Source author record

Mikkel Abrahamsen

Mikkel Abrahamsen appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

8works
5topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

8 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

How to Cut Corners and Get Bounded Convex Curvature

We describe an algorithm for solving an important geometric problem arising in computer-aided manufacturing. When cutting away a region from a solid piece of material -- such as steel, wood, ceramics, or plastic -- using a rough tool in a milling machine, sharp convex corners of the region cannot be done properly, but have to be left for finer tools that are more expensive to use. We want to determine a toolpath that maximizes the use of the rough tool. In order to formulate the problem in mathematical terms, we introduce the notion of bounded convex curvature. A region of points in the plane $Q$ has \emph{bounded convex curvature} if for any point $x\in\partial Q$, there is a unit disk $U$ and $\varepsilon>0$ such that $x\in \partial U$ and all points in $U$ within distance $\varepsilon$ from $x$ are in $Q$. This translates to saying that as we traverse the boundary $\partial Q$ with the interior of $Q$ on the left side, then $\partial Q$ turns to the left with curvature at most $1$. There is no bound on the curvature where $\partial Q$ turns to the right. Given a region of points $P$ in the plane, we are now interested in computing the maximum subset $Q\subseteq P$ of bounded convex curvature. The difference in the requirement to left- and right-curvature is a natural consequence of different conditions when machining convex and concave areas of $Q$. We devise an algorithm to compute the unique maximum such set $Q$, when the boundary of $P$ consists of $n$ line segments and circular arcs of arbitrary radii. In the general case where $P$ may have holes, the algorithm runs in time $O(n^2)$ and uses $O(n)$ space. If $P$ is simply-connected, we describe a faster $O(n\log n)$ time algorithm.

preprint2021arXiv

Best Laid Plans of Lions and Men

We study the following question dating back to J.E. Littlewood (1885-1977): Can two lions catch a man in a bounded area with rectifiable lakes? The lions and the man are all assumed to be points moving with at most unit speed. That the lakes are rectifiable means that their boundaries are finitely long. This requirement is necessary to avoid pathological examples where the man survives forever because any path to the lions is infinitely long. We show that three lions have a winning strategy against a man in a bounded region with finitely many rectifiable lakes. This is "tight" in the sense that there exists a region $R$ in the plane where the man has a strategy to survive forever. We give a rigorous description of such a region $R$; a polygonal region with holes whose exterior and interior boundaries are pairwise disjoint, simple polygons. Finally, we consider the following game played on the entire plane instead of a compact region: There is any finite number of unit speed lions and one fast man who can run with speed $1+\varepsilon$ for some value $\varepsilon>0$. Can the man always survive? We answer the question in the affirmative for any $\varepsilon>0$. By letting the number of lions tend to infinity, we furthermore show that the man can survive against any countably infinite set of lions.

preprint2021arXiv

Minimum Perimeter-Sum Partitions in the Plane

Let $P$ be a set of $n$ points in the plane. We consider the problem of partitioning $P$ into two subsets $P_1$ and $P_2$ such that the sum of the perimeters of $\text{CH}(P_1)$ and $\text{CH}(P_2)$ is minimized, where $\text{CH}(P_i)$ denotes the convex hull of $P_i$. The problem was first studied by Mitchell and Wynters in 1991 who gave an $O(n^2)$ time algorithm. Despite considerable progress on related problems, no subquadratic time algorithm for this problem was found so far. We present an exact algorithm solving the problem in $O(n \log^2 n)$ time and a $(1+\varepsilon)$-approximation algorithm running in $O(n + 1/\varepsilon^2\cdot\log^2(1/\varepsilon))$ time.

preprint2021arXiv

Online Packing to Minimize Area or Perimeter

We consider online packing problems where we get a stream of axis-parallel rectangles. The rectangles have to be placed in the plane without overlapping, and each rectangle must be placed without knowing the subsequent rectangles. The goal is to minimize the perimeter or the area of the axis-parallel bounding box of the rectangles. We either allow rotations by 90 degrees or translations only. For the perimeter version we give algorithms with an absolute competitive ratio slightly less than 4 when only translations are allowed and when rotations are also allowed. We then turn our attention to minimizing the area and show that the asymptotic competitive ratio of any algorithm is at least $Ω(\sqrt{n})$, where $n$ is the number of rectangles in the stream, and this holds with and without rotations. We then present algorithms that match this bound in both cases. We also show that the competitive ratio cannot be bounded as a function of OPT. We then consider two special cases. The first is when all the given rectangles have aspect ratios bounded by some constant. The particular variant where all the rectangles are squares and we want to minimize the area of the bounding square has been studied before and an algorithm with a competitive ratio of 8 has been given [Fekete and Hoffmann, Algorithmica, 2017]. We improve the analysis of the algorithm and show that the ratio is at most 6, which is tight. The second special case is when all edges have length at least 1. Here, the $Ω(\sqrt n)$ lower bound still holds, and we turn our attention to lower bounds depending on OPT. We show that any algorithm has an asymptotic competitive ratio of at least $Ω(\sqrt{OPT})$ for the translational case and $Ω(\sqrt[4]{OPT})$ when rotations are allowed. For both versions, we give algorithms that match the respective lower bounds.

preprint2016arXiv

Near-Optimal Induced Universal Graphs for Bounded Degree Graphs

A graph $U$ is an induced universal graph for a family $F$ of graphs if every graph in $F$ is a vertex-induced subgraph of $U$. For the family of all undirected graphs on $n$ vertices Alstrup, Kaplan, Thorup, and Zwick [STOC 2015] give an induced universal graph with $O\!\left(2^{n/2}\right)$ vertices, matching a lower bound by Moon [Proc. Glasgow Math. Assoc. 1965]. Let $k= \lceil D/2 \rceil$. Improving asymptotically on previous results by Butler [Graphs and Combinatorics 2009] and Esperet, Arnaud and Ochem [IPL 2008], we give an induced universal graph with $O\!\left(\frac{k2^k}{k!}n^k \right)$ vertices for the family of graphs with $n$ vertices of maximum degree $D$. For constant $D$, Butler gives a lower bound of $Ω\!\left(n^{D/2}\right)$. For an odd constant $D\geq 3$, Esperet et al. and Alon and Capalbo [SODA 2008] give a graph with $O\!\left(n^{k-\frac{1}{D}}\right)$ vertices. Using their techniques for any (including constant) even values of $D$ gives asymptotically worse bounds than we present. For large $D$, i.e. when $D = Ω\left(\log^3 n\right)$, the previous best upper bound was ${n\choose\lceil D/2\rceil} n^{O(1)}$ due to Adjiashvili and Rotbart [ICALP 2014]. We give upper and lower bounds showing that the size is ${\lfloor n/2\rfloor\choose\lfloor D/2 \rfloor}2^{\pm\tilde{O}\left(\sqrt{D}\right)}$. Hence the optimal size is $2^{\tilde{O}(D)}$ and our construction is within a factor of $2^{\tilde{O}\left(\sqrt{D}\right)}$ from this. The previous results were larger by at least a factor of $2^{Ω(D)}$. As a part of the above, proving a conjecture by Esperet et al., we construct an induced universal graph with $2n-1$ vertices for the family of graphs with max degree $2$. In addition, we give results for acyclic graphs with max degree $2$ and cycle graphs. Our results imply the first labeling schemes that for any $D$ are at most $o(n)$ bits from optimal.

preprint2015arXiv

An Optimal Algorithm for the Separating Common Tangents of two Polygons

We describe an algorithm for computing the separating common tangents of two simple polygons using linear time and only constant workspace. A tangent of a polygon is a line touching the polygon such that all of the polygon lies to the same side of the line. A separating common tangent of two polygons is a tangent of both polygons where the polygons are lying on different sides of the tangent. Each polygon is given as a read-only array of its corners. If a separating common tangent does not exist, the algorithm reports that. Otherwise, two corners defining a separating common tangent are returned. The algorithm is simple and implies an optimal algorithm for deciding if the convex hulls of two polygons are disjoint or not. This was not known to be possible in linear time and constant workspace prior to this paper. An outer common tangent is a tangent of both polygons where the polygons are on the same side of the tangent. In the case where the convex hulls of the polygons are disjoint, we give an algorithm for computing the outer common tangents in linear time using constant workspace.

preprint2015arXiv

Spiral Toolpaths for High-Speed Machining of 2D Pockets with or without Islands

We describe new methods for the construction of spiral toolpaths for high-speed machining. In the simplest case, our method takes a polygon as input and a number $δ>0$ and returns a spiral starting at a central point in the polygon, going around towards the boundary while morphing to the shape of the polygon. The spiral consists of linear segments and circular arcs, it is $G^1$ continuous, it has no self-intersections, and the distance from each point on the spiral to each of the neighboring revolutions is at most $δ$. Our method has the advantage over previously described methods that it is easily adjustable to the case where there is an island in the polygon to be avoided by the spiral. In that case, the spiral starts at the island and morphs the island to the outer boundary of the polygon. It is shown how to apply that method to make significantly shorter spirals in polygons with no islands. Finally, we show how to make a spiral in a polygon with multiple islands by connecting the islands into one island.