BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Mohammad A. Hoque

Mohammad A. Hoque appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster ComputingNetworking and Internet ArchitectureOther Computer SciencePerformanceSystems and Control

Catalog footprint

What is connected

5works
5topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

5 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Blockchain Consensus Algorithms: A Survey

In recent years, blockchain technology has received unparalleled attention from academia, industry, and governments all around the world. It is considered a technological breakthrough anticipated to disrupt several application domains. This has resulted in a plethora of blockchain systems for various purposes. However, many of these blockchain systems suffer from serious shortcomings related to their performance and security, which need to be addressed before any wide-scale adoption can be achieved. A crucial component of any blockchain system is its underlying consensus algorithm, which in many ways, determines its performance and security. Therefore, to address the limitations of different blockchain systems, several existing as well novel consensus algorithms have been introduced. A systematic analysis of these algorithms will help to understand how and why any particular blockchain performs the way it functions. However, the existing studies of consensus algorithms are not comprehensive. Those studies have incomplete discussions on the properties of the algorithms and fail to analyse several major blockchain consensus algorithms in terms of their scopes. This article fills this gap by analysing a wide range of consensus algorithms using a comprehensive taxonomy of properties and by examining the implications of different issues still prevalent in consensus algorithms in detail. The result of the analysis is presented in tabular formats, which provides a visual illustration of these algorithms in a meaningful way. We have also analysed more than hundred top crypto-currencies belonging to different categories of consensus algorithms to understand their properties and to implicate different trends in these crypto-currencies. Finally, we have presented a decision tree of algorithms to be used as a tool to test the suitability of consensus algorithms under different criteria.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

In Situ Network and Application Performance Measurement on Android Devices and the Imperfections

Understanding network and application performance are essential for debugging, improving user experience, and performance comparison. Meanwhile, modern mobile systems are optimized for energy-efficient computation and communications that may limit the performance of network and applications. In recent years, several tools have emerged that analyze network performance of mobile applications in~situ with the help of the VPN service. There is a limited understanding of how these measurement tools and system optimizations affect the network and application performance. In this study, we first demonstrate that mobile systems employ energy-aware system hardware tuning, which affects application performance and network throughput. We next show that the VPN-based application performance measurement tools, such as Lumen, PrivacyGuard, and Video Optimizer, aid in ambiguous network performance measurements and degrade the application performance. Our findings suggest that sound application and network performance measurement on Android devices requires a good understanding of the device, networks, measurement tools, and applications.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

A survey of systems for massive stream analytics

The immense growth of data demands switching from traditional data processing solutions to systems, which can process a continuous stream of real time data. Various applications employ stream processing systems to provide solutions to emerging Big Data problems. Open-source solutions such as Storm, Spark Streaming, and S4 are the attempts to answer key stream processing questions. The recent introduction of real time stream processing commercial solutions such as Amazon Kinesis, IBM Infosphere Stream reflect industry requirements. The system and application related challenges to handle massive stream of real time data analytics are an active field of research. In this paper, we present a comparative analysis of the existing state-of-the-art stream processing solutions. We also include various application domains, which are transforming their business model to benefit from these large scale stream processing systems.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Accurate Online Full Charge Capacity Modeling of Smartphone Batteries

Full charge capacity (FCC) refers to the amount of energy a battery can hold. It is the fundamental property of smartphone batteries that diminishes as the battery ages and is charged/discharged. We investigate the behavior of smartphone batteries while charging and demonstrate that the battery voltage and charging rate information can together characterize the FCC of a battery. We propose a new method for accurately estimating FCC without exposing low-level system details or introducing new hardware or system modules. We also propose and implement a collaborative FCC estimation technique that builds on crowdsourced battery data. The method finds the reference voltage curve and charging rate of a particular smartphone model from the data and then compares the curve and rate of an individual user with the model reference curve. After analyzing a large data set, we report that 55% of all devices and at least one device in 330 out of 357 unique device models lost some of their FCC. For some models, the median capacity loss exceeded 20% with the inter-quartile range being over 20 pp. The models enable debugging the performance of smartphone batteries, more accurate power modeling, and energy-aware system or application optimization.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Characterizing Smartphone Power Management in the Wild

For better reliability and prolonged battery life, it is important that users and vendors understand the quality of charging and the performance of smartphone batteries. Considering the diverse set of devices and user behavior it is a challenge. In this work, we analyze a large collection of battery analytics dataset collected from 30K devices of 1.5K unique smartphone models. We analyze their battery properties and state of charge while charging, and reveal the characteristics of different components of their power management systems: charging mechanisms, state of charge estimation techniques, and their battery properties. We explore diverse charging behavior of devices and their users.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access