BZPEERSource author record
Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.
Catalog footprint
Published work
We prove that, for every separable complex Hilbert space H, every weak-2-local ∗-derivation on B(H) is a linear ∗-derivation. We also establish that every (non-necessarily linear nor continuous) weak-2-local derivation on a finite dimensional C∗-algebra is a linear derivation.
We introduce the notion of weak-2-local derivation (respectively, ∗-derivation) on a C∗-algebra A as a (non-necessarily linear) map Δ:A→A satisfying that for every a,b∈A and ϕ∈A∗ there exists a derivation (respectively, a ∗-derivation) Da,b,ϕ:A→A, depending on a, b and ϕ, such that ϕΔ(a)=ϕDa,b,ϕ(a) and ϕΔ(b)=ϕDa,b,ϕ(b). We prove that every weak-2-local ∗-derivation on Mn is a linear derivation. We also show that the same conclusion remains true for weak-2-local ∗-derivations on finite dimensional C∗-algebras.
We prove that, for a complex Hilbert space H with dimension bigger or equal than three, every linear mapping T:B(H)→B(H) satisfying the 3-local property is a ∗-monomorphism, that is, every linear mapping T:B(H)→B(H) satisfying that for every a in B(H) and every ξ,η in H, there exists a ∗-automorphism πa,ξ,η:B(H)→B(H), depending on a, ξ, and η, such that T(a)(ξ)=πa,ξ,η(a)(ξ), and T(a)(η)=πa,ξ,η(a)(η), is a ∗-monomorphism. This solves a question posed by L. Molnár in [\emph{Arch. Math.} \textbf{102}, 83-89 (2014)].
Research graph
Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.
BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.