Source author record

Miguel Piña

Miguel Piña appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

2works
1topics
1close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Modular Baskets Queue

A modular version of the baskets queue of Hoffman, Shalev and Shavit is presented. It manipulates the head and tail using a novel object called load-link/increment-conditional, which can be implemented using only READ/WRITE instructions, and admits implementations that spread contention. This suggests that there might be an alternative to the seemingly inherent bottleneck in previous queue implementations that manipulate the head and the tail using read-modify-write instructions over a single shared register.

preprint2021arXiv

Fully Read/Write Fence-Free Work-Stealing with Multiplicity

Work-stealing is a popular technique to implement dynamic load balancing in a distributed manner. In this approach, each process owns a set of tasks that have to be executed. The owner of the set can put tasks in it and can take tasks from it to execute them. When a process runs out of tasks, instead of being idle, it becomes a thief to steal tasks from a victim. Thus, a work-stealing algorithm provides three high-level operations: Put and Take, which can be invoked only by the owner, and Steal, which can be invoked by a thief. One of the main targets when designing work-stealing algorithms is to make Put and Take as simple and efficient as possible. Unfortunately, it has been shown that any work-stealing algorithm in the standard asynchronous model must use expensive Read- After-Write synchronization patterns or atomic Read-Modify-Write instructions, which may be costly in practice. Thus, prior research has proposed idempotent work-stealing, a relaxation for which there are algorithms with Put and Take devoid of Read-Modify-Write atomic instructions and Read-After-Write synchronization patterns; however, Put uses fences among Write instructions, and Steal uses Compare&Swap and fences among Read instructions. In the TSO model, in which Write (resp. Read) instructions cannot be reordered, there have been proposed fully fence-free work-stealing algorithms whose Put and Take have similar properties but Steal uses Compare&Swap or a lock.