BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Mirka Miller

Mirka Miller contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
math.COData Structures and AlgorithmsDiscrete Mathematics

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2013arXiv

A Heuristic for Magic and Antimagic Graph Labellings

Graph labellings have been a very fruitful area of research in the last four decades. However, despite the staggering number of papers published in the field (over 1000), few general results are available, and most papers deal with particular classes of graphs and methods. Here we approach the problem from the computational viewpoint, and in a quite general way. We present the existence problem of a particular labelling as a combinatorial optimization problem, then we discuss the possible strategies to solve it, and finally we present a heuristic for finding different classes of labellings, like vertex-, edge-, or face-magic, and $(a, d)$-antimagic $(v, e, f)$-labellings. The algorithm has been implemented in C++ and MATLAB, and with its aid we have been able to derive new results for some classes of graphs, in particular, vertex-antimagic edge labellings for small graphs of the type $P_2^r \times P_3^s$, for which no general construction is known so far.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

On large bipartite graphs of diameter 3

We consider the bipartite version of the {\it degree/diameter problem}, namely, given natural numbers $d\ge2$ and $D\ge2$, find the maximum number $\N^b(d,D)$ of vertices in a bipartite graph of maximum degree $d$ and diameter $D$. In this context, the bipartite Moore bound $\M^b(d,D)$ represents a general upper bound for $\N^b(d,D)$. Bipartite graphs of order $\M^b(d,D)$ are very rare, and determining $\N^b(d,D)$ still remains an open problem for most $(d,D)$ pairs. This paper is a follow-up to our earlier paper \cite{FPV12}, where a study on bipartite $(d,D,-4)$-graphs (that is, bipartite graphs of order $\M^b(d,D)-4$) was carried out. Here we first present some structural properties of bipartite $(d,3,-4)$-graphs, and later prove there are no bipartite $(7,3,-4)$-graphs. This result implies that the known bipartite $(7,3,-6)$-graph is optimal, and therefore $\N^b(7,3)=80$. Our approach also bears a proof of the uniqueness of the known bipartite $(5,3,-4)$-graph, and the non-existence of bipartite $(6,3,-4)$-graphs. In addition, we discover three new largest known bipartite (and also vertex-transitive) graphs of degree 11, diameter 3 and order 190, result which improves by 4 vertices the previous lower bound for $\N^b(11,3)$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

The Maximum Degree-and-Diameter-Bounded Subgraph in the Mesh

The problem of finding the largest connected subgraph of a given undirected host graph, subject to constraints on the maximum degree $Δ$ and the diameter $D$, was introduced in \cite{maxddbs}, as a generalization of the Degree-Diameter Problem. A case of special interest is when the host graph is a common parallel architecture. Here we discuss the case when the host graph is a $k$-dimensional mesh. We provide some general bounds for the order of the largest subgraph in arbitrary dimension $k$, and for the particular cases of $k=3, Δ= 4$ and $k=2, Δ= 3$, we give constructions that result in sharper lower bounds.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

On graphs of defect at most 2

In this paper we consider the degree/diameter problem, namely, given natural numbers Δ \geq 2 and D \geq 1, find the maximum number N(Δ,D) of vertices in a graph of maximum degree Δ and diameter D. In this context, the Moore bound M(Δ,D) represents an upper bound for N(Δ,D). Graphs of maximum degree Δ, diameter D and order M(Δ,D), called Moore graphs, turned out to be very rare. Therefore, it is very interesting to investigate graphs of maximum degree Δ \geq 2, diameter D \geq 1 and order M(Δ,D) - ε with small ε > 0, that is, (Δ,D,-ε)-graphs. The parameter ε is called the defect. Graphs of defect 1 exist only for Δ = 2. When ε > 1, (Δ,D,-ε)-graphs represent a wide unexplored area. This paper focuses on graphs of defect 2. Building on the approaches developed in [11] we obtain several new important results on this family of graphs. First, we prove that the girth of a (Δ,D,-2)-graph with Δ \geq 4 and D \geq 4 is 2D. Second, and most important, we prove the non-existence of (Δ,D,-2)-graphs with even Δ \geq 4 and D \geq 4; this outcome, together with a proof on the non-existence of (4, 3,-2)-graphs (also provided in the paper), allows us to complete the catalogue of (4,D,-ε)-graphs with D \geq 2 and 0 \leq ε \leq 2. Such a catalogue is only the second census of (Δ,D,-2)-graphs known at present, the first being the one of (3,D,-ε)-graphs with D \geq 2 and 0 \leq ε \leq 2 [14]. Other results of this paper include necessary conditions for the existence of (Δ,D,-2)-graphs with odd Δ \geq 5 and D \geq 4, and the non-existence of (Δ,D,-2)-graphs with odd Δ \geq 5 and D \geq 5 such that Δ \equiv 0, 2 (mod D).

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access