Researcher profile

Michael Manhart

Michael Manhart contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Appearance Learning for Image-based Motion Estimation in Tomography

In tomographic imaging, anatomical structures are reconstructed by applying a pseudo-inverse forward model to acquired signals. Geometric information within this process is usually depending on the system setting only, i. e., the scanner position or readout direction. Patient motion therefore corrupts the geometry alignment in the reconstruction process resulting in motion artifacts. We propose an appearance learning approach recognizing the structures of rigid motion independently from the scanned object. To this end, we train a siamese triplet network to predict the reprojection error (RPE) for the complete acquisition as well as an approximate distribution of the RPE along the single views from the reconstructed volume in a multi-task learning approach. The RPE measures the motioninduced geometric deviations independent of the object based on virtual marker positions, which are available during training. We train our network using 27 patients and deploy a 21-4-2 split for training, validation and testing. In average, we achieve a residual mean RPE of 0.013mm with an inter-patient standard deviation of 0.022 mm. This is twice the accuracy compared to previously published results. In a motion estimation benchmark the proposed approach achieves superior results in comparison with two state-of-the-art measures in nine out of twelve experiments. The clinical applicability of the proposed method is demonstrated on a motion-affected clinical dataset.

preprint2020arXiv

Data Consistent CT Reconstruction from Insufficient Data with Learned Prior Images

Image reconstruction from insufficient data is common in computed tomography (CT), e.g., image reconstruction from truncated data, limited-angle data and sparse-view data. Deep learning has achieved impressive results in this field. However, the robustness of deep learning methods is still a concern for clinical applications due to the following two challenges: a) With limited access to sufficient training data, a learned deep learning model may not generalize well to unseen data; b) Deep learning models are sensitive to noise. Therefore, the quality of images processed by neural networks only may be inadequate. In this work, we investigate the robustness of deep learning in CT image reconstruction by showing false negative and false positive lesion cases. Since learning-based images with incorrect structures are likely not consistent with measured projection data, we propose a data consistent reconstruction (DCR) method to improve their image quality, which combines the advantages of compressed sensing and deep learning: First, a prior image is generated by deep learning. Afterwards, unmeasured projection data are inpainted by forward projection of the prior image. Finally, iterative reconstruction with reweighted total variation regularization is applied, integrating data consistency for measured data and learned prior information for missing data. The efficacy of the proposed method is demonstrated in cone-beam CT with truncated data, limited-angle data and sparse-view data, respectively. For example, for truncated data, DCR achieves a mean root-mean-square error of 24 HU and a mean structure similarity index of 0.999 inside the field-of-view for different patients in the noisy case, while the state-of-the-art U-Net method achieves 55 HU and 0.995 respectively for these two metrics.