other members of the OSN according to its own access-control policy. Unfortunately all existing DOSN projects have a very serious limitation. Namely, they are unable to subject the membership of a DOSN, and the interaction between its members, to any global policy. We adopt the decentralization idea underlying DOSNs, complementing it with a means for specifying and enforcing a wide range of policies over the membership of a social community, and over the interaction between its disparate distributed members. And we do so in a scalable fashion.