BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Milan Studeny

Milan Studeny contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Artificial Intelligencemath.COInformation Theorymath.IT

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
6works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

6 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Conditional independence structures over four discrete random variables revisited: conditional Ingleton inequalities

The paper deals with conditional linear information inequalities valid for entropy functions induced by discrete random variables. Specifically, the so-called conditional Ingleton inequalities are in the center of interest: these are valid under conditional independence assumptions on the inducing random variables. We discuss five inequalities of this particular type, four of which has appeared earlier in the literature. Besides the proof of the new fifth inequality, simpler proofs of (some of) former inequalities are presented. These five information inequalities are used to characterize all conditional independence structures induced by four discrete random variables.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Polyhedral aspects of score equivalence in Bayesian network structure learning

This paper deals with faces and facets of the family-variable polytope and the characteristic-imset polytope, which are special polytopes used in integer linear programming approaches to statistically learn Bayesian network structure. A common form of linear objectives to be maximized in this area leads to the concept of score equivalence (SE), both for linear objectives and for faces of the family-variable polytope. We characterize the linear space of SE objectives and establish a one-to-one correspondence between SE faces of the family-variable polytope, the faces of the characteristic-imset polytope, and standardized supermodular functions. The characterization of SE facets in terms of extremality of the corresponding supermodular function gives an elegant method to verify whether an inequality is SE-facet-defining for the family-variable polytope. We also show that when maximizing an SE objective one can eliminate linear constraints of the family-variable polytope that correspond to non-SE facets. However, we show that solely considering SE facets is not enough as a counter-example shows; one has to consider the linear inequality constraints that correspond to facets of the characteristic-imset polytope despite the fact that they may not define facets in the family-variable mode.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Bayesian Networks from the Point of View of Chain Graphs

AThe paper gives a few arguments in favour of the use of chain graphs for description of probabilistic conditional independence structures. Every Bayesian network model can be equivalently introduced by means of a factorization formula with respect to a chain graph which is Markov equivalent to the Bayesian network. A graphical characterization of such graphs is given. The class of equivalent graphs can be represented by a distinguished graph which is called the largest chain graph. The factorization formula with respect to the largest chain graph is a basis of a proposal of how to represent the corresponding (discrete) probability distribution in a computer (i.e. parametrize it). This way does not depend on the choice of a particular Bayesian network from the class of equivalent networks and seems to be the most efficient way from the point of view of memory demands. A separation criterion for reading independency statements from a chain graph is formulated in a simpler way. It resembles the well-known d-separation criterion for Bayesian networks and can be implemented locally.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

On characterizing Inclusion of Bayesian Networks

Every directed acyclic graph (DAG) over a finite non-empty set of variables (= nodes) N induces an independence model over N, which is a list of conditional independence statements over N.The inclusion problem is how to characterize (in graphical terms) whether all independence statements in the model induced by a DAG K are in the model induced by a second DAG L. Meek (1997) conjectured that this inclusion holds iff there exists a sequence of DAGs from L to K such that only certain 'legal' arrow reversal and 'legal' arrow adding operations are performed to get the next DAG in the sequence.In this paper we give several characterizations of inclusion of DAG models and verify Meek's conjecture in the case that the DAGs K and L differ in at most one adjacency. As a warming up a rigorous proof of well-known graphical characterizations of equivalence of DAGs, which is a highly related problem, is given.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

On Separation Criterion and Recovery Algorithm for Chain Graphs

Chain graphs give a natural unifying point of view on Markov and Bayesian networks and enlarge the potential of graphical models for description of conditional independence structures. In the paper a direct graphical separation criterion for chain graphs, called c-separation, which generalizes the d-separation criterion for Bayesian networks is introduced (recalled). It is equivalent to the classic moralization criterion for chain graphs and complete in sense that for every chain graph there exists a probability distribution satisfying exactly conditional independencies derivable from the chain graph by the c-separation criterion. Every class of Markov equivalent chain graphs can be uniquely described by a natural representative, called the largest chain graph. A recovery algorithm, which on basis of the (conditional) dependency model induced by an unknown chain graph finds the corresponding largest chain graph, is presented.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Semigraphoids Are Two-Antecedental Approximations of Stochastic Conditional Independence Models

The semigraphoid closure of every couple of CI-statements (GI=conditional independence) is a stochastic CI-model. As a consequence of this result it is shown that every probabilistically sound inference rule for CI-model, having at most two antecedents, is derivable from the semigraphoid inference rules. This justifies the use of semigraphoids as approximations of stochastic CI-models in probabilistic reasoning. The list of all 19 potential dominant elements of the mentioned semigraphoid closure is given as a byproduct.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access