BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Mohammad Mamouei

Mohammad Mamouei contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Machine LearningArtificial Intelligence

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Clinical outcome prediction under hypothetical interventions -- a representation learning framework for counterfactual reasoning

Most machine learning (ML) models are developed for prediction only; offering no option for causal interpretation of their predictions or parameters/properties. This can hamper the health systems' ability to employ ML models in clinical decision-making processes, where the need and desire for predicting outcomes under hypothetical investigations (i.e., counterfactual reasoning/explanation) is high. In this research, we introduce a new representation learning framework (i.e., partial concept bottleneck), which considers the provision of counterfactual explanations as an embedded property of the risk model. Despite architectural changes necessary for jointly optimising for prediction accuracy and counterfactual reasoning, the accuracy of our approach is comparable to prediction-only models. Our results suggest that our proposed framework has the potential to help researchers and clinicians improve personalised care (e.g., by investigating the hypothetical differential effects of interventions)

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Risk factor identification for incident heart failure using neural network distillation and variable selection

Recent evidence shows that deep learning models trained on electronic health records from millions of patients can deliver substantially more accurate predictions of risk compared to their statistical counterparts. While this provides an important opportunity for improving clinical decision-making, the lack of interpretability is a major barrier to the incorporation of these black-box models in routine care, limiting their trustworthiness and preventing further hypothesis-testing investigations. In this study, we propose two methods, namely, model distillation and variable selection, to untangle hidden patterns learned by an established deep learning model (BEHRT) for risk association identification. Due to the clinical importance and diversity of heart failure as a phenotype, it was used to showcase the merits of the proposed methods. A cohort with 788,880 (8.3% incident heart failure) patients was considered for the study. Model distillation identified 598 and 379 diseases that were associated and dissociated with heart failure at the population level, respectively. While the associations were broadly consistent with prior knowledge, our method also highlighted several less appreciated links that are worth further investigation. In addition to these important population-level insights, we developed an approach to individual-level interpretation to take account of varying manifestation of heart failure in clinical practice. This was achieved through variable selection by detecting a minimal set of encounters that can maximally preserve the accuracy of prediction for individuals. Our proposed work provides a discovery-enabling tool to identify risk factors in both population and individual levels from a data-driven perspective. This helps to generate new hypotheses and guides further investigations on causal links.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access