BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Mingfei Zhao

Mingfei Zhao contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Computer Science and Game TheoryData Structures and AlgorithmsDiscrete Mathematics

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 19 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
5works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

5 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Computing Simple Mechanisms: Lift-and-Round over Marginal Reduced Forms

We study revenue maximization in multi-item multi-bidder auctions under the natural item-independence assumption - a classical problem in Multi-Dimensional Bayesian Mechanism Design. One of the biggest challenges in this area is developing algorithms to compute (approximately) optimal mechanisms that are not brute-force in the size of the bidder type space, which is usually exponential in the number of items in multi-item auctions. Unfortunately, such algorithms were only known for basic settings of our problem when bidders have unit-demand [CHMS10,CMS15] or additive valuations [Yao15]. In this paper, we significantly improve the previous results and design the first algorithm that runs in time polynomial in the number of items and the number of bidders to compute mechanisms that are $O(1)$-approximations to the optimal revenue when bidders have XOS valuations, resolving an open problem raised in [CM16,CZ17]. Moreover, the computed mechanism has a simple structure: It is either a posted price mechanism or a two-part tariff mechanism. As a corollary of our result, we show how to compute an approximately optimal and simple mechanism efficiently using only sample access to the bidders' value distributions. Our algorithm builds on two innovations that allow us to search over the space of mechanisms efficiently: (i) a new type of succinct representation of mechanisms - the marginal reduced forms, and (ii) a novel Lift-and-Round procedure that concavifies the problem.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Is Selling Complete Information (Approximately) Optimal?

We study the problem of selling information to a data-buyer who faces a decision problem under uncertainty. We consider the classic Bayesian decision-theoretic model pioneered by [Blackwell, 1951, 1953]. Initially, the data buyer has only partial information about the payoff-relevant state of the world. A data seller offers additional information about the state of the world. The information is revealed through signaling schemes, also referred to as experiments. In the single-agent setting, any mechanism can be represented as a menu of experiments. [Bergemann et al., 2018] present a complete characterization of the revenue-optimal mechanism in a binary state and binary action environment. By contrast, no characterization is known for the case with more actions. In this paper, we consider more general environments and study arguably the simplest mechanism, which only sells the fully informative experiment. In the environment with binary state and $m\geq 3$ actions, we provide an $O(m)$-approximation to the optimal revenue by selling only the fully informative experiment and show that the approximation ratio is tight up to an absolute constant factor. An important corollary of our lower bound is that the size of the optimal menu must grow at least linearly in the number of available actions, so no universal upper bound exists for the size of the optimal menu in the general single-dimensional setting. For multi-dimensional environments, we prove that even in arguably the simplest matching utility environment with 3 states and 3 actions, the ratio between the optimal revenue and the revenue by selling only the fully informative experiment can grow immediately to a polynomial of the number of agent types. Nonetheless, if the distribution is uniform, we show that selling only the fully informative experiment is indeed the optimal mechanism.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

On Multi-Dimensional Gains from Trade Maximization

We study gains from trade in multi-dimensional two-sided markets. Specifically, we focus on a setting with $n$ heterogeneous items, where each item is owned by a different seller $i$, and there is a constrained-additive buyer with feasibility constraint $\mathcal{F}$. Multi-dimensional settings in one-sided markets, e.g. where a seller owns multiple heterogeneous items but also is the mechanism designer, are well-understood. In addition, single-dimensional settings in two-sided markets, e.g. where a buyer and seller each seek or own a single item, are also well-understood. Multi-dimensional two-sided markets, however, encapsulate the major challenges of both lines of work: optimizing the sale of heterogeneous items, ensuring incentive-compatibility among both sides of the market, and enforcing budget balance. We present, to the best of our knowledge, the first worst-case approximation guarantee for gains from trade in a multi-dimensional two-sided market. Our first result provides an $O(\log (1/r))$-approximation to the first-best gains from trade for a broad class of downward-closed feasibility constraints (such as matroid, matching, knapsack, or the intersection of these). Here $r$ is the minimum probability over all items that a buyer's value for the item exceeds the seller's cost. Our second result removes the dependence on $r$ and provides an unconditional $O(\log n)$-approximation to the second-best gains from trade. We extend both results for a general constrained-additive buyer, losing another $O(\log n)$-factor en-route.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Worst-Case Welfare of Item Pricing in the Tollbooth Problem

We study the worst-case welfare of item pricing in the \emph{tollbooth problem}. The problem was first introduced by Guruswami et al, and is a special case of the combinatorial auction in which (i) each of the $m$ items in the auction is an edge of some underlying graph; and (ii) each of the $n$ buyers is single-minded and only interested in buying all edges of a single path. We consider the competitive ratio between the hindsight optimal welfare and the optimal worst-case welfare among all item-pricing mechanisms, when the order of the arriving buyers is adversarial. We assume that buyers own the \emph{tie-breaking} power, i.e. they can choose whether or not to buy the demand path at 0 utility. We prove a tight competitive ratio of $3/2$ when the underlying graph is a single path (also known as the \emph{highway} problem), whereas item-pricing can achieve the hindsight optimal if the seller is allowed to choose a proper tie-breaking rule to maximize the welfare. Moreover, we prove an $O(1)$ upper bound of competitive ratio when the underlying graph is a tree. For general graphs, we prove an $Ω(m^{1/8})$ lower bound of the competitive ratio. We show that an $m^{Ω(1)}$ competitive ratio is unavoidable even if the graph is a grid, or if the capacity of every edge is augmented by a constant factor $c$. The results hold even if the seller has tie-breaking power.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Simple Mechanisms for Profit Maximization in Multi-item Auctions

We study a classical Bayesian mechanism design problem where a seller is selling multiple items to multiple buyers. We consider the case where the seller has costs to produce the items, and these costs are private information to the seller. How can the seller design a mechanism to maximize her profit? Two well-studied problems, revenue maximization in multi-item auctions and signaling in ad auctions, are special cases of our problem. We show that there exists a simple mechanism whose profit is at least $\frac{1}{44}$ of the optimal profit for multiple buyers with matroid-rank valuation functions. When there is a single buyer, the approximation factor is $11$ for general constraint-additive valuations and $6$ for additive valuations. Our result holds even when the seller's costs are correlated across items. We introduce a new class of mechanisms called permit-selling mechanisms. For single buyer case these mechanisms are quite simple: there are two stages. For each item $j$, we create a separate permit that allows the buyer to purchase the item in the second stage. In the first stage, we sell the permits without revealing any information about the costs. In the second stage, the seller reveals all the costs, and the buyer can buy item $j$ by paying the item price if the buyer has purchased the permit for item $j$ in the first stage. We show that either selling the permits separately or as a grand bundle suffices to achieve the constant factor approximation to the optimal profit (6 for additive, and 11 for constrained additive). For multiple buyers, we sell the permits sequentially and obtain the constant factor approximation. Our proof is enabled by constructing a benchmark for the optimal profit by combining a novel dual solution with the existing ex-ante relaxation technique.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access