BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Mrdjan Jankovic

Mrdjan Jankovic contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
eess.SYSystems and ControlRobotics

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Multi-agent systems with CBF-based controllers -- collision avoidance and liveness from instability

Assuring system stability is typically a major control design objective. In this paper, we present a system where instability provides a crucial benefit. We consider multi-agent collision avoidance using Control Barrier Functions (CBF) and study trade-offs between safety and liveness -- the ability to reach a destination without large detours or gridlock. We compare two standard decentralized policies, with only the local (host) control available, to co-optimization policies (PCCA and CCS) where everyone's (virtual) control action is available. The co-optimization policies compute control for everyone even though they lack information about others' intentions. For comparison, we use a Centralized, full information policy as the benchmark. One contribution of this paper is proving feasibility for the Centralized, PCCA, and CCS policies. Monte Carlo simulations show that decentralized, host-only control policies and CCS lack liveness while the PCCA policy performs as well as the Centralized. Next, we explain the observed results by considering two agents negotiating the passing order through an intersection. We show that the structure and stability of the resulting equilibria correlates with the observed propensity to gridlock -- the policies with unstable equilibria avoid gridlocks while those with stable ones do not.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Prescribed-Time Safety Design for a Chain of Integrators

Safety in dynamical systems is commonly pursued using control barrier functions (CBFs) which enforce safety-constraints over the entire duration of a system's evolution. We propose a prescribed-time safety (PTSf) design which enforces safety only for a finite time of interest to the user. While traditional CBF designs would keep the system away from the barrier longer than necessary, our PTSf design lets the system reach the barrier by the prescribed time and obey the operator's intent thereafter. To emphasize the capability of our design for safety constraints with high relative degrees, we focus our exposition on a chain of integrators where the safety condition is defined for the state furthest from the control input. In contrast to existing CBF-based methods for high-relative degree constraints, our approach involves choosing explicitly specified gains (instead of class $\mathcal{K}$ functions), and, with the aid of backstepping, operates in the entirety of the original safe set with no additional restriction on the initial conditions. With Quadratic Programming (QP) being employed in the design, in addition to backstepping and CBFs with a PTSf property, we refer to our design as a QP-backstepping PT-CBF design. For illustration, we include a simulation for the double-integrator system.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Robust AI Driving Strategy for Autonomous Vehicles

There has been significant progress in sensing, perception, and localization for automated driving, However, due to the wide spectrum of traffic/road structure scenarios and the long tail distribution of human driver behavior, it has remained an open challenge for an intelligent vehicle to always know how to make and execute the best decision on road given available sensing / perception / localization information. In this chapter, we talk about how artificial intelligence and more specifically, reinforcement learning, can take advantage of operational knowledge and safety reflex to make strategical and tactical decisions. We discuss some challenging problems related to the robustness of reinforcement learning solutions and their implications to the practical design of driving strategies for autonomous vehicles. We focus on automated driving on highway and the integration of reinforcement learning, vehicle motion control, and control barrier function, leading to a robust AI driving strategy that can learn and adapt safely.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Collision Free Navigation with Interacting, Non-Communicating Obstacles

In this paper we consider the problem of navigation and motion control in an area densely populated with other agents. We propose an algorithm that, without explicit communication and based on the information it has, computes the best control action for all the agents and implements its own. Notably, the host agent (the agent executing the algorithm) computes the differences between the other agents' computed and observed control actions and treats them as known disturbances that are fed back into a robust control barrier function (RCBF) based quadratic program. A feedback loop is created because the computed control action for another agent depends on the previously used disturbance estimate. In the case of two interacting agents, stability of the feedback loop is proven and a performance guarantee in terms of constraint adherence is established. This holds whether the other agent executes the same algorithm or not.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access