BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Michael Pradel

Michael Pradel contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Software EngineeringProgramming LanguagesMachine LearningCryptography and Security

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
8works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

8 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

Change And Cover: Last-Mile, Pull Request-Based Regression Test Augmentation

Software is in constant evolution, with developers frequently submitting pull requests (PRs) to introduce new features or fix bugs. Testing PRs is critical to maintaining software quality. Yet, even in projects with extensive test suites, some PR-modified lines remain untested, leaving a "last-mile" regression test gap. Existing test generators typically aim to improve overall coverage, but do not specifically target the uncovered lines in PRs. We present Change And Cover (ChaCo), an LLM-based test augmentation technique that addresses this gap. It makes three contributions: (i) ChaCo considers the PR-specific patch coverage, offering developers augmented tests for code just when it is on the developers' mind. (ii) We identify providing suitable test context as a crucial challenge for an LLM to generate useful tests, and present two techniques to extract relevant test content, such as existing test functions, fixtures, and data generators. (iii) To make augmented tests acceptable for developers, ChaCo carefully integrates them into the existing test suite, e.g., by matching the test's structure and style with the existing tests, and generates a summary of the test addition for developer review. We evaluate ChaCo on 145 PRs from three popular and complex open-source projects - SciPy, Qiskit, and Pandas. The approach successfully helps 30% of PRs achieve full patch coverage, at the cost of $0.11, showing its effectiveness and practicality. Human reviewers find the tests to be worth adding (4.53/5.0), well integrated (4.2/5.0), and relevant to the PR (4.7/5.0). Ablations show test context is crucial for context-aware test generation, leading to 2x coverage. We submitted 12 tests, of which 8 have already been merged, and two previously unknown bugs were exposed and fixed. We envision our approach to be integrated into CI workflows, automating the last mile of regression test augmentation.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2026arXiv

Issue2Test: Generating Reproducing Test Cases from Issue Reports

Automated tools for solving GitHub issues are receiving significant attention by both researchers and practitioners, e.g., in the form of foundation models and LLM-based agents prompted with issues. A crucial step toward successfully solving an issue is creating a test case that accurately reproduces the issue. Such a test case can guide the search for an appropriate patch and help validate whether the patch matches the issue's intent. However, existing techniques for issue reproduction show only moderate success. This paper presents Issue2Test, an LLM-based technique for automatically generating a reproducing test case for a given issue report. Unlike automated regression test generators, which aim at creating passing tests, our approach aims at a test that fails, and that fails specifically for the reason described in the issue. To this end, Issue2Test performs three steps: (1) understand the issue and gather context (e.g., related files and project-specific guidelines) relevant for reproducing it; (2) generate a candidate test case; and (3) iteratively refine the test case based on compilation and runtime feedback until it fails and the failure aligns with the problem described in the issue. We evaluate Issue2Test on the SWT-bench-lite dataset, where it successfully reproduces 32.9% of the issues, achieving a 16.3% relative improvement over the best existing technique. Our evaluation also shows that Issue2Test reproduces 20 issues that four prior techniques fail to address, contributing a total of 60.4% of all issues reproduced by these tools. We envision our approach to contribute to enhancing the overall progress in the important task of automatically solving GitHub issues.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Meta Learning for Code Summarization

Source code summarization is the task of generating a high-level natural language description for a segment of programming language code. Current neural models for the task differ in their architecture and the aspects of code they consider. In this paper, we show that three SOTA models for code summarization work well on largely disjoint subsets of a large code-base. This complementarity motivates model combination: We propose three meta-models that select the best candidate summary for a given code segment. The two neural models improve significantly over the performance of the best individual model, obtaining an improvement of 2.1 BLEU points on a dataset of code segments where at least one of the individual models obtains a non-zero BLEU.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

IdBench: Evaluating Semantic Representations of Identifier Names in Source Code

Identifier names convey useful information about the intended semantics of code. Name-based program analyses use this information, e.g., to detect bugs, to predict types, and to improve the readability of code. At the core of name-based analyses are semantic representations of identifiers, e.g., in the form of learned embeddings. The high-level goal of such a representation is to encode whether two identifiers, e.g., len and size, are semantically similar. Unfortunately, it is currently unclear to what extent semantic representations match the semantic relatedness and similarity perceived by developers. This paper presents IdBench, the first benchmark for evaluating semantic representations against a ground truth created from thousands of ratings by 500 software developers. We use IdBench to study state-of-the-art embedding techniques proposed for natural language, an embedding technique specifically designed for source code, and lexical string distance functions. Our results show that the effectiveness of semantic representations varies significantly and that the best available embeddings successfully represent semantic relatedness. On the downside, no existing technique provides a satisfactory representation of semantic similarities, among other reasons because identifiers with opposing meanings are incorrectly considered to be similar, which may lead to fatal mistakes, e.g., in a refactoring tool. Studying the strengths and weaknesses of the different techniques shows that they complement each other. As a first step toward exploiting this complementarity, we present an ensemble model that combines existing techniques and that clearly outperforms the best available semantic representation.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Learning to Make Compiler Optimizations More Effective

Because loops execute their body many times, compiler developers place much emphasis on their optimization. Nevertheless, in view of highly diverse source code and hardware, compilers still struggle to produce optimal target code. The sheer number of possible loop optimizations, including their combinations, exacerbates the problem further. Today's compilers use hard-coded heuristics to decide when, whether, and which of a limited set of optimizations to apply. Often, this leads to highly unstable behavior, making the success of compiler optimizations dependent on the precise way a loop has been written. This paper presents LoopLearner, which addresses the problem of compiler instability by predicting which way of writing a loop will lead to efficient compiled code. To this end, we train a neural network to find semantically invariant source-level transformations for loops that help the compiler generate more efficient code. Our model learns to extract useful features from the raw source code and predicts the speedup that a given transformation is likely to yield. We evaluate LoopLearner with 1,895 loops from various performance-relevant benchmarks. Applying the transformations that our model deems most favorable prior to compilation yields an average speedup of 1.14x. When trying the top-3 suggested transformations, the average speedup even increases to 1.29x. Comparing the approach with an exhaustive search through all available code transformations shows that LoopLearner helps to identify the most beneficial transformations in several orders of magnitude less time.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Mir: Automated Quantifiable Privilege Reduction Against Dynamic Library Compromise in JavaScript

Third-party libraries ease the development of large-scale software systems. However, they often execute with significantly more privilege than needed to complete their task. This additional privilege is often exploited at runtime via dynamic compromise, even when these libraries are not actively malicious. Mir addresses this problem by introducing a fine-grained read-write-execute (RWX) permission model at the boundaries of libraries. Every field of an imported library is governed by a set of permissions, which developers can express when importing libraries. To enforce these permissions during program execution, Mir transforms libraries and their context to add runtime checks. As permissions can overwhelm developers, Mir's permission inference generates default permissions by analyzing how libraries are used by their consumers. Applied to 50 popular libraries, Mir's prototype for JavaScript demonstrates that the RWX permission model combines simplicity with power: it is simple enough to automatically infer 99.33% of required permissions, it is expressive enough to defend against 16 real threats, it is efficient enough to be usable in practice (1.93% overhead), and it enables a novel quantification of privilege reduction.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Type Safety with JSON Subschema

JSON is a popular data format used pervasively in web APIs, cloud computing, NoSQL databases, and increasingly also machine learning. JSON Schema is a language for declaring the structure of valid JSON data. There are validators that can decide whether a JSON document is valid with respect to a schema. Unfortunately, like all instance-based testing, these validators can only show the presence and never the absence of a bug. This paper presents a complementary technique: JSON subschema checking, which can be used for static type checking with JSON Schema. Deciding whether one schema is a subschema of another is non-trivial because of the richness of the JSON Schema specification language. Given a pair of schemas, our approach first canonicalizes and simplifies both schemas, then decides the subschema question on the canonical forms, dispatching simpler subschema queries to type-specific checkers. We apply an implementation of our subschema checking algorithm to 8,548 pairs of real-world JSON schemas from different domains, demonstrating that it can decide the subschema question for most schema pairs and is always correct for schema pairs that it can decide. We hope that our work will bring more static guarantees to hard-to-debug domains, such as cloud computing and artificial intelligence.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

TypeWriter: Neural Type Prediction with Search-based Validation

Maintaining large code bases written in dynamically typed languages, such as JavaScript or Python, can be challenging due to the absence of type annotations: simple data compatibility errors proliferate, IDE support is limited, and APIs are hard to comprehend. Recent work attempts to address those issues through either static type inference or probabilistic type prediction. Unfortunately, static type inference for dynamic languages is inherently limited, while probabilistic approaches suffer from imprecision. This paper presents TypeWriter, the first combination of probabilistic type prediction with search-based refinement of predicted types. TypeWriter's predictor learns to infer the return and argument types for functions from partially annotated code bases by combining the natural language properties of code with programming language-level information. To validate predicted types, TypeWriter invokes a gradual type checker with different combinations of the predicted types, while navigating the space of possible type combinations in a feedback-directed manner. We implement the TypeWriter approach for Python and evaluate it on two code corpora: a multi-million line code base at Facebook and a collection of 1,137 popular open-source projects. We show that TypeWriter's type predictor achieves an F1 score of 0.64 (0.79) in the top-1 (top-5) predictions for return types, and 0.57 (0.80) for argument types, which clearly outperforms prior type prediction models. By combining predictions with search-based validation, TypeWriter can fully annotate between 14% to 44% of the files in a randomly selected corpus, while ensuring type correctness. A comparison with a static type inference tool shows that TypeWriter adds many more non-trivial types. TypeWriter currently suggests types to developers at Facebook and several thousands of types have already been accepted with minimal changes.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access