Source author record

Michael Orshansky

Michael Orshansky appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

2works
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Lattice PUF: A Strong Physical Unclonable Function Provably Secure against Machine Learning Attacks

We propose a strong physical unclonable function (PUF) provably secure against machine learning (ML) attacks with both classical and quantum computers. Its security is derived from cryptographic hardness of learning decryption functions of public-key cryptosystems. Our design compactly realizes the decryption function of the learning-with-errors (LWE) cryptosystem. Due to the fundamental connection of LWE to lattice problems, we call the construction the lattice PUF. Lattice PUF is constructed using a physically obfuscated key (POK), an LWE decryption function block, and a linear-feedback shift register (LFSR) as a pseudo-random number generator. The POK provides the secret key of the LWE decryption function; its stability is ensured by a fuzzy extractor (FE). To reduce the challenge size, we exploit distributional relaxations of space-efficient LWEs. That allows only a small challenge-seed to be transmitted with the full-length challenge generated by the LFSR, resulting in a 100X reduction of communication cost. To prevent an active challenge-manipulation attack, a self-incrementing counter is embedded into the challenge seed. We prototyped the lattice PUF with 2^136 challenge-response pairs (CRPs) on a Spartan 6 FPGA, which required 45 slices for the PUF logic proper and 233 slices for the FE. Simulation-based evaluation shows the mean (std) of uniformity to be 49.98% (1.58%), of uniqueness to be 50.00% (1.58%), and of reliability to be 1.26% (2.88%). The LWE concrete hardness estimator guarantees that a successful ML attack of the lattice PUF will require the infeasible 2^128 CPU operations. Several classes of empirical ML attacks, including support vector machine, logistic regression, and deep neural networks, are used: in all attacks, the prediction error remains above 49.76% after 1 million training CRPs.

preprint2020arXiv

Training with Multi-Layer Embeddings for Model Reduction

Modern recommendation systems rely on real-valued embeddings of categorical features. Increasing the dimension of embedding vectors improves model accuracy but comes at a high cost to model size. We introduce a multi-layer embedding training (MLET) architecture that trains embeddings via a sequence of linear layers to derive superior embedding accuracy vs. model size trade-off. Our approach is fundamentally based on the ability of factorized linear layers to produce superior embeddings to that of a single linear layer. We focus on the analysis and implementation of a two-layer scheme. Harnessing the recent results in dynamics of backpropagation in linear neural networks, we explain the ability to get superior multi-layer embeddings via their tendency to have lower effective rank. We show that substantial advantages are obtained in the regime where the width of the hidden layer is much larger than that of the final embedding (d). Crucially, at conclusion of training, we convert the two-layer solution into a single-layer one: as a result, the inference-time model size scales as d. We prototype the MLET scheme within Facebook's PyTorch-based open-source Deep Learning Recommendation Model. We show that it allows reducing d by 4-8X, with a corresponding improvement in memory footprint, at given model accuracy. The experiments are run on two publicly available click-through-rate prediction benchmarks (Criteo-Kaggle and Avazu). The runtime cost of MLET is 25%, on average.