Source author record

Moshe Roitman

Moshe Roitman appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

4works
3topics
3close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

On the Gleason-Kahane-Żelazko theorem for associative algebras

The classical Gleason-Kahane-Żelazko Theorem states that a linear functional on a complex Banach algebra not vanishing on units, and such that $Λ(\mathbf 1)=1$, is multiplicative, that is, $Λ(ab)=Λ(a)Λ(b)$ for all $a,b\in A$. We study the GKŻ property for associative unital algebras, especially for function algebras. In a GKŻ algebra $A$ over a field of at least $3$ elements, and having an ideal of codimension $1$, every element is a finite sum of units. A real or complex algebra with just countably many maximal left (right) ideals, is a GKŻ algebra. If $A$ is a commutative algebra, then the localisation $A_{P}$ is a GKŻ-algebra for every prime ideal $P$ of $A$. Hence the GKŻ property is not a local-global property. The class of GKŻ algebras is closed under homomorphic images. If a function algebra $A\subseteq \mathbb F^{X}$ over a subfield $\mathbb F$ of $\mathbb C$, contains all the bounded functions in $\mathbb F^{X}$, then each element of $A$ is a sum of two units. If $A$ contains also a discrete function, then $A$ is a GKŻ algebra. We prove that the algebra of periodic distributions, and the unitisation of the algebra of distributions with support in $(0,\infty)$ satisfy the GKŻ property, while the algebra of compactly supported distributions does not.

preprint2020arXiv

On finitely stable domains

We study Archimedean and locally Archimedean stable domains. We prove that a domain is stable and one-dimensional if and only if it is finitely stable and Mori. But we give examples of Archimedean stable local domains that are not one-dimensional. We also prove that a locally Archimedean stable domain satisfies accp and that Archimedean stable semilocal domains are locally Archimedean. But generally, neither Archimedean stable domains, nor Archimedean semilocal domains are necessarily locally Archimedean.

preprint2020arXiv

On strongly primary monoids and domains

A commutative integral domain is primary if and only if it is one-dimensional and local. A domain is strongly primary if and only if it is local and each nonzero principal ideal contains a power of the maximal ideal. Hence one-dimensional local Mori domains are strongly primary. We prove among other results, that if $R$ is a domain such that the conductor $(R:\widehat R)$ vanishes, then $Λ(R)$ is finite, that is, there exists a positive integer $k$ such that each non-zero non-unit of $R$ is a product of at most $k$ irreducible elements. Using this result we obtain that every strongly primary domain is locally tame, and that a domain $R$ is globally tame if and only if $Λ(R)=\infty$. In particular, we answer Problem 38 in {P.-J. Cahen, M.~Fontana, S.~Frisch, and S.~Glaz, Open problems in commutative ring theory, Commutative Algebra, Springer 2014} in the affirmative. Many of our results are formulated for monoids.

preprint2011arXiv

The Kaplansky condition and rings of almost stable range 1

We present some variants of the Kaplansky condition for a K-Hermite ring $R$ to be an elementary divisor ring; for example, a commutative K-Hermite ring $R$ is an EDR iff for any elements $x,y,z\in R$ such that $(x,y)=(1)$, there exists an element $λ\in R$ such that $x+λy=uv$, where $(u,z)=(v,1-z)=(1)$. We present an example of a a Bézout domain that is an elementary divisor ring, but it does not have almost stable range 1, thus answering a question of Warren Wm. McGovern.