Source author record

Michael Winikoff

Michael Winikoff appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

3works
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Towards a Framework for Certification of Reliable Autonomous Systems

A computational system is called autonomous if it is able to make its own decisions, or take its own actions, without human supervision or control. The capability and spread of such systems have reached the point where they are beginning to touch much of everyday life. However, regulators grapple with how to deal with autonomous systems, for example how could we certify an Unmanned Aerial System for autonomous use in civilian airspace? We here analyse what is needed in order to provide verified reliable behaviour of an autonomous system, analyse what can be done as the state-of-the-art in automated verification, and propose a roadmap towards developing regulatory guidelines, including articulating challenges to researchers, to engineers, and to regulators. Case studies in seven distinct domains illustrate the article.

preprint2014arXiv

Extending Agents by Transmitting Protocols in Open Systems

Agents in an open system communicate using interaction protocols. Suppose that we have a system of agents and that we want to add a new protocol that all (or some) agents should be able to understand. Clearly, modifying the source code for each agent implementation is not practical. A solution to this problem of upgrading an open system is to have a mechanism that allows agents to receive a description of an interaction protocol and use it. In this paper we propose a representation for protocols based on extending Petri nets. However, this is not enough: in an open system the source of a protocol may not be trusted and a protocol that is received may contain steps that are erroneous or that make confidential information public. We therefore also describe an analysis method that infers whether a protocol is safe. Finally, we give an execution model for extended Petri nets.

preprint2012arXiv

Challenges and Directions for Engineering Multi-agent Systems

In this talk I review where we stand regarding the engineering of multi-agent systems. There is both good news and bad news. The good news is that over the past decade we've made considerable progress on techniques for engineering multi-agent systems: we have good, usable methodologies, and mature tools. Furthermore, we've seen a wide range of demonstrated applications, and have even begun to quantify the advantages of agent technology. However, industry involvement in AAMAS appears to be declining (as measured by industry sponsorship of the conference), and industry affiliated attendants at AAMAS 2012 were few (1-2%). Furthermore, looking at the applications of agents being reported at recent AAMAS, usage of Agent Oriented Software Engineering (AOSE) and of Agent Oriented Programming Languages (AOPLs) is quite limited. This observation is corroborated by the results of a 2008 survey by Frank and Virginia Dignum. Based on these observations, I make five recommendations: (1) Re-engage with industry; (2) Stop designing AOPLs and AOSE methodologies ... and instead ... (3) Move to the "macro" level: develop techniques for designing and implementing interaction, integrate micro (single cognitive agent) and macro (MAS) design and implementation; (4) Develop techniques for the Assurance of MAS; and (5) Re-engage with the US.