BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for researchDiscover
Workspaces
Network
Opportunities
Account
Researcher profile
Guillermo Pineda-Villavicencio contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.
Trust snapshot
Actions
Identity and collaboration
Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.
Log in to claimDirect collaboration
Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.
Research graph
Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.
BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.
Published work
It is folklore that the cycle space of graphs of polytopes is generated by the cycles bounding the 2-faces. We provide a proof of this result that bypass homological arguments, which seem to be the most widely known proof. As a corollary, we obtain a result of Blind & Blind (1994) stating that graphs of polytopes are bipartite if and only if graphs of every 2-face are bipartite.
We specify what is meant for a polytope to be reconstructible from its graph or dual graph. And we introduce the problem of class reconstructibility, i.e., the face lattice of the polytope can be determined from the (dual) graph within a given class. We provide examples of cubical polytopes that are not reconstructible from their dual graphs. Furthermore, we show that matroid (base) polytopes are not reconstructible from their graphs and not class reconstructible from their dual graphs; our counterexamples include hypersimplices. Additionally, we prove that matroid polytopes are class reconstructible from their graphs, and we present a $O(n^3)$ algorithm that computes the vertices of a matroid polytope from its $n$-vertex graph. Moreover, our proof includes a characterisation of all matroids with isomorphic basis exchange graphs.
We define an analogue of the cube and an analogue of the 5-wedge in higher dimensions, each with $2d+2$ vertices and $d^2+2d-3$ edges. We show that these two are the only minimisers of the number of edges, amongst d-polytopes with $2d+2$ vertices, for all $d$ except 4, 5 and 7. We also show that there are four sporadic minimisers in these low dimensions. We announce a partial solution to the corresponding problem for polytopes with $2d + 3$ vertices.
In 1855 H. J. S. Smith proved Fermat's two-square using the notion of palindromic continuants. In his paper, Smith constructed a proper representation of a prime number $p$ as a sum of two squares, given a solution of $z^2+1\equiv0\pmod{p}$, and vice versa. In this paper, we extend the use of continuants to proper representations by sums of two squares in rings of polynomials on fields of characteristic different from 2. New deterministic algorithms for finding the corresponding proper representations are presented. Our approach will provide a new constructive proof of the four-square theorem and new proofs for other representations of integers by quaternary quadratic forms.
We consider the degree/diameter problem for graphs embedded in a surface, namely, given a surface $Σ$ and integers $Δ$ and $k$, determine the maximum order $N(Δ,k,Σ)$ of a graph embeddable in $Σ$ with maximum degree $Δ$ and diameter $k$. We introduce a number of constructions which produce many new largest known planar and toroidal graphs. We record all these graphs in the available tables of largest known graphs. Given a surface $Σ$ of Euler genus $g$ and an odd diameter $k$, the current best asymptotic lower bound for $N(Δ,k,Σ)$ is given by \[\sqrt{\frac{3}{8}g}Δ^{\lfloor k/2\rfloor}.\] Our constructions produce new graphs of order \[\begin{cases}6Δ^{\lfloor k/2\rfloor}& \text{if $Σ$ is the Klein bottle}\\ \(\frac{7}{2}+\sqrt{6g+\frac{1}{4}}\)Δ^{\lfloor k/2\rfloor}& \text{otherwise,}\end{cases}\] thus improving the former value by a factor of 4.
Given a tesselation of the plane, defined by a planar straight-line graph $G$, we want to find a minimal set $S$ of points in the plane, such that the Voronoi diagram associated with $S$ "fits" \ $G$. This is the Generalized Inverse Voronoi Problem (GIVP), defined in \cite{Trin07} and rediscovered recently in \cite{Baner12}. Here we give an algorithm that solves this problem with a number of points that is linear in the size of $G$, assuming that the smallest angle in $G$ is constant.
We consider the bipartite version of the {\it degree/diameter problem}, namely, given natural numbers $d\ge2$ and $D\ge2$, find the maximum number $\N^b(d,D)$ of vertices in a bipartite graph of maximum degree $d$ and diameter $D$. In this context, the bipartite Moore bound $\M^b(d,D)$ represents a general upper bound for $\N^b(d,D)$. Bipartite graphs of order $\M^b(d,D)$ are very rare, and determining $\N^b(d,D)$ still remains an open problem for most $(d,D)$ pairs. This paper is a follow-up to our earlier paper \cite{FPV12}, where a study on bipartite $(d,D,-4)$-graphs (that is, bipartite graphs of order $\M^b(d,D)-4$) was carried out. Here we first present some structural properties of bipartite $(d,3,-4)$-graphs, and later prove there are no bipartite $(7,3,-4)$-graphs. This result implies that the known bipartite $(7,3,-6)$-graph is optimal, and therefore $\N^b(7,3)=80$. Our approach also bears a proof of the uniqueness of the known bipartite $(5,3,-4)$-graph, and the non-existence of bipartite $(6,3,-4)$-graphs. In addition, we discover three new largest known bipartite (and also vertex-transitive) graphs of degree 11, diameter 3 and order 190, result which improves by 4 vertices the previous lower bound for $\N^b(11,3)$.
We consider the bipartite version of the degree/diameter problem, namely, given natural numbers Δ \geq 2 and D \geq 2, find the maximum number Nb(Δ,D) of vertices in a bipartite graph of maximum degree Δ and diameter D. In this context, the Moore bipartite bound Mb(Δ,D) represents an upper bound for Nb(Δ,D). Bipartite graphs of maximum degree Δ, diameter D and order Mb(Δ,D), called Moore bipartite graphs, have turned out to be very rare. Therefore, it is very interesting to investigate bipartite graphs of maximum degree Δ \geq 2, diameter D \geq 2 and order Mb(Δ,D) - εwith small ε> 0, that is, bipartite (Δ,D,-ε)-graphs. The parameter εis called the defect. This paper considers bipartite graphs of defect at most 4, and presents all the known such graphs. Bipartite graphs of defect 2 have been studied in the past; if Δ \geq 3 and D \geq 3, they may only exist for D = 3. However, when ε> 2 bipartite (Δ,D,-ε)-graphs represent a wide unexplored area. The main results of the paper include several necessary conditions for the existence of bipartite $(Δ,d,-4)$-graphs; the complete catalogue of bipartite (3,D,-ε)-graphs with D \geq 2 and 0 \leq ε\leq 4; the complete catalogue of bipartite (Δ,D,-ε)-graphs with Δ \geq 2, 5 \leq D \leq 187 (D /= 6) and 0 \leq ε\leq 4; and a non-existence proof of all bipartite (Δ,D,-4)-graphs with Δ \geq 3 and odd D \geq 7. Finally, we conjecture that there are no bipartite graphs of defect 4 for Δ \geq 3 and D \geq 5, and comment on some implications of our results for upper bounds of Nb(Δ,D).
In this paper we consider the degree/diameter problem, namely, given natural numbers Δ \geq 2 and D \geq 1, find the maximum number N(Δ,D) of vertices in a graph of maximum degree Δ and diameter D. In this context, the Moore bound M(Δ,D) represents an upper bound for N(Δ,D). Graphs of maximum degree Δ, diameter D and order M(Δ,D), called Moore graphs, turned out to be very rare. Therefore, it is very interesting to investigate graphs of maximum degree Δ \geq 2, diameter D \geq 1 and order M(Δ,D) - ε with small ε > 0, that is, (Δ,D,-ε)-graphs. The parameter ε is called the defect. Graphs of defect 1 exist only for Δ = 2. When ε > 1, (Δ,D,-ε)-graphs represent a wide unexplored area. This paper focuses on graphs of defect 2. Building on the approaches developed in [11] we obtain several new important results on this family of graphs. First, we prove that the girth of a (Δ,D,-2)-graph with Δ \geq 4 and D \geq 4 is 2D. Second, and most important, we prove the non-existence of (Δ,D,-2)-graphs with even Δ \geq 4 and D \geq 4; this outcome, together with a proof on the non-existence of (4, 3,-2)-graphs (also provided in the paper), allows us to complete the catalogue of (4,D,-ε)-graphs with D \geq 2 and 0 \leq ε \leq 2. Such a catalogue is only the second census of (Δ,D,-2)-graphs known at present, the first being the one of (3,D,-ε)-graphs with D \geq 2 and 0 \leq ε \leq 2 [14]. Other results of this paper include necessary conditions for the existence of (Δ,D,-2)-graphs with odd Δ \geq 5 and D \geq 4, and the non-existence of (Δ,D,-2)-graphs with odd Δ \geq 5 and D \geq 5 such that Δ \equiv 0, 2 (mod D).
The Moore bound constitutes both an upper bound on the order of a graph of maximum degree $d$ and diameter $D=k$ and a lower bound on the order of a graph of minimum degree $d$ and odd girth $g=2k+1$. Graphs missing or exceeding the Moore bound by $ε$ are called {\it graphs with defect or excess $ε$}, respectively. While {\it Moore graphs} (graphs with $ε=0$) and graphs with defect or excess 1 have been characterized almost completely, graphs with defect or excess 2 represent a wide unexplored area. Graphs with defect (excess) 2 satisfy the equation $G_{d,k}(A) = J_n + B$ ($G_{d,k}(A) = J_n-B$), where $A$ denotes the adjacency matrix of the graph in question, $n$ its order, $J_n$ the $n\times n$ matrix whose entries are all 1's, $B$ the adjacency matrix of a union of vertex-disjoint cycles, and $G_{d,k}(x)$ a polynomial with integer coefficients such that the matrix $G_{d,k}(A)$ gives the number of paths of length at most $k$ joining each pair of vertices in the graph. In particular, if $B$ is the adjacency matrix of a cycle of order $n$ we call the corresponding graphs \emph{graphs with cyclic defect or excess}; these graphs are the subject of our attention in this paper. We prove the non-existence of infinitely many such graphs. As the highlight of the paper we provide the asymptotic upper bound of $O(\frac{64}3d^{3/2})$ for the number of graphs of odd degree $d\ge3$ and cyclic defect or excess. This bound is in fact quite generous, and as a way of illustration, we show the non-existence of some families of graphs of odd degree $d\ge3$ and cyclic defect or excess. Actually, we conjecture that, apart from the Möbius ladder on 8 vertices, no non-trivial graph of any degree $\ge 3$ and cyclic defect or excess exists.