Researcher profile

Michael Wallace

Michael Wallace contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2023arXiv

Monolithically integrated circuits for Optical injection locking of ring lasers with QKD and QPSK applications

Optical injection locking of integrated ring lasers promises to be a key technology of the future, but it is still lacking experimental verification. In this paper we present two monolithically integrated photonic circuits that experimentally realize Optically injection locking of ring lasers. The presented circuits pave the way for future application in Quantum Key Distribution and coherent communication

preprint2022arXiv

A Critical Appraisal of Data Augmentation Methods for Imaging-Based Medical Diagnosis Applications

Current data augmentation techniques and transformations are well suited for improving the size and quality of natural image datasets but are not yet optimized for medical imaging. We hypothesize that sub-optimal data augmentations can easily distort or occlude medical images, leading to false positives or negatives during patient diagnosis, prediction, or therapy/surgery evaluation. In our experimental results, we found that utilizing commonly used intensity-based data augmentation distorts the MRI scans and leads to texture information loss, thus negatively affecting the overall performance of classification. Additionally, we observed that commonly used data augmentation methods cannot be used with a plug-and-play approach in medical imaging, and requires manual tuning and adjustment.

preprint2022arXiv

Doubly-Robust Dynamic Treatment Regimen Estimation for Binary Outcomes

In precision medicine, Dynamic Treatment Regimes (DTRs) are treatment protocols that adapt over time in response to a patient's observed characteristics. A DTR is a set of decision functions that takes an individual patient's information as arguments and outputs an action to be taken. Building on observed data, the aim is to identify the DTR that optimizes expected patient outcomes. Multiple methods have been proposed for optimal DTR estimation with continuous outcomes. However, optimal DTR estimation with binary outcomes is more complicated and has received comparatively little attention. Solving a system of weighted generalized estimating equations, we propose a new balancing weight criterion to overcome the misspecification of generalized linear models' nuisance components. We construct binary pseudo-outcomes, and develop a doubly-robust and easy-to-use method to estimate an optimal DTR with binary outcomes. We also outline the underlying theory, which relies on the balancing property of the weights; provide simulation studies that verify the double-robustness of our method; and illustrate the method in studying the effects of e-cigarette usage on smoking cessation, using observational data from the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) study.

preprint2020arXiv

Measurement error and precision medicine: error-prone tailoring covariates in dynamic treatment regimes

Precision medicine incorporates patient-level covariates to tailor treatment decisions, seeking to improve outcomes. In longitudinal studies with time-varying covariates and sequential treatment decisions, precision medicine can be formalized with dynamic treatment regimes (DTRs): sequences of covariate-dependent treatment rules. To date, the precision medicine literature has not addressed a ubiquitous concern in health research - measurement error - where observed data deviate from the truth. We discuss the consequences of ignoring measurement error in the context of DTRs, focusing on challenges unique to precision medicine. We show - through simulation and theoretical results - that relatively simple measurement error correction techniques can lead to substantial improvements over uncorrected analyses, and apply these findings to the Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression (STAR*D) study.