BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Milad Ganjalizadeh

Milad Ganjalizadeh contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Networking and Internet Architectureeess.SP

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Interplay between Distributed AI Workflow and URLLC

Distributed artificial intelligence (AI) has recently accomplished tremendous breakthroughs in various communication services, ranging from fault-tolerant factory automation to smart cities. When distributed learning is run over a set of wireless connected devices, random channel fluctuations, and the incumbent services simultaneously running on the same network affect the performance of distributed learning. In this paper, we investigate the interplay between distributed AI workflow and ultra-reliable low latency communication (URLLC) services running concurrently over a network. Using 3GPP compliant simulations in a factory automation use case, we show the impact of various distributed AI settings (e.g., model size and the number of participating devices) on the convergence time of distributed AI and the application layer performance of URLLC. Unless we leverage the existing 5G-NR quality of service handling mechanisms to separate the traffic from the two services, our simulation results show that the impact of distributed AI on the availability of the URLLC devices is significant. Moreover, with proper setting of distributed AI (e.g., proper user selection), we can substantially reduce network resource utilization, leading to lower latency for distributed AI and higher availability for the URLLC users. Our results provide important insights for future 6G and AI standardization.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Translating Cyber-Physical Control Application Requirements to Network level Parameters

Cyber-physical control applications impose strict requirements on the reliability and latency of the underlying communication system. Hence, they have been mostly implemented using wired channels where the communication service is highly predictable. Nevertheless, fulfilling such stringent demands is envisioned with the fifth generation of mobile networks (5G). The requirements of such applications are often defined on the application layer. However, cyber-physical control applications can usually tolerate sparse packet loss, and therefore it is not at all obvious what configurations and settings these application level requirements impose on the underlying wireless network. In this paper, we apply the fundamental metrics from reliability literature to wireless communications and derive a mapping function between application level requirements and network level parameters for those metrics under deterministic arrivals. Our mapping function enables network designers to realize the end-to-end performance (as the target application observes it). It provides insights to the network controller to either enable more reliability enhancement features (e.g., repetition), if the metrics are below requirements, or to enable features increasing network utilization, otherwise. We evaluate our theoretical results by realistic and detailed simulations of a factory automation scenario. Our simulation results confirm the viability of the theoretical framework under various burst error tolerance and load conditions.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2019arXiv

Impact of Correlated Failures in 5G Dual Connectivity Architectures for URLLC Applications

Achieving end-to-end ultra-reliability and resiliency in mission critical communications is a major challenge for future wireless networks. Dual connectivity has been proposed by 3GPP as one of the viable solutions to fulfill the reliability requirements. However, the potential correlation in failures occurring over different wireless links is commonly neglected in current network design approaches. In this paper, we investigate the impact of realistic correlation among different wireless links on end-to-end reliability for two selected architectures from 3GPP. In ultra-reliable use-cases, we show that even small values of correlation can increase the end-to-end error rate by orders of magnitude. This may suggest alternative feasible architecture designs and paves the way towards serving ultra-reliable communications in 5G networks.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access