BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Mingchao Yu

Mingchao Yu appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
Information Theorymath.ITCryptography and SecurityDistributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing

Catalog footprint

What is connected

8works
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

8 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

PolyShard: Coded Sharding Achieves Linearly Scaling Efficiency and Security Simultaneously

Today's blockchain designs suffer from a trilemma claiming that no blockchain system can simultaneously achieve decentralization, security, and performance scalability. For current blockchain systems, as more nodes join the network, the efficiency of the system (computation, communication, and storage) stays constant at best. A leading idea for enabling blockchains to scale efficiency is the notion of sharding: different subsets of nodes handle different portions of the blockchain, thereby reducing the load for each individual node. However, existing sharding proposals achieve efficiency scaling by compromising on trust - corrupting the nodes in a given shard will lead to the permanent loss of the corresponding portion of data. In this paper, we settle the trilemma by demonstrating a new protocol for coded storage and computation in blockchains. In particular, we propose PolyShard: ``polynomially coded sharding'' scheme that achieves information-theoretic upper bounds on the efficiency of the storage, system throughput, as well as on trust, thus enabling a truly scalable system. We provide simulation results that numerically demonstrate the performance improvement over state of the arts, and the scalability of the PolyShard system. Finally, we discuss potential enhancements, and highlight practical considerations in building such a system.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

On Deterministic Linear Network Coded Broadcast and Its Relation to Matroid Theory

Deterministic linear network coding (DLNC) is an important family of network coding techniques for wireless packet broadcast. In this paper, we show that DLNC is strongly related to and can be effectively studied using matroid theory without bridging index coding. We prove the equivalence between the DLNC solution and matrix matroid. We use this equivalence to study the performance limits of DLNC in terms of the number of transmissions and its dependence on the finite field size. Specifically, we derive the sufficient and necessary condition for the existence of perfect DLNC solutions and prove that such solutions may not exist over certain finite fields. We then show that identifying perfect solutions over any finite field is still an open problem in general. To fill this gap, we develop a heuristic algorithm which employs graphic matroids to find perfect DLNC solutions over any finite field. Numerical results show that its performance in terms of minimum number of transmissions is close to the lower bound, and is better than random linear network coding when the field size is not so large.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

On Minimizing the Average Packet Decoding Delay in Wireless Network Coded Broadcast

We consider a setting in which a sender wishes to broadcast a block of K data packets to a set of wireless receivers, where each of the receivers has a subset of the data packets already available to it (e.g., from prior transmissions) and wants the rest of the packets. Our goal is to find a linear network coding scheme that yields the minimum average packet decoding delay (APDD), i.e., the average time it takes for a receiver to decode a data packet. Our contributions can be summarized as follows. First, we prove that this problem is NP-hard by presenting a reduction from the hypergraph coloring problem. Next, we show that %\alexn{an MDS-based solution or} a random linear network coding (RLNC) provides an approximate solution to this problem with approximation ratio $2$ with high probability. Next, we present a methodology for designing specialized approximation algorithms for this problem that outperform RLNC solutions while maintaining the same throughput. In a special case of practical interest with a small number of wanted packets our solution can achieve an approximation ratio (4-2/K)/3. Finally, we conduct an experimental study that demonstrates the advantages of the presented methodology.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Performance Characterization and Transmission Schemes for Instantly Decodable Network Coding in Wireless Broadcast

We consider broadcasting a block of packets to multiple wireless receivers under random packet erasures using instantly decodable network coding (IDNC). The sender first broadcasts each packet uncoded once, then generates coded packets according to receivers' feedback about their missing packets. We focus on strict IDNC (S-IDNC), where each coded packet includes at most one missing packet of every receiver. But we will also compare it with general IDNC (G-IDNC), where this condition is relaxed. We characterize two fundamental performance limits of S-IDNC: 1) the number of transmissions to complete the broadcast, and 2) the average delay for a receiver to decode a packet. We derive a closed-form expression for the expected minimum number of transmissions in terms of the number of packets and receivers and the erasure probability. We prove that it is NP-hard to minimize the decoding delay of S-IDNC. We also derive achievable upper bounds on the above two performance limits. We show that G-IDNC can outperform S-IDNC %in terms of the number of transmissions without packet erasures, but not necessarily with packet erasures. Next, we design optimal and heuristic S-IDNC transmission schemes and coding algorithms with full/intermittent receiver feedback. We present simulation results to corroborate the developed theory and compare with existing schemes.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

The Benefit of Limited Feedback to Generation-Based Random Linear Network Coding in Wireless Broadcast

Random linear network coding (RLNC) is asymptotically throughput optimal in the wireless broadcast of a block of packets from a sender to a set of receivers, but suffers from heavy computational load and packet decoding delay. To mitigate this problem while maintaining good throughput, we partition the packet block into disjoint generations after broadcasting the packets uncoded once and collecting one round of feedback about receivers' packet reception state. We prove the NP-hardness of the optimal partitioning problem by using a hypergraph coloring approach, and develop an efficient heuristic algorithm for its solution. Simulations show that our algorithm outperforms existing solutions.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

From Instantly Decodable to Random Linear Network Coding

Our primary goal in this paper is to traverse the performance gap between two linear network coding schemes: random linear network coding (RLNC) and instantly decodable network coding (IDNC) in terms of throughput and decoding delay. We first redefine the concept of packet generation and use it to partition a block of partially-received data packets in a novel way, based on the coding sets in an IDNC solution. By varying the generation size, we obtain a general coding framework which consists of a series of coding schemes, with RLNC and IDNC identified as two extreme cases. We then prove that the throughput and decoding delay performance of all coding schemes in this coding framework are bounded between the performance of RLNC and IDNC and hence throughput-delay tradeoff becomes possible. We also propose implementations of this coding framework to further improve its throughput and decoding delay performance, to manage feedback frequency and coding complexity, or to achieve in-block performance adaption. Extensive simulations are then provided to verify the performance of the proposed coding schemes and their implementations.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

On Throughput and Decoding Delay Performance of Instantly Decodable Network Coding

In this paper, a comprehensive study of packet-based instantly decodable network coding (IDNC) for single-hop wireless broadcast is presented. The optimal IDNC solution in terms of throughput is proposed and its packet decoding delay performance is investigated. Lower and upper bounds on the achievable throughput and decoding delay performance of IDNC are derived and assessed through extensive simulations. Furthermore, the impact of receivers' feedback frequency on the performance of IDNC is studied and optimal IDNC solutions are proposed for scenarios where receivers' feedback is only available after and IDNC round, composed of several coded transmissions. However, since finding these IDNC optimal solutions is computational complex, we further propose simple yet efficient heuristic IDNC algorithms. The impact of system settings and parameters such as channel erasure probability, feedback frequency, and the number of receivers is also investigated and simple guidelines for practical implementations of IDNC are proposed.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Instantly Decodable versus Random Linear Network Coding: A Comparative Framework for Throughput and Decoding Delay Performance

This paper studies the tension between throughput and decoding delay performance of two widely-used network coding schemes: random linear network coding (RLNC) and instantly decodable network coding (IDNC). A single-hop broadcasting system model is considered that aims to deliver a block of packets to all receivers in the presence of packet erasures. For a fair and analytically tractable comparison between the two coding schemes, the transmission comprises two phases: a systematic transmission phase and a network coded transmission phase which is further divided into rounds. After the systematic transmission phase and given the same packet reception state, three quantitative metrics are proposed and derived in each scheme: 1) the absolute minimum number of transmissions in the first coded transmission round (assuming no erasures), 2) probability distribution of extra coded transmissions in a subsequent round (due to erasures), and 3) average packet decoding delay. This comparative study enables application-aware adaptive selection between IDNC and RLNC after systematic transmission phase. One contribution of this paper is to provide a deep and systematic understanding of the IDNC scheme, to propose the notion of packet diversity and an optimal IDNC encoding scheme for minimizing metric 1. This is generally NP-hard, but nevertheless required for characterizing and deriving all the three metrics. Analytical and numerical results show that there is no clear winner between RLNC and IDNC if one is concerned with both throughput and decoding delay performance. IDNC is more preferable than RLNC when the number of receivers is smaller than packet block size, and the case reverses when the number of receivers is much greater than the packet block size. In the middle regime, the choice can depend on the application and a specific instance of the problem.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access