Researcher profile

Michael Winikoff

Michael Winikoff contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Towards a Framework for Certification of Reliable Autonomous Systems

A computational system is called autonomous if it is able to make its own decisions, or take its own actions, without human supervision or control. The capability and spread of such systems have reached the point where they are beginning to touch much of everyday life. However, regulators grapple with how to deal with autonomous systems, for example how could we certify an Unmanned Aerial System for autonomous use in civilian airspace? We here analyse what is needed in order to provide verified reliable behaviour of an autonomous system, analyse what can be done as the state-of-the-art in automated verification, and propose a roadmap towards developing regulatory guidelines, including articulating challenges to researchers, to engineers, and to regulators. Case studies in seven distinct domains illustrate the article.

preprint2012arXiv

Challenges and Directions for Engineering Multi-agent Systems

In this talk I review where we stand regarding the engineering of multi-agent systems. There is both good news and bad news. The good news is that over the past decade we've made considerable progress on techniques for engineering multi-agent systems: we have good, usable methodologies, and mature tools. Furthermore, we've seen a wide range of demonstrated applications, and have even begun to quantify the advantages of agent technology. However, industry involvement in AAMAS appears to be declining (as measured by industry sponsorship of the conference), and industry affiliated attendants at AAMAS 2012 were few (1-2%). Furthermore, looking at the applications of agents being reported at recent AAMAS, usage of Agent Oriented Software Engineering (AOSE) and of Agent Oriented Programming Languages (AOPLs) is quite limited. This observation is corroborated by the results of a 2008 survey by Frank and Virginia Dignum. Based on these observations, I make five recommendations: (1) Re-engage with industry; (2) Stop designing AOPLs and AOSE methodologies ... and instead ... (3) Move to the "macro" level: develop techniques for designing and implementing interaction, integrate micro (single cognitive agent) and macro (MAS) design and implementation; (4) Develop techniques for the Assurance of MAS; and (5) Re-engage with the US.